Stefan Bernstein explains how the EU/Greenland critical raw materials partnership benefits GreenRoc. Watch the full video here.
From the 29 Sept RNS...
· Key milestone objectives through to the end of Q1 2024 include:
o Feasibility Study update - End 2023
...etc
Like many, I've been here for years and my patience is now wearing thin
GLA and happy easter
This morning I have read "...it would be helpful if EEE put to bed the ambiguity from that old RNS re rights to minerals other than Cu/Au."
Where is the ambiguity? Do some of you not read RNS's? Empire and Century went looking for Cu/Au and in doing so found an upside-down mountain of Ti. (btw, previous Cu mine workings at Pitfield suggest there is still Cu to be found)
If mineral sands had been found (they were not) then we would be having a different conversation. Mineral sands are unambiguously the property of Century only. This is stated in the 06 April 2022 RNS.
Where is it written that Empire has no rights to minerals other than Cu/Au? Empire's RNS's are impressively detailed but it seems that this work is wasted on some of you.
https://www.lse.co.uk/rns/EEE/acquisition-of-highly-prospective-cu-au-projects-c4gpxmzm6bikj63.html
Ask yourselves some questions. Maybe start with...
- Would respected and highly skilled professionals be leaving high paid jobs elsewhere to join Empire if the licence was ambiguous? These people are not dummies.
- Would Empire be mothballing and abandoning other Aussie projects if they didn't have Ti rights at Pitfield?
- If copper explorers find cobalt, does that invalidate their licences?
- Ditto if gold explorers find silver?
Not only do many AIM investors not read but seemingly they don't think either.
Here's the correct answer from the RNS you failed to read...
"Century retains the rights to any Mineral Sands resources discovered within the Projects and that these do not form part of the separate Project joint ventures between Empire and Century."
Since Pitfield Ti is sandstone and siltstone hosted the mineral sands clause is void. Pretty simple but you still failed
Ask your supervisor if we can we have some smarter boileroom trash?
Answer the question Glennhalfwit
Do you not have this question on your boileroom script?
Explain what is the basis for Empire losing the exploration rights at Pitfield. Go on...
Do you know the difference between sand and sandstone?
From today's RNS:
"From Empire's preliminary metallurgical studies, it is anticipated that Pitfield ore will be amenable to conventional leaching under atmospheric conditions to liberate the titanium. There is a considerable amount of metallurgical research work that demonstrates the successful leaching of titanite, using low temperature sulphuric acid or hydrochloric acid to dissolve the titanite and liberate the Ti into a liquid phase."
This is a big deal. H2SO4 is cheap at just around $60/mt. HCl is still cheap but just aroud $110/mt last time I looked. This compares to hydrobromic acid at >$2000/mt.
Empire seem confident that a low temperature, low cost acid leaching process is applicable to Pitfield's titanite. I have seen no evidence to the contrary.
The recent flood of boiler room half-wits need a new script. Fast.
I have lost count of the number of times that Empre has stated that the Ti mineralisation is hosted in sandstone and siltstone. These are sedimentary rocks. ROCKS.
Yesterday somebody started a thread claiming to be concerned that Empire might lose the Ti rights at Pitfield because it may be hosted in mineral sands.
W-T-F
The thread which followed so so moronic that those involved cannot have been serious. It seems there are actors on this messageboard who have sinister intent.
On top of the mineral sands moronathon we seem to have plain disruptive posters as well. One of them, I believe, is not as thick as his written English would suggest.
BTW I welcome all viewpoints if they are reasoned and/or evidence-based
Manlord my friend, I'm minimizing my time at what is left of this forum so I'll keep it brief!
I was amazed at the lack of guidance given on ore processing at last week's presentation. I too have read the science on hydrobromic acid leaching of titanite and that is why I asked question 17. I sent the question in when it became clear that Shaun was happier to talk about effing geology than the pertinent subject of processing. Sadly my question was not answered during the session. The 25% SP loss since this session was avoidable IMO. Hopefully SB has learned from it.
Publishing the Q&A's is helpful. It's too early to know if the SP has bottomed but the 300K trade at 13:19 was mine and it was a buy.
GLA
This place has gone down the IQ 5h1tter in a matter of days thanks to the resident imbecilic troll and 2 or 3 idiots who can't resist feeding him. You know who you are. You have destroyed this place.
For the first time in 15+ years I filtered the 3 most obvious cretins here resulting in an improvement but now this place is just a hollowed-out messageboard of filtered messages thanks to these 3 idiots.
Over the past 10 months I like to think I have contributed my fair share to this forum. I have also profited very nicely from my conviction in EEE. Sadly, it is no longer worthwhile posting or even reading here on a regular basis as life is too short. I can stand on my own 2 feet without wasting any more of my time at this intellectual cess pit.
Sincerest best wishes to the fine people who have navigated this journey with me in 2023 online and to those I have been fortunate enough to meet in person. We'll meet again I hope.
PS. AIM is mostly garbage - don't believe the scammers
Hot on the heals of the excellent bulllish pattern last week, yesterday's presentation triggered a bearish engulfing pattern which was confirmed by today's close. Nice work Shaun.
So, we're now threatened with a continuation of the 2 month downtrend. My own opinion is that the low 7's will offer support once again if needed. But if Empire does another presentation which fails to reassure the market about the economic processing of titanite then all bets are off.
On another note, why are some of you still feeding the troll?
Dusty, it seems you are posting things here again.
Yesterday you did say you were leaving this board until the summer. I've come across personalities like yours before so I didn't believe a word of it. So I filtered you yesterday. In 15+ years of using LSE messageboards you are honestly the only poster I have ever filtered.
Congratulations.
I even had to go looking for the filter button for you.
So I am blissfully unaware of what insightful, intelligent commentary you are sharing with folks here.