RE: Remain on standby25 May 2025 11:04
Oppo the certain shareholders you hope don't screw it up have a substantial holding.
What would you rather have , some difficult questions asked which they are entitled to do with the hope of finding some answers keeping them content with their holding.
Or they sell up , over half a billion shares trying to find new hands jist after another raise.
While I'm not convinced the efforts of those shareholders involved can actually create change, I'm hopeful they get the answers they seek and become a little more content with their holding , and good for them, about time someone asked questions of the board.
There also appears to be talk of this screwing up tk , the likes of dv who was all up for a combined shareholder challenge suddenly changed his mind when proof of holdingbwas necessary. It's just a easy out.
If I recall harry recently said that we have gone past the point now of no returns , it's gone too far , I doubt 11 shareholders can change that based on being unhappy over a raise and seeing their investment value drop.
And newsflash there will be more dilution before tk pours gold , and company making no money only has limited ways of generating funds for Harry's fat wages , the market is the easiest way.