Member Info for Bozi

Addicknt -nobody spoke at the AGM other than the chair Liam Twigger.

How would good manners have helped his cause. Would it change your opinion twards him? Be honest now...

The fact people are upset over it is very self-entitled and precious behaviour. We're all numbers on a share register when the day is done.

So what you're saying Addicknt is that his facts were right but his opinion was wrong...

You claim to understand the boardroom but you have never elaborated on the dynamics in question. Nick received 55% of the vote, enough to carry the motion. He is only in this position because the three major shareholders are working in concert to try and prise the flagship asset away from the company who has done all the work established all of the social and environmental capital and incurred all the expense.

Mather can walk with his head held high. He brought NCM and BHP on board and they stabbed him in the back for their own gain. This isn't the cut and thrust of business but the slapped-arse behaviour of executives who are used to getting their own way, before now.

A company reserves the right to change it's strategy ToS1963.

It is the company's strategy. Not the investor's, the government's or anyone elses.

So you chose not to subscribe to the change in strategy Grimbergen. Your decision at the time and your problem now.

Read the Alpala PFS update RNS from late November. That explains where everything is up to and when it can be expected.

Regarding Blanca and La Hueca drill results, there's one rather obvious assumption to be drawn from the fact they haven't had their own press release. Im pretty sure there's reference to them in the last MD&A.

I'd only let someone near Alpala if they were willing to pay what it is worth or what a share of it is worth. Porvenir is off the menu for me because it's under a different subsidiary and we don't need any involvement there.

Absolutely Smickster, but theres plenty who wanted almost a personalised thank you for their pittance of a vote whilst blissfully ignoring the fact that the guy's stewardship today had created immense wealth for them and then maintained it when it would have been justnas easy to surrender a chunk to the cash rich majors.

Then there's those who take offence because the joint venture partner is given an update first and can't respect the sensitive nature of the content to create an environment where the update is synced to both sets of investors.

And at 17:18 rcgl2.

Bravo Sir.

Rcgl2 - that was one rather large nail you hit on the head at 16:43.

TBTT

What about the opportunity cost in terms of creating a major in Ecuador with a pipeline of significant discoveries that become viable projects, all from organic growth and value added from exploration?

Nothing worse in this sense than people who invest in a company with a stated stragey and do nothing but complain because their strategy doesn't match the company's.

Invest in a company with a business model that suits your strategy. There's resource companies out there thst have no intention to develop their assets. Why not buy them?

Nah I wouldn't say I hope it's IRR. I have no issue with the IRR management and have no desire to see them replaced.

I do agree with you that Heddle will take a huge investor following with him wherever he does go.

I'm just not sure it's going to be SOLG. Surely if GGP became too big for him then?moving to SOLG makes no sense?

It would probably suit Newcrest though.

How many explorer of the year awards has Gervaise Heddle won the out of interest?

Expect to see his next role announced soon.

Not bad MFU.

I do expect Heddle to join the DGR stable but I don't think it will be SOLG.

A question for you Schlem...

What difference to the stock value do you think there will be from giving away stakes in some or all of SolGold's regional prospects?

The whole allure of the regional portfolio was that all licences were 100% owned by one of the 4 subsidiaries.

Personally I think giving away stakes in the priority regionals would be a poor outcome.

Please yourself.

I never said they did anything wrong Earthling. NCM are free to do what they like.

But if ToS1963 isn't going to sell up for anything less than fair value then he/she needs to alter their time horizon and expectations to match the company's newly chosen strategy.

Monte

A PFS is a significant study that relies on independent input. The speed of that input was impacted by the first Covid lockdown which the company had to take measures for to protect its staff. As such, it wasn't possible to carry out the drilling and data collection for 3 months.

SolGold communicated the delay along with a summary of the remaining items of the PFS being worked on. It was fairly detailed.

The fact that Cornerstone ran to the market first via a corporate presentation wasn't the company's fault. It was Cornerstone causing trouble.

There has obviously since been the formation of the Alpala Committee and the discovery of some good looking mineralisation at TA has required a rethink of the original PFS concepts and assumptions. Most unfortunate but what can you do. If the resource continues where it wasn't anticipated you have to alter plans, hence the additional slippage, again communicated by the company.

No I've listened Earthling, and I wish you well. I hope you have another +4500% year and provide a comfortable life for those nearest and dearest.

ToS1963 - with all due respect, Newcrest had a man on the board until the Franco deal. When that happened getting in a huff was exactly what they did.

They might not have sold their shares but they did make a press comment that they were employing a bank to consider all options with regards their shareholding.

It just so happens that the option they chose was to remove Craig Jones, keep their shares and buddy up with CGP and BHP to go hostile against the management of the company.

NCM can take this stance because whilst all this was going on they signed their earn in for Havieron and early results were securing the supply for Telfer with each passing month. They also raised a chunk of money through bonds for Fuerta Del Norte's streams, so their reliance on SolGold as a strategic investment, in my view, wasn't as strong as it was when they initially came to the table in 2016.

What have you said Earthling?

You have said there might be a JV or full SolGold sale... which I've taken on board.

Everything else you've said is nothing more than goading people you've argued with, winding up people you disagree with and generally beating your chest while shouting about how right you are and how nobody listens to you.

I'll be honest, that's not a huge amount of value to take, but I've listened nonetheless.

Far far more insulting than anything I've said Earthling.

You don't know me.

Show me the respect you give Quady's views.

I don't create new accounts and spam the board, so there's something to be said there about immaturity.

Last word from me earthling.

This news is no shock. Warren Irwin has been telling us all for months that this was happening, so it's no shock at all...

It's just unwanted. I am loyal towards Nick and the job he was doing. Yes it was slower than a few of you guys wanted but it seems to be missed that we're a year into a global health emergency. It seems to be missed that the Ecuador government has been very lax issuing the permits for water and drilling activities - other companies operating in the country had the same the issues.

I take exception to this being all on Nick.

That is all.