Holes not reported....10 Mar 2020 23:31
Really looking forward to seeing hole 43 results and rest of result of hole 42,although from memory the last twice that the deeper depths of holes were pending they were not spectacular (good but not spectacular)
Also had 39 and had 41 look interesting. Especially had 39 as this looks to be going above had 49 on the fig 7, which had a great intercept.
One point, what would be the reason for abandoning holes in the cover sequence? As had37 looked like it may be in the right area for the hgz,as at the minute nothings hit between had 49 and had 23.
Fantastic results though and maybe my post from earlier on won’t be far off the mark ;)
GL everyone