We would love to hear your thoughts about our site and services, please take our survey here.
Well said!
Keith, I too can confirm everything D220 has said is true as I have also seen the full email. On that tweet the info is hidden because it contains market sensitive information. I too will not be sharing the full email but I can confirm everything is true.
It will still need to be done. There's no way the sale, share holders vote and everything else will be completed in just 3 weeks.
I mean I wish it would but it's just not technically possible. Shareholders votes will take a good number of weeks in itself, not to mention a complete sale with all the legal stuff involved.
We can dream... But unfortunately a dream that won't happen by the end of the month.
HahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahhaahhaahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahaahahahahahaHahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahhaahhaahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahaahahahahahaHahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahhaahhaahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahaahahahahahaHahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahhaahhaahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahaahahahahahaHahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahhaahhaahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahaahahahahahaHahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahhaahhaahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahaahahahahahaHahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahhaahhaahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahaahahahahahaHahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahhaahhaahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahaahahahahaha
Yeah ok!
PS, the clue is in the name "potential" buyer. It's a 100% cert. Until they make an offer and it becomes legally binding then obviously EUA can't talk to other buyers that come along after that as they're legally bound to sell the company/asset to them.
At the moment EUA are still free to have discussions with other interested parties. Otherwise that's like saying to EUA I want to buy your company, they're now locked out from talking to other businesses. I drag the process out so long the SP drops to a place I'm happy with whilst also restricting them from talking to anyone else. I could do that for years.
Hi Mac,
I appreciate your posts but I don't think we're exclusively locked in with the potential buyer. Am I missing something i.e. it says on an RNS we're exclusively locked in?
Just because we have a buyer on the table and are talking to them doesn't mean another company can't show up and discuss our assets and make a higher bid for the company/assets.
You/I/Everyone doesn't know we're "exclusively" locked in. I mean we don't even know if the potential buyer has even named their price. There's so little we know at the moment that you can't say EUA is "exclusively locked in". I mean who's to say EUA have put a clause in to say they won't be restricted on discussions with any other potential buyer.
Gla
But do you not think the more we play their games there more they're going to do it?
Not being funny but genius holders know exactly where this share is going. Those that don't and fall victim to selling their shares because they got scared then we've/they've got to ask themselves some questions:
1) Why invest in a company you know nothing about.
2) Why listen to someone without doing your own research.
3) Do you always make life decisions based on what someone has told you to do?
Those people may as well reply to one of those "my uncle has died and has left you £100,000,000, I'm an African solicitor and would like to arrange transfer" emails.
To me it doesn't matter, the share price will fly like a SpaceX rocket when a few things are confirmed. So any dip is a "meh".
Good luck all geniue holders, and those are are invested but don't really have a clue what's going on just read some of Tilly's threads :-)
I disagree, if people don't reply to stupid threads then there thread is only going to keep going further down the board with the geninue threads staying at the top.
Otherwise the more people reply the more it's going to stay at the top of the board for more people to see and the geninue threads got pushed down the board.
You've got to think about what "those" users agenda is which is normally (among more):
1) Cause an argument because they're kids.
2) Try and scare people into selling to sell their shares.
3) Get as many people replying as possible.
4) Keep the thread at the top of the board so more people see it.
5) Reply back to users with certain sentences to guarantee a response more or less guaranteeing step 4.
And more.... Instead of users playing their silly games and doing EXACTLY what they want to happen, just ignore it. Let their posts fall to the bottom of the forum and let the geninue posts stay at the top.
Simples...
I honestly don't understand.... Some of the most active people here are constantly replying to posters they assume are here to cause trouble.
I just don't understand.... WHY?!?!?
If you think someone here is trying to be an ass then WHY give them the time of day by constantly replying to them?? If anything your just giving them more of a reason to reply by saying something they know will trigger another response. Then before you know it it's a never ending thread.
Everyone moans about these "bad members". So why.... Just why are you even responding to them?!? Don't you think that's EXACTLY what they want you to do?!?
How old are we, 5?
It's SIMPLE! Read it, if you don't like it then don't give them the time of day by replying and filter them. END OF!
All down to the BOD if they want the shares suspended or not I believe. It's not something they have to do, example of that I guess is Morrisons when they was getting bids from different buyers and when the final bid price was accepted the shares wasn't suspended.
Or is that a different scenario? Could be talking utter runish :-)