RE: Price30 May 2020 22:56
One thing though, did anyone notice that twice on the QA Parry said that the gold aspect of tally isn't the main feature, but that tally is currency? Or words to that effect. It's stuck out to me.
I'm concerned they are barking up the wrong tree. Without gold I wouldn't be using tally for banking. So it isn't a currency. Its selling it to the wrong crowd by downplaying the gold aspect.
I do fear for their ambitions blinding them to reality. Parry seems to think this will be the future currency of the world! When in effect it's an investment tool for gold, but apparently that's not it, the gold bit is being a distraction.