apologies hadn't seen prev posts :)
what was the news?
Hmmm interesting...I guess we will just have to stick it out and see, I'm hugely down too so just going to have to see what happens haha all the best
so if they didn't get it above $1 for ten days it delists from nasdaq, then where does it go?
Here we go with your 3-6 posts '1 month old dodge account' you won't last long here, believe me.... Spreading FUD - fear uncertainty and doubt - over the bulk underground, becuase that's essentially the only unknown left that such disingenuous posts can target.
Last year we had months and months of tecnhical FUD with the GreenTool and others - who said Havieron would never be economic... but here we are 12 months later with a gigantic starter deposit, a $50m decline going in, and $50m GGP cash funding to DFS, and a published phase 1 mine PFS to take to the bank ... so NCM can get ore to Telfer ASAP.
You may be able to confuse and scare the un-researched with your manipulation, but you cannot touch Bamps or me.
For the rest of you MrBig is a skilled and devious operator who last night was attempting to exploit an ostensibly clever argument. The posts were subsequently removed this am. For the correct reasons.
What he/she was trying to do last night was apply NCM's conservative, underground stoping phase 1 mine operational costs @ $84/tonne - actually $81/tonne according to GGP using the correct exchange rate to Bulk Underground production.
The first Stoping operation has naturally has lower volumes, due to the inherent volume limitations of the Stoping technique and higher costs - ore transport to surface limitation, requirement for drill and blast / explosives, and extra material handling, and subsequence labour in back pasting costs )
But you cannot apply this to the anticipated Bulk under ground block caving grades of the larger scale deposit where the cost per tonne would be circa $25-27/tonne
This is a totally and fundamentally inappropriate comparison made by BiggL - It's like comparing two completely different company cost structures, AND specifically designed to imply that anything under 1.5g is likely to be 'uneconomic'...
And It's total BS becuase we ALL know that Cadia is economic down to 0.4g/t Au... specifically due the bulk efficiencies of the operational costs.
And very much like comparing and interweaving the cost structure of building Ferraris directly to Ford Fiestas -
IE both make massive profits, BUT in TOTALLY different ways . Obviously You cannot make a profit building Ford fiestas in the way you build a Ferrari though. That would be loss making.
That's the best analogy I can come up with. And that is the tactic of this poster. Always Happy to smash them into touch.
Expect Multiple shorter accounts with a very obvious agenda.s
Regarding bulk underground : The only question is will this be a block cave or a more selective sub level cave...? Anyone with mining nouse can see that.. The grade in those breccia are nothing short of sensational. And a mine in their own right.
Ohhh sorry I misunderstood you, you hold them elsewhere and wanted to move them to HL my bad
Oh - i’m with HL for tils, I have the dummy line for accustem and they got moved to a stocks and shares dealing account, so they won’t hold them though???
hey - just out of interest what provider are you using?
i’m sorry if this is stating the obvious but just want to clarify - i’m not very scientifically minded haha, so foralumab is essentially effective against any mutation?
oh, i'm so sorry to appear really stupid, I just saw mab and assumed it was relevant and a positive thing if theirs weren't succeeding - but thank you for that informaiton its very helpful :)
the report isnt talking about vaccines though, it’s talking about antibodies .. although it’s an old article i thought it was worth knowing that gsk eli lilly and regeneron treatments all have not been entirely successful