Member Info for big-blue

"do you really think people are happy to hear from you?"

No. People want to make money, not have a few real world facts put up that threaten that. And I never said anybody is 'happy' to hear anything I say. But that is the whole point and reason why your picketing of the bb fails some emphatically. Like it or not, people want information on what is or might be in the real world. And whilst it is nice to be stroked and promised riches beyond their wildest dreams from the likes of you, this is the real world with real money and most looking in here know that ship happens and the earliest warning they can get the better they can make a move in response.

And let's face it. This is you you and the rest of the ramp fest boiler room have absolutely hate me. Because I respond to the dilution deniers and keep posting the latest known and most relevant published facts related to the issue as raised by your beloved ceo. You failed to ramp it, too many people reading the real world facts like I do. You failed. You look pretty silly coming on here this morning ramping the hell out of it like there is no red flag. Almost everybody else is waiting with their finger hovering over sell button ready in case the next RNS reports a financial restructuring involving any form of dilution. That is a plain fact, people are ready for the scenario and there is nothing you can do to change that now. Berenberg nailed the coffin on the ramp fest well and truly shut and the sp has performed in response. You failed.

Does that mean REVENUE is going up?

For Delta maybe! You celebrate a rival airline to IAG taking up Heathrow slots denying BA opportunities? Are you sure you understand this investing malarky?

"Hello everyone!!!!"

Overtures of megalomania! Why would 'everyone' be pleased to hear from you? You have a belief that you have manipulated people into shunning narratives that do not join in on your ramp fest and now everybody turns to you as the light, the way? I sometimes find it both funny and sad when people get carried away as you do. Funny at delusional some can get, and sad that if something lands that destroys your rainbow the downer for you is most likely a very dark place, again.

You may have a couple of followers, but for the overwhelming majority on here, this is about money. Plain and simply. This is not a place for making a network of 'friends'. Strangers hiding behind avatars that don't subscribe and therefore incapable of even making private correspondence. Your ramping is so obtuse, it shows itself for what is. I hope that I have been of some service in ensuring the indecent ramp fest has been answered by ensuring real world facts are used to answer the denials and obfuscation that the rampers often post.

I do think you and your few followers would be better setting up your own private chat room on ADVFN were you tell each other how fab everything is and shut out the real world in full. If this public open bb is such a problem for you, why are you here?

'doing the opposite of what this BB said'

Another of the old classics, along with 'tree shake', 'mm holding back', 'nice little top up there' and 'catch a falling knife'.

I what have I 'said' should be done? Switcheroo? Not buying whilst there is a red flag dilution risk? A brief glance at the chart for the year rather bears out my strategy. Since day trading up to spring, from around the 155 to 210, then out looking for the switcheroo, the sp has simply walked all the way down back to the mid 150's with a brief spike to the 180s when the 'emergency' RI was dismissed ut the share red flagged for me from that point and look where it is back now! It can be argued that a spike was missed mid September, but when a ceo says they are in discussions about financing options it means other form of dilutions are possible so I'm more than comfortable with staying out until the refinancing is clearer.

The Fool is mainly an add platform. The only point of interest with this article is that the idea of takeover or merger has been raised. Normally the Fool tags onto stories shate holders are latching onto and desperate for any comment to vindicate their investment choice. To that end the Fool is famous for posting completely opposite narratives just days apart. But this time, the Fool is leading the pack. It is one of a very wide variety range of possible events that can considered at least as credible. But the list of credible events, is rather long

".The last sector to return to normal trading.A no brainier."

Copper, I thought it was a no brainer back in January. Day traded up into spring, but then things turned into a headache, then a migraine, then a stroke! The big opening up for big sp gains just got drawn out until it was so thin there was almost nothing worth the risk. And since the big one, US routes announced, after a tiny blip positive it has nose dived. Recovery is going to be very slow in the sp, if there is any left. I think this is going to be only about short lived spikes for smash and grab day trading. The recovery has happened. Now the consequences of the debt level across all airlines needs to be approached, including fund raising, mergers, disposals and insolvencies and all that world wide.

Yes novice, I have the measure of JBrie. He is of no consequence. Claims to be involved with a US project yet had posted pre-test flight his connection with Cranfield flight. It was to be a game changer. Anybody who knows anything about dealing with cryogenics below liquid helium temperature, hydrogen gas down to 17% concentration and the explosive energy of H and O will know these are not suitable for ordinary consumer products. Just look at the trouble the rocket scientists and engineers have! Kerrrrr boooommm....... He's not an engineer on whatever project he is connected to, that much is obvious. Sounds like a salesman blagging it - Arthur Daley comes to mind.

"The RI is a red herring. There may be a RI of course"

I am going to fill a glass later and raise a toast, "The RI is a red herring. There may be a RI of course, but nonetheless, it is a red herring - cheers!"

"The RI is a red herring. There may be a RI of course"

!

Yep, that is what Taky posted. A 'red herring' that might 'of course' happen.

"misleading to post out of date broker notes claiming that the risks around IAG are the same now as in early September. They're not."
Show us the updates. If circumstances have changed, then the broker notes will have been updated. In fact, instead, we had this a month later.
"It also downgrades IAG to "hold", given heightened equity
dilution risk which may weigh on shares early next year --- Berenberg
https://www.lse.co.uk/news/IAG/berenberg-upgrades-easyjet-downgrades-iag-5yatu7tvtabidw2.html"

So the September notes are hardly out of date when a new broker pitches in with the point 'dilution risk'.

I ask again, does that mean a companies results are 'out of date' a month after posting? No, the information stands until it is updated. Identical to the broker notes. Until they update their words, they stand. It is not for some stranger on a public bb to arbitrarily declare such comments 'out of date'. There is no decay time or half-life for broker notes, news articles, editorials or other such like reporting. It is valid until updated.

I, big blue, am the devil incarnate to be hated and despised by all and sundry. I am to ne filtered, ignored, picketed, abused, trolled and rejected. All because I persist in correcting misleading posts that repeatedly made by a boiler room gaggle. Call me Churchill if you can make historical parady.

Jtan, you are not allowed to post on this bb this weekend by order of the bb Junta. It is a show of strength and bravado against the mighty Big_Blue.

R_P, you are not allowed to post on this bb this weekend by order of the bb Junta. It is a show of strength and bravado against the might Big_Blue.

The references are posted again because they were denied once again. As long as people are intent on trying to mislead that the references are obsolete or no longer relevant, THAT will be answered with the last known updates from the sources themselves. Perhaps, but on Monday, you should ask the other posters to stop denying the fact. Opinions on when and to what form or not a dilution may happen id fine. But trying to pretend 'it has gone away' is plain wrong and will be called out every time I am able. too. Now put me on filter and join the picket!!

Istabarq and all, Please note you are free to post at any time of day or night according to the LSE rules. You are not under any obligation to take instructions or be bound by posting limitations imposed by control freaks and trolls who seek to diminish your freedoms and overtly moderate the public boards narrative through bullying and coercion.

You will hear many here say DYOR, do your own research. Sadely, if your independent conclusions do not match theirs, you will be subject to intense trolling, abuse, negativity, filtering and open campaigns to persuade people to shun and stop interacting with you. So, DYOR with the RI information below, but you may want to be cautious about revealing your conclusions [although we are approaching remembrance day for the sacrifices made for our freedoms, in this environment freedom of speech and freedom to hear opinions does not apply it seems].

Here are some referenced sources for you to DYOR on the RI discussion [I call it the dilution discussion because ultimately it is any form of dilution which is worst scenario for pis]. If you can find any revisions to any of the referenced quotes I am sure everybody would appreciate the updates.

"""We have revolving credit facilities, we are analysing other ways of financing the group so we have alternatives before we [consider] another rights issue,""
https://www.reuters.com/world/uk/ba-owner-iag-not-planning-tap-investors-funds-sunday-times-2021-09-19/
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/we-wont-tap-city-for-emergency-funds-says-ba-owner-luis-gallego-mnz6szjtm

Sep 2021
Credit Suisse
https://www.proactiveinvestors.co.uk/companies/news/960029/british-airways-owner-iag-target-price-cut-to-reflect-increasing-rights-issue-risk-says-credit-suisse-960029.html

HSBC
"Lobbenberg [head of European transport equity research at HSBC] added that the timing of any potential capital raise by IAG could be linked to an announcement on reopening the US border, which is now expected in December"
https://www.thisismoney.co.uk/money/markets/article-9980907/BA-owner-soon-raise-cash-shareholders.html

Goodbody
"Earlier this month, easyJet tapped investors for GBP1.2 billion in a fully underwritten rights issue ... Analysts at Goodbody and HSBC said they believed the British Airways parent would follow."
https://www.morningstar.co.uk/uk/news/AN_1632125541714351000/press-iag-will-not-tap-investors-for-recovery-funds---sunday-times.aspx

Oct 2021
** It also downgrades IAG to "hold", given heightened equity
dilution risk which may weigh on shares early next year --- Berenberg
https://www.lse.co.uk/news/IAG/berenberg-upgrades-easyjet-downgrades-iag-5yatu7tvtabidw2.html

Nobody is talking about buy or sell recommendations. Why are ou bringing that up when he subject is possible dilution.

As for the cep making misleading statements, there is a huge caveat posted,in the last update. And the ceo quote was no ' emergency' RI, and then went on to detail options wete being looked in order to avoid one later. The more you try to twist it around, the mote you draw attention to the words said as posted many times. You can't pretend it isn't there. You're making a laughing stock of yourself now.
And what's this about me being from BA. Ate you fishing or something? I have never had any role in any airline or anything connected with travel, retail, airlines or the like. The Times interview is unequivocal. A fourth broker raising the threat of an RI a month after the other 3 is very obvious.

And an analogy with a weather forecast? Eh? Weather is dynamic. The broker comments were checked, vetted, signed off by legal and published. They have not yet been updated. The target price or buy sell notes have never been part of this discussion.

Just who the ell do you think you are instructing people who they may or may not intetact wuth. People are not under your control as you wish it and you are the outsider.

That quite curious Taky, if a broker is positive, in any way shape or form it is trumpeted repeatedly. Just like you did. As they are not the narrative you want to hear, you therefore belittle and dismiss as not relevant. Those statements are representative of the company and the companies reputation. They ate therefore defiantly not throw away comments as you want them to be. To make such a statement that a business needs to do a rights issue, is a very big statement that could have a significant impact pn the target business. For three to make the statement just can not dismissed, no matter how much you wish it. And then a fourth broker adds their voice. It can not be twisted away. And until IAG releases details of the review or the brokers issue new assessments, nothing has changed no matter how you want to wish it away. It exists, it is fact, it is live.

R8. A RTSC at atmospheric pressure replacing the copper wire grid will stop waste from transmission from power station to point of use. Currently the waste is about 40% of all power generated. The consequences for fossil fuel generation are quite clear.

The current state of research for a suitable SC are cupperats in ceramic form. They are know as high temperature SC at the temperature if liquid nitrogen and are used extensively in medical scanners and other specialized equipment.

If there was proper research budgets commensurate with other climate change research projects then the progress towards a practical SC to replace the grid would be a far better use of research money wrt the return on reduced co2 emissions.

So why isn't that done?

I remember doing stuff on cooper pairs and playing with SC during my undergraduate physics degree. I do known what I am talking about!

Not sure how I can have any egg on my face. All the above is verifiable fact, including the failure of the climate change lobby to press and demand major extensions to resryarch in the area to find a RTSC to replace the grid.
FOLLOW THR MONEY, OR RATHER WHERE THE MOST MONEY CAN BE MADE!

Methane tax for cows? How about a x-dioxide tax on volcanoes, or countries with active volcanoes. I mean, what are they doing to stop all those emissions?

OK Takya, you are posting nonsense. Nothing posted is out of date as there have not been any updates to any of the notes yet. Do results fade and become 'out of date' a few weeks after they are released, or do they remain valid until they are updated? The broker notes are still valid along with the CEO comment until they are updated. We are all waiting for the results of the financial review and I am sure when the conclusions are released the brokers will comment and those comments will then be the most recent.

The first three broker notes are early September, the CEO comment a week later and Breneberg a week or so ago. I could hardly have been posting them for months.

You keep posting the broker price targets. What has that got to do with the notes? I have never referenced any price target form any broker ever. They are generally meaningless. But the comments, as I copy when required to counter false posts that there is no financial review or dilution is not on the table, the comments are the part being referenced. It is a poor attempt at misdirection to try and impose the targets over the comments. Don't apply to the magicians magic circle for membership, you haven't got the green thumbs mate.

If this is the extent of the assault on air travel, then it would be a modest affair and absorbable. However, I expect other very significant impositions to be put forward and forced on countries to adopt. If you are not allowed air space access because you aren't clobbering travellers with taxes and quotas, you have no choice but to apply whatever draconian restrictions the hysterical cult leaders apply.