We would love to hear your thoughts about our site and services, please take our survey here.
The inept understanding on here is actually outstanding! Relatively small shorts have been opened, and JP Morgan have jumped in, this to me is a positive sign for the medium to long-term for an SP rise.
Shorts are opening to create the very panic displayed by the PI's on here. They open small shorts as they are actually going long on the share. Shorts are opened to cause SP to remain low, sellers abundant and panic ensues picking up Shares on the cheap.
All the while in the background they have also opened a long position to accumulate the required long.
Calm the **** down it is a long established ploy to transfer the shares from the dense to the profit makers.
Hang in there - in 6mths to a year this will look very different concerning SP value.
O and by the way for those that have not worked it out yet, the whole Tender of Shares effort was also contrived. There is no-way on hell's earth did they not know this was not legal in the states. this was a very, very clever ploy to circumvent the lowering of the Divi and using this as an excuse to do so (or part there-of) to create the SP rise they are looking for. Sneaky yes, protecting the current SP at these levels with a spurious get out as to why divi lowered, equals very clever! Ask yourself did they find out on the morning of the RNS release this was illegal or did they know weeks ago, did II's not inform them of this (of course they would have done)? They knew and used it as a tool to get where we are. If they knew it was illegal why did they not terminate the Tender offer with an updated RNS separately? they just waited to throw it in the information with the lowering of the Divi, clever stuff as gave them a legit get out which did not cause any real panic with a drop in SP (the other way round would have done).
Look past what you see and understand how the game works and what they are trying to achieve. They want the UK investors out and the US investors in - Simples. Either stick with it and reap rewards or sell up and close the door on it.
Well Notrex, as assumed not man enough. Still whining, investing clearly not for you, mouthing off, and not got a scooby. All this "Sunny Boy" reference trying make yourself look superior, lol. When actually looking a bit limp and pathetic.
Buddy give up Investing it not for you. Shouting people down shows your class, in reality ZERO.
I will leave it there. You are a serious no-mark and filtered!
Aye Notrex don't see an Apology yet from your abuse you gave me on 2nd Feb Buddy when I said Divi would be reduced by 50% due to current level being unsustainable? I believe you said i was drunk, was drinking dubious substances, I was vermin, a clown and basically did not have a clue what I was talking about! I know you absolutely believe you can shout everyone down on here like you are a Guru or something, but you have proven you have not got a clue - See below from 2nd Feb!
My Statement Feb 2nd:-
Notrex - markets want stability, all big players that pay divi's operate a model on stable Divi payments. DEC does not have that with a 20%-30%+ Yield - its is unsustainable.
If cash generation were stable, Divi was lowered to more market averages then Share price would rise. There would be a stability around the company's finances and future direction over a longer term.
So Yes prepared to buy you a pint of what I am drinking. :) (NOTREX 100% CORRECT WASN'T I)
Your Obnoxious Reply:-
OK Axe - you answer me this question. Recently a syndicate of Banks gave DEC a clean bill of financial health and confirmed and extended their credit and headroom. These cold, clear-eyed Bankers would have had access to any and all information they required to reach their conclusions - unlike you and your shorter mates? Their unanimous assessment was that DEC's financial position warranted their full continued support - an assessment which would have been based on unrestricted access to key inside information. Now the question is: why should I believe you - clearly either with your own short or in the employ of shorters rather than the professional Bankers?
Now you can repeat what you are saying until hell freezes over - but the more you repeat your mantra, the more I will become convinced you are simply shouting your own book. If it's that bad here, sell up and fu*k off - and leave the rest of us poor souls to our doom eh? But you won't will you sonny boy - because you want to spread FUD at any and every possible opportunity. You're just another manifestation of vermin.
So No, the dividend does not need to be reduced - because the divi no dependence on the SP - except in the minds of those drinking copious pints of dubious substances!!
Axe - You just dont get it do you? The high percentage dividend is a consequence of a reduced SP - not DECs ability to pay it. You really need to put the bottle down sunshine - you're clearly pi55ed. I'll take my cue from the consortium of Banks who recently gave DEC a clean bill of health - but I guess you know better than those institutions as well? Jeez - what a clown.
Be a Man and offer up an apology! You did not know what you were talking about, did not have a clue, I tried to School you at the time and you just became abusive. So stand-up give an apology and walk away and leave the investing to the Big Boys aye :)
I can wait, but can always post the rest of your crap posts on this subject, 1 everyday f
Notrex:- Lol
NOTREX - Lol that made me laugh! It like the dead Parrot Sketch in here lol.......
What garbage is that then you deluded Fruit-bat? What you still think this would be sat at 35p then after 2 years will ZERO tangible news or updates? Lol
What always happens after a short being cleared out? A bounce if its unreasonable attack with no foundation where is your bounce Fruit-bat?
Also you think I destroyed the SP from 35p lol? What you mean the very company you defend did not destroy the SP in 10 minutes of opening in February 2022 from £1.75p to 11p? You are sad, deluded and full of the most useless reality facts that post on Aim. All I did was hit the bounce
twice, on the way up and on the way back down. Even I could work out the dynamics out of what was happening sat in Milan at the time!
Fruits - Shorting is not a crime, and if you believe investing is too actually make money there are several ways to do this, one of which is an opportunity to short a company that bounced to mid 30's after a failure and was always
going down to pence.
Now you either understand that and whether it was shorted or not, this was always going to go down anyway FFS! It was just a golden opportunity to make some easy money if you savvy enough.
You go on about shorting like it is wrong? Well how do you explain the huge short attack against NMC which then ousted a huge multi billion pound scam? Was that wrong, NO it exposed thieves and disgusting people running a FTSE 100 company making billions out of nothing. That is why shorting is not banned as it levels the market when morally bankrupt people are running it and operating in it.
So get a grip, stop being a complete Bell End and learn why shorting is not bad or banned, instead of peddling your imature amateurish investment knowledge.
Gavster you are wrong! Total pot iels £42million in Divi or tender offer combined. RNS states there is an allocation on what can be bought up in tender offer and full request to sell shares is dependant on take-up.
The max they can spend on either or combined options only totals £42 million. This is inclusive of the 5%premium, which is worked out and calculated for.
Example: 100% take-up of tender offer say at £10's per share, they will allocate £39,900.000's to buying all the shares and the remaining £2.1 million will pay the 5% additional payment for purchase of those shares.
This scales down depending on take-up and people just taking the Divi as non-sellers or tender being under subscribed.
There is NO second payment, NO more monet to fund the 5%, it all based on Tender subscription, spilt between Divi take-up.
That's it, that's the deal! FFS!
Wait for it! Waitttt foooorrr itttt! Wahoo!
The last meaningful RNS was released on the 24th Dec 2022? and even that was buried on the worst trading day of the Year - Sprinter Results.
Do you get the feeling that a company that raised nearly £90 million's months before are basically siphonong off what is left? I mean to not communicate anything meaningful in over a year to the very same investors that handed over that cash, and which they are continuing to line their pockets and pensions with is beyond disgraceful.
Only Tommy and his Chums think this is normal and continue to ramp, which is slightly weird in itself.
Yes I know Aether - Don't feed them - Green Bin! Yawn..........
The 5th Shorter declared and jumped on-board yesterday however, prior to RNS release this morning. The declaration of reaching the threshold would have to have been made/declared by 3:30pm this afternoon for it to be communicated this evening after close.
I wonder what they are thinking now the RNS has been released the morning after they reached their position. :)
Well to be fair Fruits it better to post once in a while on a 5p Share that you are having a punt on, than every single day like you and your offspring do on here (For past 2 years I might add). Savvy investors always post every single day aye buddy on 5p Shares that have dropped for 24 consecutive months, and is the only share they post on, or are invested in Lol. Your comebacks are so immature it makes me cringe.
O punt you mean - piddly £5k for 100,000 shares. Mmm worth a small punt to go long.
Not worth 267 posts and counting each month though lol. My world not that sad, and defo not worth it on a share worth around 5p (ish).
But you enjoying yourself each day of your life, so wish you all the best lol.
Tommy lol - Don't have to count them just click on your name and Wow monthly posts show-up (Thought you would have known that by now, you are on here practically 24/7) - 267 posts for you to be exact just on Synairgen in past 30 days. You got to be pretty sad investing all your money in one share that you comment on repeatedly for 2 years that has dropped over 90% of its share value. That's dedication folks lol.
Mmmm I wonder why you are only interested in one share and a failing share at that. Doesn't take too much brain power to work that out does it Tommy-Tippee_D
Aye Tommy, how's it going trying to prop up Share sentiment and interest for The Board and TFG with 200 to 300 posts a month? Lol!
Lol
The shorter hedging bet that Share price will drop on Divi day to the tune of 30+% and then sell off and smash even more.
We all better pray that Dec throw BB,'s at it and Bulls turn up OR Financial Statement us a doozie, because we could be looking at a smash and grab at really low levels here.
Grab yourself by the nuts time potentially.
You keep telling yourself that Notrex, same thing Afren investors did, same this NMC investors did, I believe they were shorted to oblivion due the old 'IT too good to be true" scenario.
You either take the shorter seriously or you become a loser, bit like what personality disorder you are displaying.
Keep banging on about 'they can afford it" Shorters seem to know different and no big investors bailing them out. Read the runes buddy.
That is the POINT NOTREX - SP been hammered by Shorters! That is what shorters do, they pick companies out that Market has little confidence in and what is being communicated out from the Board! they do not just stick a pin in the investment index and go "yeah that one will do". It is targeted for a reason. If they get it wrong other entities pile in to burn them, is that happening here or is it being crucified by the Shorters?
the reason is, Company not believed on Capping Costs long term, not believed that 20% to 30% Revenues can be returned in Divi's over an extended period and so something will give. That is why originally I stated over the "Medium to long term"
They can get away with doing this for a period of time to give something back to the LTH's with the slide in Share price, maybe a year or marginally longer, but shorter's are here to stay unless a direction change happens. It will happen.
If huge Divi's make good business and investment sense why don't the Banks all pay 30 to 40% in Divi's? Why do no other Oil Companies Pay these types of Divi's qtr in and qtr out? Why do the Top 100 Companies on indexes only pay between 5 to 10% on average? Reason it's bad for company growth, bad for confidence that higher % divi's can be sustained (It cannot), and bad for Banks looking to invest in the company as a large proportion of Cash is being handed over to Shareholders when they are the number 1 creditors to be paid out if something goes wrong.
Jeez God! You need to get out of this game bud!
Notrex - markets want stability, all big players that pay divi's operate a model on stable Divi payments. DEC does not have that with a 30%+ Yield - its is unsustainable.
If cash generation were stable, Divi was lowered to more market averages then Share price would rise. There would be a stability around the company's finances and future direction over a longer term.
So Yes prepared to buy you a pint of what I am drinking. :)