Member Info for bigsmoke

as posted earlier : trader alert. guess i was spot on. again.

750 on offer

no (more) shares to buy

no shares to buy

how's that recipe for disaster coming along ????????

don't flatter yourself thinking anyone is following you.
you should be preparing......................................

.........and looks like i have a far better average than you.

what happened to the great outlook here ? .......................

chips.

ok, so when do the AMGO traders come here..........

this one. over 5p soon. must be.

never ever did I think we would be sat sub 60 without equity raise. q

the stock continues to prove it cannot grant a profit.

3p is as good a punt as any.

must be aching about now

you get called a troll for being positive now? make up your mind, newbies.

not me.

another 100,000 today

panderman - "Smokey, if that is correct why didn't the shorts decrease at the same time?"

1/ accumulation. someone/somefolk have bought the shorted shares. the shorts therefore did not have time to close. The RNS shows JPM did (buy). others might include our MTRO whales (we will soon find out of that is the case). might also include a new sub 3% fund(s). and there might be retail.

2/ close/open. the shorts might have intra-day closed out old positions and opened new positions. hence no new movement. remember, once a short has over 50% success (downside) the economics are better to close and open than keep original open.

3/ shorttracker is "net" position. so the shorts might have closed some but repositioned (sold) some of their hedge so that the net position remains unchanged.

4/ not all shorts are shown on short tracker. you know that. (a) there are retail shorts (plenty here we are aware of). (b) there are pro-sub 0.5% shorts which do not get disclosed. (c) FCA and short tracker is prone to error. remember our US shorter over 0.5%? therefore, there are plenty shorts that might have closed out without the need for a disclosure.

there are many other views.

wow.

JPM have upped their position while loaning out to shorters, subject to an on demand recall.

ergo, they have bought back some of their own shares which they have loaned out (possibly even recycled a second time) to make it even harder for those taking the loaned shares to return them either on their own accord (if the market does not go the way of their thesis) OR if they need to return them (their fund gets shut) OR (they are demanded back at will or for an event).

Each of the foregoing events in brackets is, imho, imminently highly likely.

Is it that hard to see?