Gordon Stein, CFO of CleanTech Lithium, explains why CTL acquired the 23 Laguna Verde licenses. Watch the video here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
At HL, no quote to buy even 1,000 shares at advertised 7p [not live] right after the bell at 8am. [+0.72%]
But can sell and offered better price than advertised 6.9p.
So, Mr Market is at ...stand-off.
All weekend the discussion with one XYZ and he has ended with another U turn.
But meanwhile, the market makers are doing the business of buying and selling XTR stock -others can check as some other brokers may offer stocks but maybe more expensive from what one has seen in the past?
However, do check.
News, Mon 12 Apr 2021 [Day of lockdown ending]
More time for outdoors. @8:31am
7.10p to buy
Yawn. Filtered. Peace at last
What are you on above Steve, I make sh*tloads of mistakes.
Ee's worse than 'itler!
Looks like he’s using his 2 computers tonight also!
The FatherTedFeck story is actually a little sad. He posted on here weeks ago saying he sold out after the XRF results. Now, he seems to be becoming more and more desperate to justify that decision. The Chilean fairy stories he keeps producing are an effort to demonstrate that XTR is nothing special and there are many other similar opportunities. He isn't going to accept any evidence against that narrative because that would mean he made a mistake and, in FatherTedFeck's world, he doesn't make mistakes. It's called cognitive dissonance.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cognitive_dissonance
He can't buy in again, because that would require acceptance of a mistake, and he can't move on because he needs to prove to himself that he made the right decision. I'm afraid he is here to stay for the foreseeable future, so I suggest filter and ignore because rational discussion won't change anything.
To clarify, I say what I think because i think it. Not much justification beyond that! I do not, however, think XTR is a dud. We are only one 'ole into the drill campaign, and it was by no means a terrible 'ole. Let the truth machine do it's thing. My complaint, such as it is, is that XTR is overpriced compared to other comparables. If I thought XTR was cheap (and you don't want to hear what that number would be,) then I would be emphasizing the company's positives, i.e. copper is looking great for a decade, porphyries are big enough to attract buyouts from majors, Aus is a good jurisdiction, 900m drill hole is nothing to sneeze at (even if it was a Director's Special,) Anglo buyback clause is not too onerous, etc etc
But instead I think it's pricey compared to some other beauties out there. A rising tide will probably lift all boats anyhow.
Bravo, Ted, on your grammar, if not your honesty...
Because that's what I think. We'll see, I guess.
If you are doing so well investing in the other "better prospects", why are you spending so much time lecturing us on how XTR is a dud ? I mean, we are not exactly taking on board your expertise are we ?
Well if anyone can make any sense out of that, then you're a better man than I.
LittleWing, isn't that exactly what I'm doing!?? Somehow the updates just aren't that well received? Filo Mining is another ripper, i dunno if I've mentioned them here. Their market cap is chunky - mid $300m's - but I don't think we've missed the boat. It can get up into the solgold/solaris stratosphere, especially with their big oxide kicker.
LoL
FatherTedFeck- you NOW prevericate. From cu to better with cu eq, latter of which I quoted and you found to be .....[unmentionable].
So, in your NO fresh assertion of ..., you ACCEPT that your earlier assertions was BASELESS AND WITHOUT MERIT.
YOUR THESIS:
I note you say "YOU"- so you are now a professional analyst vs XTR.
What you fail to point out is XTR*s Racecourse at Hole 6 [under XTR] is only a EARLY POINT IN THE DISCOVERY.
You are pitting yourself as a layman [you never mentioned you are a household name in the investment analysis industry] against BODA/EDISON & XTR + CEO {mining engineer from Anglo-American, Mr Read, Director, Former HEAD of BHP AUSTRALIA -Africa & Mr Menzies, Lachlan Fold copper specialist. Then, there is the MACKENZIE study - supply tightness and lack of copper projects in Tier 1 jurisdictions which majors are interested in.
So, OUT OF THE 10 TOP WORLD RANKED, 3 FALL INTO THE GROUP I LISTED VS XTR CURRENTLY.
So, you think that the 3 IN WESTERN JURISDICTION is of ....?
You have a view but that view has to be CONFIRMED FURTHER DOWN THE LINE.
If you turn out to be wrong, then your social media reputation on the London South East will show 0 for Racecourse, Bushranger. In the USA, everyone is ranked by success and failure rate depending on their FORECASTS.
So, let*s revisit and until then, its over to XTR and further drilling - district is mentioned so TAKE NOTE.
With thank, it ends all conversation with your goodself.
News, Sun 11 Apr 2021.
Hurrying off so no time to edit for typos..
FTF... can I suggest you go and invest in those "better prospects" and let us know how you get on ?
News - "I have able to just locate the XTR Hole 1 details:
XTR Hole 1: 0. 3 % CU COPPER.
0. 0 2 g/t au gold
1.45 g/t Ag Silver.
= 0 . 3 3 % Cu EQ. [920m from 110m]"
Yes, you read a news release. A knighthood cannot be far away.
News - "So, in short, the CU is still 0 . 3% COPPER vs 0. 3 3 % Cu EQ.
So, a small variance only of equivalent which is NOT statistically significant?"
It's not a question of statistical significance or not. If you're a marginal project then that extra 10% potential revenue might be the difference between profit or loss, success or failure. We want the numbers to be higher, obviously. 0.3% and 0.33% is a relatively small difference, but here it just reflects a lack of gold. hmmmm.
News - "I quoted from RFC AMBRIAN:
WORLD RANKED NO 1: PEBBLE-ALASKA @ 0. 3 4 % CU [Copper]
WORLD RANKED NO 9: CASINO-CANADA @ 0. 1 7 % CU
WORLD RANKED NO 10: MASON - USA @ 0. 3 % CU"
Yes, and my problem with that is that all of those projects (especially the first two) have a much higher CuEq% than Cu%, so their Cu% in isolation is both meaningless and misleading. The CuEq% shows how much their rocks are worth in situ.
Pebble - 6.5 billion tons M&I of yes only 0.40% Cu, but it's 0.77%CuEq when you add in all of their gold, moly, silver, rhenium.
Casino - 2.2 billion tons M&I of yes only 0.16% Cu, but it's 0.36%Cueq when you add in the gold, moly and silver.
Mason - 2.2 billion tons of yes only 0.29% Cu, but it's roughly 0.35% CuEq when you add in the gold moly and silver.
Now i happen to think all three projects suck for one reason or another, and it's easy to find better prospects in other companies. But anyhow, when aiming for an apples to apples comparison, you're best to measure by CuEq because porphyries usually contain good amounts of payable gold, mo, ag etc.... Or at least the good ones do! ;-)
And you could steal his lunch money while you're at it. Or throw his schoolbag off the bus?
if everyone reports father ted he wont be able to talk ****e on here anymore
News You can waffle a lot but I will sit back and let the share price tell all in the next 6 months maybe less
FatherTedFeck
For your attention:
I have just been able to check on XTR*s Hole 1 : 0. 3 3 Cu EQ which I quoted verbatim that I saw from other poster*s post when the assay results came out.
I have able to just locate the XTR Hole 1 details:
XTR Hole 1: 0. 3 % CU COPPER.
0. 0 2 g/t au gold
1.45 g/t Ag Silver.
= 0 . 3 3 % Cu EQ. [920m from 110m]
So, in short, the CU is still 0 . 3% COPPER vs 0. 3 3 % Cu EQ.
So, a small variance only of equivalent which is NOT statistically significant?
It is NOT as if 0. 3 3 % CU EQ is made up of ONLY, SAY FOR EXAMPLE 0.2% CU COPPER?
I quoted from RFC AMBRIAN:
WORLD RANKED NO 1: PEBBLE-ALASKA @ 0. 3 4 % CU [Copper]
WORLD RANKED NO 9: CASINO-CANADA @ 0. 1 7 % CU
WORLD RANKED NO 10: MASON - USA @ 0. 3 % CU
FOR THE AVOIDANCE OF DOUBT:
From the world ranked No 1, 9 & 10, it was obvious that EVEN QUOTING 0. 3 3 % CU EQ
WOULD NOT BEAT 0.34% CU OF NO 1 RANKED PEBBLE given it is CLEARLY QUOTED AS % CU EQ and NOT % CU.
It is ON PAR WITH MASON, NO 10 RANKED @ 0. 3 % CU and No 9 @ 0. 17 % cu as above.
I also quoted: XTR RACECOURSE JORC @ 0. 4 4 % CU copper & 0. 0 6 4 g/t au gold.
From this I could deduce that the gold content is not of statistical significance ie it is 0.1 rather it is 0.064 g/t.
So, it appears to show your assertion is without merit and baseless. I only had ON HAND 0.33% cu EQ from XTR at the time of my original posting and I quoted that. Now that the two other included gold and silver is shown seperately, it has NOT LOWERED THE COPPER IN A SIGNIFICANTLY STATISTICAL WAY ie it is STILL 0. 3 % CU.
In school, if it is 1.5 it is of statistical significance. But if it is 1.03, it is NOT of statistical significance. Why? In school, one is taught that one cannot change 1.03 to 1.1 as 0.3 is not over the half way mark.
=============
DISCUSSION ABOUT HOLE 2 AND SO FORTH
Whatever comes out of XTR Racecourse Hole 2, it has to be ADDED to all the OTHER holes before one can UPDATE the JORC which has ALSO to be TAKEN INTO THE MODELLING AND CALS.
FatherTedFeck: Also for your attention:
"XTR Racecourse Hole 1: HIGHER GRADES 156m @ 0. 4 8 % cu copper, 0. 0 4 g/t au gold and 2.44g/t Ag silver [ 0. 5 2 % cu EQ] FROM 110M.
The higher grade section of mineralisation correspond well those reported from drilling undertaken by Anglo American in 2014 and 2015 suggesting good LATERAL CONTINUITY to the higher grade zones."
Sun, 11 Apr 2021 @9:25am.
FatherTedFreckle
why keep posting if you are not invested ??
If you wish to suggest dishonesties read your own posts
you really are a prize Plum
P.S.
In my said post, I also quoted: "RACECOURSE JORC 0.44% CU & 0.064 g/t au." [cu is copper and au is gold].
NOTICE the 0.0 BEFORE THE 6? It is NOT 0.6 but 0.064 g/t.
What does this mean?
In school, 1%
0.1% is 1/10 of 1%
0.01% is ......
FatherTedFeck @22:33 Sat, 10.4.21
NOTICE THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN RFC AMBRIAN QUOTE OF CU ?
Cu is copper and the RFC Broker Study is on COPPER M & A & COPPER PROJECTS.
NOTICE MY QUOTATION VERBATIM FROM XTR: Hole 1: " 0. 3 3 % CU EQ?"
All MAJOR mining co*s and junior miners [inc exploration co*s] ALL QUOTE CU EQ verbatim.
I CANNOT CHANGE XTR*S RNS from Cu Eq to Cu and give splits to show ONLY CU COPPER.
FOR THE AVOIDANCE OF DOUBT: XTR did not quote CU ONLY. So, it is OUTSIDE MY CONTROL TO BE ABLE TO KNOW WHAT CU CONTENT IS so I quote XTR VERBATIM of CU EQ.
FSA ADVICE: DO DUE DILIGENCE. This is a mining stock. If not sure what CU and CU EQ is , ASK and find out. Anyone can ask this forum what cu is and what cu eq is? IT IS STANDARD FOR ALL OFFICIAL REPORTING RNS the SYMBOL : "CU EQ."
I trust this explains matters. Thank you.
News
I wanted to get a cup of tea and saw your post. I do not always read all the posts if there are too many as I have other things to attend to. SO IF I DO NOT REPLY, it does not mean that I have no reply.
XTR only
One as a man of the cloth and the other a Perv. That’s sums Ted up... contrarian!
only two, one for a different computer. No illusions there.