Member Info for badflaw

The numbers do not lie
AM : *Burn £250m cash per 6months. They have £120m cash left .
*previous loss 90m . this half £220m
*pay £290m per year in interest on debt with no profits to pay it.

most of the report is bluster, waffle and distraction.
home finances : if you spend more than you earn and now only have 3 months overdraft left until its maxed out
who cares you got a ten percent Payrise, free sky tv and 5000 clubcard points.
your bankrupt unless you borrow more ... until that cash runs out or earnings exceeds outgoings

explain how posters personally benefit from negative posts. i hold a short position here and i post negative data (because the data is negative) .
please explainn how posting here is to my financial gain?

"Anyone constantly posting on this board is NOT your friend. They are manipulating your decision making for their own gain.

No one posts constantly without personal gain. Some of it is comical."

cg isnt saying. the report states ams finanical position.
how do you pick undervalue shares when you don't understand basic company numbers?

the measure of a companies solvency is cash reserves and cashflow NOT the current share price.
the conoany burnt quarter of a billion cash in 6 months and have one hundred and something cash left.... so will run outbof money in 3 months

im gobsmacked. Far worse than I expected. (and I expected a very bad reporty hence shorting)??

July 29 (Reuters) – British luxury carmaker Aston Martin on Friday reported a bigger loss for the first half of the year, hurt by rising costs and supply chain snarls.

The company posted a pre-tax loss of 285.4 million pounds ($347.99 million) for the six months ended June 30, compared with a loss of 90.7 million pounds a year earlier.

apologies wrong thread.
this was my reply to your post claiming cg is being paid to post negative newsflow to worst performing share in the ftse
is it lack of knoweldge or emotional attachment to the share that leads you to believe anything anyone says on here will influence the share price on a company of this market cap?

cg posted with actual data on it.

if you disagree with the data and interpretation of such data. please supply a reasoned counter argument

he hasnt updated all his trades on his website for years .
heres excerpts from his

5th may newsletter

I shorted Card Factory. Can't understand why it went up after the statement and looks
like a business in continual decline.

Indeed if you remember last time I said Joules, Superdry and Card were all empty and devoid
of much anyone really wanted to buy when I went to Windsor and am short of all three.

Big profits now at the Joules short, more in a mo on that.

Card Factory's report came with a lot of guff about how well it'll do by 2026 but I ignored all that
and tried to find the net debt. Which was very hard!

It was all hidden miles down near the end of a very long statement helpfully found by my highlighter
system - see naked trader 5 on how to run the highlighter.

Total debt is a staggering £263m. Talking out lease liabilities it is still a massive £107m.

Given profits of £11m this has a long way to go to be a company worth much.
from his 25th july newletter :

I'm tempted to add to the short in Card Factory. Might be ok if it was an online business but no-one really shops much for cards anymore and the youth of today have given up on Xmas cards.

I sat opposite a store yesterday at peak time while waiting for the mrs to get her nails done.

Not a single sale with two staff on their phones with nothing to do.

It has a horrendous debt and if you add the lease liabilities a crazily
high one compared to profits.

The head cheese is leaving, doesn't look like a happy leaving either and you wonder if something isn't right there.

The big question is: will he get a leaving card .. sent via Moonpig

what do you mean ive never posted before? are you saying people many only post once the day a share is listed? that people may not discuss or inveat in a share unless its brand new to the market ?

I did have va short position opened at 62 but my stops closed it at 52 last week as part of risk management, and a made a nice little profit.

as im sure your aware if goijf long its prudent to enter on dip, if the markets having a bad day. when going short its preferable to buy on a spike without newsflow , it limits losses in case of a mistake.
So in summary no it is not me "smoking"
*you are incorrect about the naked trader
* im not short currently as a stop loss fired and im waiting for a spike to re enter : basic risk management.
* my posts are negative as the data shows such.

please provide some data that counteracts the negative data . id rather listen to others point of view and be wrong than lose money

from your previous post i do not believe you have learnt that lesson yet.
yourbthebone acting negative instead of attempting to belittle those with data and opinions that dont suit you as a holder. bring some postive fscts to the table. explain to me data made you choose to to buy at the price you did,( what price and when was that ?) and what reasons you still con

cg posted with actual data on it.

if you disagree with the data and interpretation of such data. please supply a reasoned counter argument

is it lack of knoweldge or emotional attachment to the share that leads you to believe anything anyone says on here will influence the share price on a company of this market cap?

yes my short is closed as it hit my stoploss at 52. i actually want this share to spike up so I can open short ,not drop at the moment
The comments werent my own i was quoting an article by the very successful naked trader

ill repeat

if you think "paid derampers" on a bulletin board can influence a share of this marketcap and liquidity then you have a lot to learn or are just emotionally involved with this share

too early to get in yet.
*results due fridayy worth reviewing
*upcoming rights issue that will heavily dilute shares, but still leave aml with a lot of debt to pay off (look at net profit to debt )
* September ftse annual review aml has to be
unlikely 500+ ish to stay in ftse and not be relegated to aim with the consequence of ftse funds etfs pensions etf forced to sell
*lots of headwinds ,inflation ,materials, ukraine , potential gloabal recession
Perhaps review after the above has occured , let the dust settle then revalue the company sub 300p ll is when it atarts to look like value currently

m here to make money. I shorted this from 62 until my stoploss hit at 52.
id like to short it again, but looking to do so on an upward spike first .
if ive missed something that would give reason to invest that this price then I wouldnt look to short futher but to go long.
please tell me what ive missed. i genuinley cant see the value at this share price ?
Id rather be proved wrong and close a position than stubbornly tell myself and everyone else how right I am and lose money.

if you think "paid derampers" on a bulletin board can influence a share of this marketcap and liquidity then you have a lot to learn or are just emotionally involved with this share.

i fpund themt o be excellent.
why not read his book. and of ylu make enough extra profit /reduces loss by the coat of the course then th course is effectivley free and his techniques are profitable to for you.
thats ehat i did and havent lokked back since
ps his seminars are currently on zoom . do his beginner one first.
pss .if ypuve only £1000 to spend on sharws probably beat to avoid a 600£ course.
he usually buys lots of stuff on the day using level 2 dma , and those trades usually pay the course fee themselves , but again youd want a reasonable amount of capital to get your return

why do you say 340?

it does look fantastic. the extra paper helps it against the urus etc too

I've added yet more to the Aston Martin short after it rose when it got
some backing from the Saudis.

The money will help but the debt is still massive!

It's not going to make a profit for the forseeable future and without
the Saudi money would really be a bust.