We would love to hear your thoughts about our site and services, please take our survey here.
Teaye72
We might be seeing the start of a market!?. …
You’re not bored with me, you are absolutely obsessed with me!! My name appears in a very great deal of your recent posts (at a glance 15 times in recent days) without those that are aimed at me not including my name, AND even more over the years, and it’s definitely not me engaging you! You are clearly obsessed!!
Why would a self-proclaimed turncoat spend so many years running this share down causing descent and disruption on this bb if they are still invested? Or is it the advocate you have a problem with??. …
I have been party to the debate on this board for a very long time. There were periods for years were I was virtually the only person on this board posting anything. Over those years there have been many serious naysayers, but they disappeared one by one.
As this boards longest advocate I’m very well used to being attacked by those that weren’t able to stay the course and that probably lost a lot of money, rarely if ever by genuinely interested hopeful investors! ?
Since the company’s status changed with the news of ITIL and more recently the additional larger Investors ANY post about what went before regarding the company’s successes or failures are imo absolutely 100% pointless.
I’ve said this many times recently that I’m currently no longer interested per se in the company and until such times as they rekindle my interest I am only interested in the SP.
I’m happy to continue to discuss the company’s future with everybody, but won’t be getting involved in feeding the naysayers hunger for negativity because of what might or might not have gone before. It’s pointless and irrelevant.
Not sure of the point of a fragmented history lesson, as that’s exactly what it is History!
What went before is not in the slightest bit relevant to what we are led to believe is the current status quo.
Pointless negativity!
Oh dear GW you’re still hurting! Let me explain something to you about your indisputable fact about the Sumbawanga weather, they are disputable!! Still deluding yourself about your research and my research, but yours has to be indisputable lol
I’ll explain something else to you. When I invested in this share the weather was furthest from anybody’s mind and didn’t become an issue until they had problems mining. Bearing in mind other mines all over the world seem to manage ok. Rest assured there’s not a single person invested in this share for as long as me that ever researched the weather as part of any due diligence, and I doubt you did either.
Tell us how the Great indisputable weather researcher didn’t know an elementary fact about the company’s long term strategy, the one on the first page of the website.
Tell us how, even though you’ve been invested for years that you didn’t understand the Interconnector and the power pools source of electricity.
Tell us how you thought the CFPS was the Sumbawanga Sub Station.
Tell us why you advised in your informative Consolidation Post “More Shares Issued, Dilution etc etc……and PIs lose”
And you have the front to talk to me about the weather. Answer the questions!
———————————-
GW Early January 2021
“Yes, there will be those that argue it makes no difference as the MCap stays as is, but in reality consolidation just allows the share price to get chipped away at again, more shares issued, dilution etc etc.....and PIs lose”
24,696
“limited appreciation of the potential commercial impacts of the climate and resulting weather patterns” I think you’re on drugs! Lol
25,694 posts and that’s the best you have. You still think your research on the Sumbwanga Weather is somehow superior because you said it is :))
Read my 14:37 we ALL know about your research (or lack of) lol
Clearly you and your mate are obsessed with failure? but we know your view.
Guess you’ll be claiming you said so when the SP goes up!!
Oh and I forget about the Lind death spiral posts, I’ll have to dig them out !
Really Sausage, tell us all about the facts of your $3.5 billion Australian Nuclear Power Station research!
I genuinely don’t know how you can show your face after such ignorant attempts to de-ramp, and you are clearly deluding yourself if you think you know facts!
Sausage
Sadly you don’t even understand the irony of the irony lol
No there was your ignorance of the Edenville Long Term Strategy. Your ignorance of the intention to fully monetise the Rukwa coal deposit via development of a mine mouth coal-to-power project providing electricity to the Tanzanian grid system, and your ignorant Consolidation post to which you chose to ignore when challenged as you have a habit of doing, but seemingly again sos’s protector popping up at every opportunity I think even your ignorant shortcomings don’t compare to the $3.5 billion Australian Nuclear Power Station research lol
Sausage
You have the gaul to question anybody’s facts, when you post the most ignorant statement I have ever seen on this board in ten years of your negative drivel.
You quote the $3.5 billion Australian Nuclear Power Station when attempting to de-ramp the Sumbawanga CFPS debate, and when challenged you said:
“It doesn’t matter what research you use”. … PMSL!!!!
pi
They will get paid!
Alternatively the larger investors currently are getting sweet fa !!
Sausage
We all know your way of thinking is failure and negativity, added to the repeated denial of documented statements. Says only what we already know !!
Did I say failed? lol
If no Friday RNS they will have failed, not failed all of Friday as I’m sure they are doing something, but failed their Friday objectives, but when challenged I’ll say I didn’t say they failed all of Friday as failed and failed the two different words, there’s a big difference you know!. …
esquimo
I totally agree, and have posted the much the same many times recently. My only criticism is that nobody appears to be in any hurry considering that there is no benefit to most of them unless the SP rises. …
Full post
RE: If they.....30 Jul 2021 17:32
“It has to be Monday, otherwise they will have failed”
—————————-
Perhaps somebody would explain to sausage that posting the “FULL POST” (twice) is posting the facts, and while they are at it please explain to him what snippets means! lol
Sausage said:
“We all know aerial you take snippets out of people's posts to support your view”
Full Post
If no RNS on Monday - 30 Jul 2021 15:45
“I'll consider Edenville to have failed in their July objectives”
;))
lol
Reminiscences of dueling banjos!
Sausage picked esquimo up for misunderstanding him saying: “ I didn't say July was a failure”?
Guess he forgot this:
If no RNS on Monday - 30 Jul 2021 15:45
“I'll consider Edenville to have failed in their July objectives”
RE: If they - 30 Jul 2021 17:32
“It has to be Monday, otherwise they will have failed”
Poor old sausage doesn’t know what he said 5 days ago lol