Member Info for barwickman

Yes I think so

well MR X seems to be positive.

i don't think you would of had to communicate with an CEO about revenues as that has been said already but fair play to you for doing so, think Leaps best assets are the online casino/slots but they have also spent a lot of time on the virtual side of it, but for me this part of Leap is defo for the USA, our high street names are being targeted for our technology they don't want the high street shops, so Seed must know by now which is the best road for them to go down surely, is it 1 an IPO 2 wait for an offer for Leap or 3 just scale down our % and the move on with our daily business, we have to much paper value in Leap and as of yet no returns and at this rate it could drag us under, where an investment fund with no to little money we need cash in the bank to attract these new start-ups otherwise they will go elsewhere and the market knows this

maybe there is no bone to throw ?

Doggo don't worry about it, i would of thought most will get what i meant as the English language is for most on here easy to understand, and as the brain usually fills in the blanks when reading i cant see a problem, well only for one or two, but that's usually the know all's to try and say look at me I'm so clever, but then they usually have no common sense and are very much blinkered as we have on here lol

brilliant Mat your wasted on here, i suggest you get back over to twitter lol, talking of twitter i didn't get your post this morning it started , i cant just come i to work anymore, don't tell me that was a mistake was it :-) or is that just more strange poetry?

thanks Doggo :-), don't really need to debate it as its just one of the thoughts i had regarding Leap, I'm sure the board of Seed have a plan on Leap and i just hope it benefits Seed and its shareholders this time round, GLA.

yes maybe top line Mat i should of put a comma after do this, i must apologise for that big mistake but I'm just sat in the car killing time.

well try again Mat I'm sure the penny will drop sometime :-)

my only problem with Leap is, can if they wanted to put an IPO together do this as Ed said its very difficult and so many stumbling blocks in the way as they reach all parts of the world, now if one of the big boys want it for themselves what will it do with all the other clients, could they buy Leap and run it as a separate company ? , but if they did that there letting the rivals have a share of the market as they are now using Leap Gaming so what's the point, i just hope Leap don't get caught out in no mans land, it might be good holding 44% of Leap for some but for me its to much of now Seeds portfolio and needs scaled down, and its one easy way to raise the much needed cash we will soon need to move forward, so for me just sell our 44% and let whoever takes that interest deal with it, we've done this before so why not again, well that's one thought.

https://www.proactiveinvestors.co.uk/companies/news/963570/888--to-take-us10mln-hit-after-netherlands-licence-loss-963570.html

https://www.lse.co.uk/rns/888/q3-2021-trading-update-5k72ilwh5rrhthl.html Well worth a read especially the bit about gaming revenues and in house developed games

don't know what happened there lol, as i was saying, but what's not happened yet is a tabled bid for Leap yet or has it?, surely it can only be a matter of time.

sniffing, digging, salivating and verbalise, what you been eating this morning lol, yes many theory's out there and I'm sure someone might of mentioned out there what might happen, but whats not happened is a tabled bid for

yes this could be a good sign for Leap Playtech being snapped up, i did post earlier this morning that an offer was in for Playtech at 8.34am , I'm not looking for a pat on the back or a tick up but now that post was removed, bit strange to remove info but saying that it was just before school lol, anyway got to go again got roofers here doing a winter check for us.

no Moni they wont they will think of it as where spending cash for nothing lol, but many don't realise or don't want to you need to spend money to make money, this is why CF has always said companies like doing business with companies that have cash in the bank.

remember Jim this publicity is good for ORPH no matter whoever prints it and how often its printed, no such thing as bad publicity especially when the company name ORPH is mentioned.

And your another one who always reacts to an O’Donnell post, so does that make you more stupider for doing that ?

thank the lord ODONNELL is still here.

now now doggo don't get me started I've not said much today, I've let you all do the talking today and look how the boards ended up lol.