Member Info for 2reincarnated

that's what shares have a habit of doing, knowing that there are enough of them out there. Oh well, could be worse, in that some people are worse than mugs, thinking Ladbrookes is about to be taken over.

you say Citigroup and JP M will buy from £1.20 ''down'' what do you mean by ''down'' ? because ''down'' could be sub £1 or even 80p!!!

if that's what people think then all I will say is ''will the last person to leave this planet, please turn off the lights''!!!

your both right and both wrong!!! Ladbrookes is not a HMV, but may increasingly be operating in the same toxic environment as HMV did.

can it eventually hit sub £1?

are we being stalked? what planet are you living on? RSA being stalked? with a ''hole'' that big in it's finances, who would stalk RSA? I know a ''holes a hole'' especially after a few pints, but I woud'nt touch the hole that RSA is even with a barge pole!!!

From there who knows where it will go!!!

if it goes to £1.20, it must be for reasons which can or will take it below £1!!!

like I said when RSA warned on profits last month, there would be a ''false rally'' to draw in the ''mugs'' The harder it bounces, the harder it will fall. I still maintain a new low will be reached.

this BB, please turn off the lights.

You make it sound as if Mothercare need to ''go back to the drawing board'' When in fact it is more about ''getting a new drawing board'' I still feel this is the beginning of the end, it is a one dimensional company, in a 3 dimensional world!!!

That is what Mothercare has been for a long time!! As a concept, the idea of being a ''kiddies'' shop in the light of competition from Asda, Tesco's etc was always going to catch up with mothercare. Really think it should have never got to £4 in the first place.

The value of a share is related to the number of shares in issue and a snapshot of it's finances ie earnings/profit/debt etc. Unless these factors can abe addressed first, issuing more shares will simply knock the SP further.

Because RSA is not strong enough!!! Moreover, with funds entering the ''coffers'' there would still remain questions over whether the injection of funds would boost growth or be a ''quick fix'' In contrast to say Thomas Cook, albeit a differnt company. They had both a rights issue and a placing, this was against a background of solid results. If all a company had to do when they were in trouble, was to issue more shares, would everyone not do it? Ask the likes of HMV!!!

should not be ruled out provided it is well planned. Quite simply, should RSA need funds subsequently, the rights issue would be known as an ''emergency rights issue'' my goodness the markets hate them!!!

in circumstances in which RSA finds itself, the SP eventually defaults to it's ''historical low'' My understanding is that is 68p, as seen in late 2002.

Merry xmas & a happy new year!!!

At 2.99p I held 10,000 shares!!! I topped up twice. Ask anyone on PF BB who has been the most optomistic about PF and most will say I have!!! I say PF £3 BY EASTER!!!

I hold 20,000 sahres in Premier Foods at £1 ish. Therfore in profit. I will but 20,000 shares in RSA at below 70p. Nothing wrong with talking down shares, whole idea of this BB. Unlike your mate Hickfromthesticks who resorts to the use of bad lanaguage.

To ''draw in the mugs'' from there it will in increments drop to where it ''rallied'' from!!!!