Mf 201721 Jun 2025 15:49
you took time out to write some thoughts to me and asked me to do the same, rather then pros and cons just a few overall thoughts on saudi tk and harry , could of wrote more but haven't got the time i'm afraid.
tula kapi
for me the fact institutional investors have contacted harry or he has sold it to them that the project is worth investing in, is a plus in anyone’s book, regardless of how long they stay in for, it wasn’t just one investor either it was multiples so credit where its due.
ratification while not down to kefi its no doubt a huge step forward, achieved or progress doesn’t really matter, what matters, finally a stalled project can now move forward.
also,i guess the project is still alive, it’s not gone down the aim graveyard where multiple other exploration companies have ended up, shows harry has clearly worked hard behind the scenes at times to achieve this.
what’s not so great is easy its communication, a huge issue i have with harry is the p.r announced via regulated channels such a rns is not quite the same message as the unregulated routes such as webinars, the q&a and p.r such as vox interviews. and at times leaves you scratching your head, one statement will come out on one channel and harry ****s it up big time by making a hypercritical statement elsewhere.
if i listed all the contradictory statements, i would be here all day. some p.r also appear misleading, the slide on page 4 in the latest presentation titled field activities q2 2025 for me as a example of a little misleading, it shows a whole list of activities and then ticks next to them all, why the ticks??? why not just list them all, under construction it says new access road and then a tick next to it, gives the impression it’s been completed, the annual report clearly states its only 50% complete.so you have to research beyond an official presentation
it’s always been like that, 2020 annual report suggested that the ethiopian government had set aside the licences surrounding tula kapi with multiple targets, the following year it had been issued elsewhere and never seen again, same kind of terminology with konso, what harry says is very different to what happens,
i have always said tk is a good project, but why not advance it while we waited for ratification, harry has raised a unbelievable amount of cash over the years, 10s of millions, no exploration, no finance sign off, why not say to shareholders “look ratification will take as long as it takes, but in the mean time we will not stand still”.
aim investors love the drill bit to be turning, why not use only 10% of money raised to explore, 10% will give you a war chest of 4m.