Member Info for Balanced66

Small mention:

https://uk.finance.yahoo.com/amphtml/news/5-best-uk-pharma-stocks-115722398.html#aoh=16033869468287&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&_tf=From%20%251%24s

Brighty1 wish you well in your future investments at least you still have half here unlike some who sold out completely.

There were people selling out at the £9 level to go and invest in the dddd share - selling a winner with profits galore to back a share based on a "hunch" and you know how that has turned out. That's the story of Aim people make the money and then lose it. Although people haven't lost it completely in the other share.

I'm still here as I'm looking to the future and not the past and I still see plenty value. But people have to make their own decisions. You don't have to always listen to bb but you will work out who the trustworthy posters are but you can also consider the external expert advice and that has been positive.

Gla and dyor.

Still people selling at these low levels. When there is such good value then it's best to ignore the paper losses as they are not relevant. We have some good investments so with a new management team hopefully the share price will start moving in the right direction as well.

There is a solution we could send A4UK there he is doing a fine job on the Gdr board talking about cognitive dissonance! Just joking.

Until they have a product they are your typical Aim company promising big and under delivering.

It's difficult to put a value on a company 4-6 months from now when the testing landscape may have changed with more competitors.

They do assume they've got it in the bag if it was so easy they would have released by now imv.

Wilson63 Thanks for the regular updates from Twitter which people like me who struggle to use it are grateful for.

These buybacks are usually to spur a share price into action. No longer needed imv. It seemed to be insignificant also.

Apologies if already posted.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/coronavirus-endemic-lockdowns-david-heymann-inquiry-b1203099.html

Oh so you were pointing out both exchanges were down - we can all see that so why the attacks on Sharehunter3 then on the basis that he does the same thing? Actually Sharehunter3 posts other good content not seen anything EVER from you except whining as Kaeren rightly pointed out.

If you don't like it you can sell no one is forcing you to hold.

Have you overstayed your welcome? You said you were selling when the share price hit £4 well it's more than doubled since and here you are still.

That's out of order Surfie abusing a fellow poster.

Kaeren was kind in her words to you. I've been stronger in my views as far as you are concerned.

How come you are most active on down days and this is your usual post - you have been posting similar since I've been on this board. Where's the positive comments and some analysis not even analysis then but comments about the massive contract win?

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/oct/19/covid-vaccine-will-not-be-available-in-uk-until-spring-says-vallance

https://melloevents.com/about/

Simple and quick? Steps similar to PCR test?

"TEST METHODS
The test should be operated at room temperature(15-30?).
1. Place the extraction tube with opening facing up. Press the extraction solution bottle to
drip 6 drops of extract solution into the extractor tube without touching the edge of the
tube.
2. The extraction of specimen: Put the swab had collected specimen into the extraction
tube, hold and press the swab head against the wall of tube with force while rotating the
swab for about 10 seconds to release the antigen into the extraction solution from the swab
head.
3. Removing swab: Squeeze the swab head while removing the swab in order to remove
as much liquid as possible from the swab. Dispose of swabs according to biohazard waste
disposal regulations.
4. Install the nozzle cap onto the extraction tube.
5. Loading: drip 2 drops of extraction solution into the sample well of the test cartridge,
and start the timer.
6. Read the results at 20~30 minutes. Strong positive results can be reported at 20 minutes,
however, negative results must be reported after 30 minutes. If positive signal appears after
30 minutes, it should not be reported as positive.
.......
14.The performance of this test has not been evaluated for use in patients without signs
and symptoms of respiratory infection and performance may differ in asymptomatic
individuals.
15.Sensitivity of the test after the first five days of the onset of symptoms has been
demonstrated to decrease as compared to a RT-PCR SARS-CoV-2 assay."

Looks like it's discontinued:

"Anumso Gold Corp ('Anumso')

We have agreed with our Joint Venture partner at Anumso, Desert Gold (Ashanti Gold and Desert Gold merged towards the end of September 2019), to seek a buyer for the Anumso gold project. We have had discussions with a potential buyer and will announce the outcome in due course."

https://www.investegate.co.uk/goldplat-plc--gdp-/rns/quarterly-update/202001220700065579A/

But I agree Gdp is undervalued - its market cap is half its annual sales.

Stockopedia have this as one of their "Superstocks" which is their top ranking:

https://www.stockopedia.com/articles/rank-a-super-stock-for-your-portfolio-13328/

Yes you always get these limitations - the same as the Abbot lateral flow from a few weeks ago.

How are these tests simpler and faster than quickly taking samples and sending to onsite Q16/32 for 2 minutes or so results per test at full capacity?

The public do not know the limitations of these current lateral flow tests as the government isn't explaining things properly other than catchy headlines like "15 minute rapid tests" ( the leaflet gives a longer time).

saintpeter7 you're better at this than me. Thanks.

I think this is the test in the tender as I took the wording from the tender notice and this was the first Google search item.

I thought it would take you to pdf - it's the first item in the search results.

Is this their test that the government are going to use? It doesn't take 15 minutes and looking at it quickly looks like a few steps to undertake before you get the result.

Also not for asymptomatic people? So the government are planning to trial it to see if it will work on asymptomatic individuals?

cdn.website-editor.net › filesPDF
Web results
Innova Medical Group Inc. SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Rapid Qualitative Test ...

An old article from July that suggests it is one continuous wave. Scary!

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/world/2020/jul/29/one-big-wave-why-the-covid-19-second-wave-may-not-exist-coronavirus

https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/world/2020/oct/17/covid-reinfections-to-be-expected-as-virus-spreads-say-government-scientists

Not sure if people have read the above article?

A vaccine is expected to be 50% effective. Also people can be reinfected like the common cold - the common cold is caused by a corono virus.

Testing will be required for next year and perhaps on a similar scale for the year or two after that - no one really knows but testing is still likely to be needed in significant numbers from 2022 onwards as well imv.

Nova does no need endless covid income to grow - it has a plan as set out already.

But no-one knows about covid and it's duration - most people in March/April didn't think we would be still facing lockdowns and restrictions at this time. Most people thought there would be a second wave. There has been no second wave it has just been spreading and increasing and continues to do so - bit worrying and unlike some of the past pandemics which had second or third waves.

saintpeter7 someone mentioned this also a while back.

It would mean there was a ready supply of machines in place already and income generation soon after from sale of consumables and service contracts etc.

So quick acceleration to profits.