Utilico Insights - Jacqueline Broers assesses why Vietnam could be the darling of Asia for investors. Watch the full video here.
“Proof as always is in the pudding.” B3ast - The proof of the pudding is in the eating. That’s how it started out anyways.
My own thoughts, it almost seems set up for no email tomorrow for those with company issued shares - hence the next step of emailing Cloudtag after April 2nd. What then? He could have just asked those who are not nominees to email their details to the same address last autumn.
Reminds me of the suggestion back in written letter days for troublesome customers to write in to the company, Department WPB. For those who can’t guess - it stood for Waste Paper Basket.
Leftie friends lol, I pay a lot of property CGT in case you missed the dig at our future Deputy PM , Gawd help us..
You go to the same finishing school as Angela Raynor Hubba? Scum indeed. Don’t forget to pay the CGT bill when you get your rewards ;)
I remember the ultra bull dougal being very wedded to the FCA registration for a role at an entirely separate legal entity having great weight for a positive outcome here.
Don’t see the relevance myself. The legit brokerage Madoff ran was no comfort for the victims of the unconnected fraud. Erstwhile chairman of the NASDAQ to boot.
It’s all supposition, only one simple thing needed to stop it…$50m
So, SB Corporate Finance advised Cloudtag, say £500 per billable hour? No wonder the ‘deal’ took so b****y long. After the ‘deal’ was said to have completed there seems to be a lot of billable hours from this ‘agent’ - whoever they may be??
Playing devil’s advocate, the overwhelming evidence seems to be brokers not being contacted in sufficient numbers to lead to the need to contact certificated holders as per the update that requires concurrent contact. Using the term RNS for what Amit puts out could be misleading. The Regulatory News Service is not available to private companies, those companies with main market listings have many checks and rules to comply with over what is RNS’d to market. At the bottom of the pile, an Aim listing needs a NOMAD to be responsible for the veracity of at least the basics such as funds with a bank, completed deal etc. The naming of this bank, who will obviously make no comment and will undoubtedly take client confidentiality more seriously than Farage’s bank, reminds me of the time named Hugh Risebrow as a new hire - something he had to open an account here to deny!
I know it’s already been done before, but my suggestion for the agent in the Cloudtag movie would just involve buying a wig for whoever is playing Amit..
Penultimate paragraph; if there was, say, a clinical diagnosis of a mental condition then the updates would be a very good example of it in action. It is supposition to say what could indeed be evidence of such a condition ‘is clearly seen’ in the updates without any other reference, I’d guess it would get an ‘objection, your Honour’ in court. Correlation not being causation and all that.
Perhaps he is creating the impression that he is mentally impaired for an end game that is a less worse outcome than being found to have carried out a deliberate fraud over some years? (Although ‘Catch 22’ could argue that pretending to be mad is in itself a form of madness). I put forward to another poster who was claiming something to the effect of ‘everyone knows Amit is a poor communicator’ that, no, what we know is nothing he says ever seems to come to fruition. The effect of spinning a convoluted tale out of nothing could be responsible.
Posted in the spirit of adding an extra viewpoint.
$50m, multiply that by 1000 and then some , that really was a corker of a fib by Bernie Madoff, erstwhile Chatman of the NASDAQ. There was a brilliant line in ‘The Wizard of Lies’ where he was offered the opportunity of getting a lawyer before interview, his reply; ‘I know the SEC rules better than most lawyers - I wrote most of them’.
Some speculated a while back that it was family money funding the payout rather than a commercial deal. Would be fraudulent to attempt such a thing and of course there is no evidence to suggest it. However perhaps Amit is under the impression that he can get family funds to make the payment? In one way or another he is rather inviting the supposition that something is amiss with his grip on reality.
Things not happening (as were stated as due to happen) is evidence. Also always worth stress testing a theory, would it increase likelihood further if there were a dozen more prevarication updates? Why is 24 credible and 36 not if the answer is no?
Reminds me of the ‘Blackadder’ sketch with the old sea captain; “Opinion is divided - everyone else says it isn’t, I say it is”
Platypus, I made that point months ago - I’m incessantly being asked for these proofs (including from ii who I’ve been with for 10 years plus) as I exit a residential property portfolio. Begs the question though, why does Amit come out with utter BS when he could play that card with some credibility?
So, two people refer to ii putting out a corporate action notice specifically saying NO contact and then someone else, presumably getting the exact same thing, takes it as game on..
The point is these execution only brokers are being made to look like the bad guys by a fantasist time waster and they are putting out a counter to his ludicrous website updates.
A recent example of the virtual impossibility of getting any sense out of today’s ‘customer service’ operations ( I use the term loosely);
A few weeks ago my broadband was playing up. I don’t use a landline, but plugged a phone in to test and found it wouldn’t work. Had already logged a complaint about the response (or lack of after reporting the fault). I was speaking to someone who insisted I was ringing from my landline as he could see the number on his display.
I explained more than once that I had a choice of pressing ‘1’ if I was ringing from my landline and ‘2’ if I wasn’t. As I wasn’t, (and couldn’t if I wanted to), I pressed ‘2’ and then entered my landline number followed by # as requested by the system so it could identify my account.
There you have it, a customer facing fwit who didn’t understand his own company’s tech and wouldn’t listen to a customer who has worked out the problem and explained it to him in words of two syllables.
Ah, I see Soyo, my apologies.
Duntmatter, that would be like setting yourself on fire to make someone sweat a bit.
“from today” Doesn’t that contradict the specific insistence from Amit that shareholders must all be contacted simultaneously (as used to justify a previous delay)?