Member Info for apunter2

Yes please remember

“By the other hand, please remember that Directors bought at nearly 0,7.“

Hi extrader, after your post today about possible future scenarios I took you out the green room ..

Again agree totally but if your someone on a handful of post isn’t it nice to know someone in the know bought £1.5mill worth, biggest green flag of them all

IMHO

Garyfromleeds, brilliant, delighted for you,

Good luck and best of health to you and yours

As per
“I have lots of concerns over this share and it's so called investments by the BOD. I am still struggling to work out how share transfers between different investment vehicles can be construed as 'skin in the game'.

Skin in the game... there is an RNS that shows a direct purchase from the chairman ..
As for your comments about do your own research
I stick by them and suggest you do some too about this but.
I am not being aggressive and no antagonism meant

I am not here to persuade you of anything but I can only follow the links to these transfers now the update RNS has confirmed the indirect and direct institutional investing.

Good luck

Wiggly, see what people are saying to gage sentiment , then use these boards for links to research, ask question on here, there are good people who will answer.
But most importantly believe no one. Me included but use the replies to lead you to your own research
Not just about SYME but also learn the market.
The rules companies have to follow. All that knowledge can be used to filter the dross on here
Including Mine .. knowledge is power. iI will know more about SYME than you ever will .. will know Moore about rules than we ever will ..
and they are buying .
But go find the evidence to that statement

MrEx... if it is any consolation Non executive Chairman bought £1.5mill @ 0.70p

Think how he is feeling ...

hes’s not bothered in the slightest.... he can’t sell for a year, he sees value at 0.7p ...
your help thread I responded to. Hope you read it and understand the cycle we are now in... retail being replaced by institutional investors.

Let’s hope not to many flee and don’t come back

Dvdavidson. ii don’t think it’s overpriced,,, Lol

Again extrader, good post, But they paid something as your post indicates

‘To be clear, 'sales or 'purchases' involving Consideration Shares 'off-market' are 'worth' whatever the 2 x parties decide.’

I know you love my however,

However, AZ is using shares for a collateral. Not three weeks later we are informed of the off book deal where did the money come from?

I will refer you to the update RNS .. direct and indirect ii investment

‘directly or indirectly - into the capital of the Company, pursuant to confidentiality agreements in place relating to the business alliances which are on track.’

Note- on track..

Extrader, this not even 6 months listed .. Look at the time scale of all these RNS .. what about 3 weeks apart ?

Extrader. Just seen your post on my layout, great post and delighted your contributing In the thread About possible future scenarios rather than focusing on the past.

I would syndicate first, you don’t want funders thinking they are frozen out.. Or thinking exclusivity are cherry picking the rounds.

But it’s a hard one to call

Time as ever will tell

You yawn but you want to buy

‘Still way overpriced this share, waiting yo get in ar 0.38”

How dare we talk about something positive when you want your buy in price

Or just another way to stop discussion..

Thank god a decent thread at last lol

You should also think on this from the update RNS

‘which are individually requesting exclusivity for the securitisation notes issuance, and which are also remaining available for strategic support to the Company for the next funding rounds.‘

Note -rounds

Lots to put into this equation for the board make their judgement

AIMHO

How many times have I said it ... aim or main it’s all bad

Also chairman buys £1.t mill .. oh at 0.7p lol ..

Weathergeek also HL shows doubling of new accounts opened .. so twice the problem lol

MrExec. Look at my post on Sunday. The long one Lol. I tried to explain the relationship between ii, mm and retail
Why this will fall and how mm make it fall .. all was written IMHO

When mm filling orders all bets are off, charts don’t matter. Only thing that matters is filling the orders with retail sells

Hold or you lose.. simple

We know it is institutional investing.

From 10th RNS

5. Institutional equity agreements

By virtue of the huge underserved market and the unique - proven - inventory monetisation service, the strategic Partners above have been asking to SYME to invest - directly or indirectly - into the capital of the Company, pursuant to confidentiality agreements in place relating to the business alliances which are on track. These agreements anticipate both broker to broker transfers and open market transactions as recent trading has proved.

Posted already but incase any one missed it in the noise . Lots of ads so make sure you scroll to the bottom

https://budgeting.thenest.com/disadvantages-high-institutional-ownership-stocks-32624.html

However,please do your own research

This gob sh**te in his own way makes a point

Also middel east links them direct to china.

Hoping the end game here, is exactly like that
For instance some entity in HK can buy inventory in USA.. say U.K. client can get funding from.. Australia

Why not ?

Quote

“ . Remember that savvy institutions that you want to follow would not be that obvious with their investment.”

Food for thought only, just for newbies and to see what your dealing with now

If interested, read to the very bottom As it looks like it stops for ads half way through

https://budgeting.thenest.com/disadvantages-high-institutional-ownership-stocks-32624.html

Despite the title it’s not bad, but explains much..