RE: Management5 Dec 2020 14:39
@setanta I'm personally a bit more relaxed about that as the strategy is sound and implementation is via 3rd party contractors keeping OPEX down. Accounting side seemed to have earned its keep with recent Placing at reasonable rates.
My current overall GWMO assessment is:
> Strategy = 9/10 set in RNS Nov-2019 shift from Copper to Gold/Silver licences was needed
> Cash position = 8/10 as £2m cash for £6m MCap Explorer is excellent place to be, but no one likes dilution!
> Prospective licences = 10/10 faultless as proven history of high grade gold/silver extraction in good postcode
> 2021 Works Programme = 7/10 ... seems sound & well funded, but not a lot of detail to give more confidence
> 2020 Works Implementation = 6/10, but tricky to know for sure as so little evidence/output provided and low 2020 expectations set. A presentation summarising findings and linking to 2021 Plan would be good
> Comms = 4/10 as decent, timely, informative & regular comms needed. Easy to fix and needs some thought on BoDs part
> BoD = 5/10 some doubts remain over past delivery (pre Nov-19), current comms & creating shareholder value
> BoD costs = 5/10 as lingering doubts over cost structure and value for money. Sort delivery & Comms and we might be more forgiving (maybe)
> Operations = 4/10 as having to rely on 3rd party contractor availability now an issue especially if BoD want to accelerate 2021 exploration with new Placing funds
> Other Opportunities = 0/10 can we have some decent shareholder value created from existing licences first please?
Overall 5/10 in my view across 10 areas. BoD please just sort Comms, provide presentation on 2020 plan results to inform 2021 plan and ditch other opportunities gets GWMO to a solid 7/10 awaiting shareholder value being generated from well implemented 2021 programme of exploration/production works! That's not too difficult is it?
AIMHO APR