Member Info for AIMtodeath

By your OWN admission you believed imminent failed to be of relevance after 2 months, therefore after 2 months your decisions to hold/sell/buy became your own and solely your own and no one else is to blame but YOU.

YOU also had 559 days to think about your opinion of imminent before you would go below the price that imminent was used...... In ANYONES little head that is time enough to know imminent was certainly not happening.

No one is defending the BOD use of imminent (naively assuming things could move forward at apace) but disconnecting the idea that after 2 months then having 559 days to transact when you yourself no longer believed imminent would happen, you can't hang your decision to keep holding based on a comment made over year and half beforehand. What utter stupidity.

Cyber truck going into production.... All these new options bring instant new market buyers to EVs. Big batteries too.

Mahenge east licence areas they do not have now plus the maconde prospect area.... Those are under application by ACP subsidiary now.

Oh Steve boy..... let you into a secret, there is a buy for every sell and a sell for every buy. So say on a high buying day you complain the price doesn't go up and manipulation by MMs......well if a MM has a sell order for shares they might have more shares to SELL than the RETAIL are buying and therefore the price does not move until that MM has sold those shares into the market....which they probably negotiated a large single buy from a SELLER, which is why sometimes after all those buys not moving a large delayed sell shows (post MM moving them on). And Vice versa.

Price moving 'assistance'....I say assistance because they need retail to act to continue to move it. They drop the BID, it then needs weak hands to sell to drop further, MMs do not move BID 0.5p with no retail assistance (expect on news and liquidity point is far removed from closing price). MMs are there to 'make a market' so sometimes when it is quiet they might push a little in a certain direction looking liquidity (fake drop of BID or fake increase of ASK)....where more transactions occur (believe it or not even indices can move like this). Once you head in one direction it will get opposing trades to stop it or reverse it, i.e. increased liquidity, if you move down buyers come in, if you move up sellers come in.

Until you look beyond the retail buys and sells you will never understand how and why price moves or not. If you are just looking at L2 it is smoke and mirrors and means very little. RSP tells a far clearer picture on availability and from whom. MMs are not magicians and do not overlord price movement....they can assist and prod but ultimately retail transactions will drive the direction (unless on the MM side they have more to sell/buy than the retail are....aka supply and demand)

Caddy MMs do not move the price, demand and supply does.

MMs make money if the share price stays the same, in fact it's the easiest for them, just sit there and make spread.

I agree Seis, LSE WANT discussion of ANY type as long as it creates posts. The trollign posts are designed to create reaction by purposefully putting out untruths that need correcting etc.

I also know people that regularly breaki the the chat rules and rules that say if broken it is banable from the site and yet after being called out more than 20 times for libel they still remain on the site..... You would think LSE would like to distance themselves from the these kinds of posters because they are responsible for moderating the posts at the end of the day and it would push away casual users from participating, it seems counter intuitive, but they must like angst over decent conversation.

Time in arguments applies to everyone and the wasted emotional stress it brings. Better things to do in life....

Before the deal was done it was trolling over the deal won't be done. Now the deal is done, the deal is crappy.....yet this was never mentioned before, just now it is all that can be used by them.

Deal is done, money is paid, more money will be paid, significant money going into the ground by better miners that would never have been achievable on ARCM own...... The risk is always there in miners that nowt of commercial viability is found, thats the chance one takes (funny, tin pot mining group AA is up for spending a load to find out themselves..... must be idiots and don't know what they are doing, should have listened to the keyboard warriors on LSE) however there is significant money being spent to find that out or not, it has promising characteristics and local successes so not like plugging into unknown and unpoven localised areas. As sure as apples are apples, ANY drill cores not up to speck keyboard trolls will be on it like a rat up a drainpipe.....with told you so (yep drilling holes in the ground to find the amber nectar is not easy so hardly a revelation!).... There is 3 years to drill a lot of targets, not every core will be 10,395m of pure copper, but you never know what they will find until they have exhausted that money. It is not over on the first 10 drill cores that is for sure, albeit some people will be reaching for their tissues so they can whack one out whilst they keyboard warrior telling you the end is nigh.....

Takey,

a: what is your beef and with whom?

b: what is your goal/purpose of posting in this fashion

c: have you not got a life to get on with if ARCM isn't your thing, life is short to be spent trolling people on a social media platform. Imagine the lost time not spent with a partner or children to do this.....you will not get that time in your life again, once it's gone it's gone.

Think Fulmar is a:has spent most of their time fighting trolls that it is hard to not be and b: perhaps did not see that you only got an account last year so despite been in ARCM for years you wouldn't have been active on the board and seen China issues.

Spelt B O Z O......

Not obvious your intent at all Amtech..... Second large sell after BID moves up and 5 mins later (after days of silence) Amtech posts with negative sentiment...... Not a coincidence AT ALL....

Tardis, MB has stated that the Gov are glacial in working with, however that being said the deals and the work required to fulfill them is entirely new for the Gov dept. They have gone from nil partnerships to having to put board members on every deal and process plenty of legal paperwork per deal. It's like your boss at work calling you in and giving you 20% extra work and work you've never done before. They are still finding their groove in terms of what the deals look like beyond the straight up 16%, room for manoeuvre in respect to jobs and business completed within Tanzania.

Beside that I think they have also concentrated all their efforts on the lead companies to get them over the line and operational before they take on anymore work load/companies that essentially need to wait for BKT and the area's development.

Baby steps..... No point having 20 deals and none of them financed and producing. BKT and civilian population structural development with added benefit to further companies doing business from the same region bringing in more income/jobs to the local population is desirable but none of that happens unless BKT gets going.

I also see them not wanting any other company to progress ahead of their darling and well advertised project..... Especially if they ain't going to develop the area. Tanzania see this project creating a graphite district and to become the biggest producer in Africa not too far from rail to one of the biggest and busiest ports in Africa.

It will not be lost on buyers that the outbound ships will be cheap to utilise too for delivery to market as many ships leave their empty otherwise.

So that aside the benefits to ACP are real and not to be sniffed at. The EV narrative, battery narrative and now the Chinese news it's nit like the timing to progress has got worse but only better. SA bank after extensive due diligence on BKT, their product (comes from same rock as ACP's graphite) and Tanzania risk to splurge $60m more than our entire capex yet we would still deliver nearly 80% return of BKT in stage 1.

The other banks/lenders etc tend to come more quickly after the first one plunges and they see the risk they'll take on.

ACP doesn't need Tier 1 banks due to smaller capex and short pay back allows for high interest from other sources of finance. They don't need to do the same level of due diligence because Tier 1 banks have already spent 2 years doing it. Think a Aussie finance house will be too stressed lending ACP $30M given the capex /stage 1 return ratio of ACP sat next door BKT that International banks are going to put in up to $60m in one tranche.

FEED 1 has already been done FEED 2 is more confirming 1 and dinner details, the DFS is mainly changing figures, the Chinese restrictions may just put a rocket up offtakers queries and push for deals..... over next 6 months things will be very different here.

Bravo.... That seller that smacked the bid this afternoon gave you nice liquidity and a good price for the day. Out with the old in with the new.

The whole way up traders will take their X percentage and we'll encounter stale bulls as we recover previous price points.

Rover, whilst the news floating about is not directly attached to ACP it has significant implications for ACP.

Chinese restrictions on export - ACP is outside China and bodes well for US, Asian and EU interest in future.

BKT finance - and progression thereof means the district is developed that we would operate in bringing bug advantages to capex, opex and ESG credentials for all those non Chinese future buyers.

These things are now falling into place and I hope that ignites the fire in ACP.

All your posts suggest is you are a bitter trader that despite having 559 days of profit failed to action a sell and now trying to take your anger out on the company and other investors.

It was good fun in the old days Pumpky, I’ve lost count how many times I’ve bought and sold this stock........

What took you 559 days not to trade it in profit this time??

So lets get this straight Amtech's problem has nothing to do with their decision not to sell for 559 days in profit and 559 days losing position.... So how is it a problem when it had no affect on their value of shares? Or just lashing out at the one and only thing they can think of....

Merchant -If you look at the presentation with the stages of the DFS, the more costly items will be further down the line when it comes to more drilling etc. Stage one is all about pre-qualification, enhancing the project plan to increase project plant size and tonnage. This will lead to offtakes and funding in order to deliver an updated DFS and enhanced NPV. So the $2m should get them far enough down the line to add value before moving forward with the more costly parts of stage 2 and 3 of the new enhanced DFS.

NOTED.... By front loading the DFS with DFC money you create a condition in SP value that can mean less dilution or put the project to a point that other parties would help finance?. I still think any money from an offtake for no equity and paid pre DFS completion is a big ask and wholeheartedly agree that if you pull it off it would be kudos to BRES, they do sell the project well there is no question about that. I will be first to say I have often hoped for the best outcome but mostly got closer to the worst outcome so apologise if I don't think cakes come with cherry's on top.

Short you specifically said they could get the funding all from offtake and you 'thought' that is what the company was pursuing in your first reply....soooo your new line of insulting doesn't wash when this is what came out of you.

Merchant that just says you do not have to match the payments as they are made....nothing more does it say. I refer you to the 50% and explain to me what that means, no one has managed to do that yet. Was that a mistake, an error, it's not what they mean?