RE: The next rns15 Jan 2021 13:44
Sorry Monte but i don't think it is.
I made no reference to how long people have been invested. That's a different thing entirely. I've been here nearly 8 years myself. I'm not some Jonny Come Lately with a loudmouth who doesn't know the journey we have all been through since the early holes of Cascabel. There will be others who go back even further.
The point I'm making, that i think those agreeing with Redknight would struggle to refute, is that if a set of circumstances conspired where the SOLG share price ran up, say 100% from where it is now, would they remain invested with the same exposure that they have now? I believe the answer to be no given that they're stressing about the share price now and the priorities of the management team.
The board would then go much quieter as these traders play up their funds elsewhere and wait for SOLG to become an opportunity again.
That's the point. That's why there's fretting about the CEO micro-managing the share price of the company.
Nick may have called you nuts if you asked him 7 years ago where we would be in 2021 but quite simply life changes. The opportunity in Ecuador changed and as such the trajectory of the company changed. Were SolGold all about Alpala I'm sure we'd have sold Cascabel by 2018 and not be sat here now. But we didn't, in fact, the objective became Ecuador and Cascabel is just one part of that.
I'm not asking for anything now. People are entitled to do what they like. I am being patient because i think that is the right thing to do now. You and everyone else can do what you/they please. All I'm saying is that people should recognise the variables in play and the wider strategy before making unrealistic demands or chucking unfair criticisms.
You can exit today if you want. You can exit any day that you choose. Maybe the issue here is that assuming an exit correlates with a share price high/spike.
As i said, the story changes. It isn't fair to expect a story told years ago to still apply. Not fair at all.