Clear Leisure Share Price (CLP)

The money due in from Mediapolis is already in the accounts as receivables so it won't improve the balance sheet when it comes in. It might however reassure investors more when they see money coming in rather than debts to be chased...

It's fair comment to say some post more detailed research than others. Some have the time (retired?) to do the research. Somez like myself have a high pressure job and little time to research as much as we perhaps should so use the BB threads to assist us ..I am more invested in the accounts and financial statements and acknowledge others here are better experts in Italian law and the history here. What no one finds productive is the mere poster attacking which serves no purpose and I myself have allowed this to effect me and to respond in kind. Let's try to stick with the facts and rational opinions going forward

Ah Ltd Axis, before I go any further let’s make anyone who reads your posts crystal clear that you post all the doom and gloom for your trading position, what I find truly amazing is the fact you can’t leave this share or it BB alone, the reason you single me out is because I get in the way of your agenda and not afraid to call you out

1. The Mediapolis money is well over due. We have an uncontested 1st charge so maybe you can explain why we won’t be getting it in your view as a non invested bystander

2. Maybe you can explain why In the latest interview FG is wrong with being confident in collecting the money ? Here is the link to refresh your memory

https://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=i&source=web&cd=&ved=2ahUKEwjm_pDo3NTkAhWdA2MBHapWAzoQzPwBegQIARAB&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.proactiveinvestors.co.uk%2Fcompanies%2Fnews%2F902668%2Fclear-leisure-ceo-confident-of-a-positive-outcome-to-its-litigation-issues-902668.html&psig=AOvVaw3E19RFsDBVumwTjVEns-OX&ust=1568702090428410

3. Now how can everything be built into the SP when our Mcap is the same as the 1.15 million due from Mediapolis, that takes no consideration for any of our assets and ongoing cases, I’m sure NIGEL will be able to give you a breakdown of our Nav and how we are trading way under

4. Funny how you only start double or triple posting especially when RKB posts good solid factual posts, do they get in the way per chance, I’m sure others will have noticed also

RKB rightly advocates good research. What often bewilders me on here is the way some posters use the bullet points of others research without clearly doing any research into the legitimacy of what they are posting or repeating. That is my main bugbear here and on most bbs relating to AIM shares.

Forgive me for using your earlier post of 16.47 as an example Spary, but it sums up what I am trying to say.

"With the Mediapolis money" :- this is long overdue but the latest news from the company update was that it has been requested but there has been no reply and they might have to resort to legal action to recover it, even though it is owed to us and should have been paid a long time ago.
" a win or a good settlement out of court for the latest claim": Sipiem (of which we are the majority shareholder) still has not obtained a proper legal agreement to be recognised as a major shareholder in TLT, and therefor entitled to a % of ongoing and historical revenue from Ondaland amongst other ventures.. The legal claim we have just bought from the liquidator is slightly separate against the previous board of Sipiem and for historical financial mismanagement and potential fraud.
"when the bond holders convert" :- persuading bondholders to convert their bonds for shares at a substantial discount obviously helps the bottom line but the current sp is lower than the cost of issuing a share in exchange for that debt at whatever conversion rate and I can't see any bondholders agreeing to convert at such a low share price in any case. Surely the higher the share price the more attractive it is to exchange bond debt for shares.

Anyway what I am trying to say is you joining three bits of information together as if we have a triple whammy of good news coming and in fact there is no guarantee of any of them bearing fruit. They are all potentially good news (although the money from the land if it comes is a very disappointing outcome), but please remember the market has generally priced in all this information and the relative risks and likelihood of success and that is why we have a share price down where it is. Actual news should change that., but more likely is a pump and dump in the short term, although those that do that (and I am not one of them) need some potential good news tp build a case, not enigmatic hints that have been proved wrong once to often.

Ade2017: presumably you won’t see this as you’ve filtered me . I’ve never (intentionally ) been discourteous to other posters and have just expressed my views as I see them , and also been open that I have traded this. After all every one is trading this, just on different timescales and from different starting points .
I know my posts have often been taken the wrong way and a narrative about my motives has developed which is very very wide of the mark . But there’s not much any of us can do about misinterpretation in these forums other than at least try to respect each other’s views even if different from our own.