RE: Clarification requested29 Oct 2024 06:26
Donald caused more collateral damage to the share price than PG's ill- advised Vox Market interview π£π£
Revelations about zero testing action in Guercif quite rightly touched a nerve and collapsed the nerve of many share holders, and rightly so.
The Lonny departure has left many people confused and concerned also. There is something very wrong with the lack of explanation of what really happened to make the MD of the company suddenly leave.
PG chose a very limp interview platform in Vox Markets, one I presume he had to pay for to waffle his way through the interview that appeared orchestrated with an extremely weak interviewer on tha panel. You might as well had Sandy Bugler asking the questions he was so poor. Reading questions from a pre-written script you'd think was handed to him by PG beforehand.
There was no passion, no engagement, no hard and probing questions and certainly no interest from the host.
Paul burnt his bridges last time with Proactive Investor's platform as it didn't go his way. This time he got his way and once again failed to explain himself adequately and the resulting decline of the share price was evidence of this.
With Guercif on the back burner for at the very least 3 months it is going to be difficult for the share price to gain any traction and I predict it will head back lower to the low sixes and more than likely five pence region in that time frame.
On the next pump a capital raise will be the outcome π©π©π©