Member Info for chippyjo

Thought you’d reply even though you said you wouldn’t. I sold after the drop, not a trader trait.
Do svidaniya

Alt, your post is blatantly untrue and shows you to be single minded, arrogant and suffering from a selective memory.
Changing names whenever you throw your toys from the rather than taking a breath and accepting this is a public BB where control is in the hands of the moderators shows a lack of a grasp on reality.
I’m not a trader and my posting history will show that my purchase and selling of the company was due to large volume traders manipulating the price exacerbated by the poor comms from the company and dislike of the self congratulatory manner shares were allocated to the BOD. I have never criticised the tech the ethos or the aims of the company. But as a public listed company, there is an expectation of progress and to keep those invested abreast of that progress. Be it positive or negative.
Alt filtered, the first ever.

Was that aimed at me Alt?

Thanks Segedunum but I think you may be in the minority regarding me.
Many seems to think I’m gamekeeper turned fox.
Not true but everyone is entitled to an opinion unless it’s regarding religion, race, gender etc which now can be considered and recorded as a hate crime even without investigation or conviction!
The brave new world eh…

Alt, my point was why did AFC make Rolec news? I don’t think they are the right target partner. More a charge point supplier than energy producer. And I’ve said many times ABB is the right partner. Not sure they are interested in the liquid system though.
Also Haggis talks about construction sites having space. As an engineer I worked on many sites and space is almost always at a premium so energy density is important.
There will also be a period of “adjustment” if new fuels are to be used as well.
HS2 may have more space.

I have to say Bondi, Rolec would have been well out of their depth with an AFC fuel cell charger. The main questions are why AFC made noise about it in the first place and did they cheese them off by nicking a staff member?
Financials on the ExE unit were suppressed by Bond and I’m sure the reason was it was a unit supplied at cost. So not really a sale but a showcase demonstrator and data collection exercise in my view. No problems with that but the financials this year need to reflect they’ve had it cheap on year one while racking in the advertising revenue from the series.

As I said alt, it was in response to you disclosing mine. Nothing to do with a group thing….

Oh and not fascinated in any way, just like people to be upfront and honest about who they are. Haggis come clean yet? No I thought not

I named you once in an unrelated thread to the one your talking about as you used my name prior.
As for the abuse aimed at you, that has no place here or anywhere else and I expect LSE to act accordingly with and law enforcement as required. And yes I spotted you straight away also.
Your posts are moving away from fact/company comment and into personnel slurs also and that can lead into confrontation which can and does get out of hand.
But you never seem to comment on the disgusting posts haggis makes either. Company you keep and all that…..

Alt bumble, your memory is skewed, it was surprise as we had never met before and she knew who I was.
As for the rest, well that doesn’t even warrant a reply. Your spent too long with your head in the grass.

There are two issues at play, markets are down which is not unusual in January and Bonds performance perceived or otherwise.
There is a fundamental lack on the hardcore holders side to accept publicly that there is anything wrong with Bond and his performance as much as the contempt others holders past and present have for him and his results thus far.
Getting personal isn’t good and Haggis has been the most abusive generally but even bumblebee, bumblebee2, muscorum stooped to that level with his STD comment about me and Garonne.
He’s even back in a new guise nowadays, got to wonder why certain posters do this?
A comment was made about me turning on investors after representing them, I created a vehicle for shareholders to represent themselves only. And a certain poster/holder didn’t really want to get involved unless he could veto the consensus if he didn’t like it.
Actually the chairman has the job of holding the board to account so maybe he should be the target of any shareholder angst now.

https://pinnaclehipdocuments.com/PIN%20Seeding%20Study/PLT-00026.PDF
Let’s see if he ever makes it to the C in AidInc model…

Block, plenty have made money here, but not by sitting still and banging the drum.
AImM sure didn’t pony up the cash and has traded. But that’s the stock market.

Nick, really, some people can’t accept a material loss but semi stomach a paper loss.
When selling it means you have to account for the £ notes in reality.
I was in for 18p when it went down to below 4p. Bit the bullet and dug into my wallet which eventually paid off. It wasn’t confidence in Bond it was a punt on the market swings in the sector…

Cheeks, it’s not a price thing, it’s a performance and trust thing.
Others may rightly or wrongly feel things are going swimmingly and that’s fine. I will take risks for so long then bang out. If there was a trend I felt was going where I want then that’s also a reason to put my cash on the line. If fact, one of the places I put my investment more recently is a much more risky bet, but that’s a choice of the individual. Bonds previous employment never filled me with confidence and seeing at the meeting in 2019 even less so.
You take as you find and others seem to think UV emanates from his posterior.

The only person keeping the share price lower is Adam Bond.
Meet the market and shareholder expectations and this will fly. But there’s the issue….

Alt, oddly enough nobody asked.
Still, who in their right mind would have put so much work in without having a pecuniary interest?
Eh BB

Your prerogative Alt but it doesn’t matter to me either way.
What some posters here can’t fathom is why holders “knock” their investments.
Let me spell it out to you.
I have a child who I love and think the world of, but if they misbehave. Do I let that love stop me from being critical or in more serious issues intervening when I don’t agree with that behaviour?
Well maybe this is the issue in wider society that some can’t either see wrong doing or have the gumption to put their morals first even though it may be painful or difficult.
I didn’t see the way Bond is running the company as conducive to the benefit of shareholders. Even worse I’m concerned that ethic as one where shareholders may not benefit should a deal need to be done and management decide another option is better. Happens all the time in Aim.
Been there, got the T shirt, jumper, trousers and jacket….

Yes alt, but like the others I’ve seen there’s a data protection issue so you’ll just have to trust me….
It was as he said as well.

Well what is there to talk about AimM?
Sales……
R and D maybe but Bond doesn’t let any info out that’s useful to the market unless, well you know what….