London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
You will only have one login account. Registering with multiple accounts is not allowed. Any user found to have more than one account on this site will have all, and any future accounts suspended permanently.
Your email and password must only be used by you. If a post is made under your account, it will be considered that it was posted by yourself.
Your account nickname must not be the same, or contain, listed company names or board members' names.
While debating and discussion is fine, we will not tolerate; rudeness, swearing, insulting posts, personal attacks, or posts which are invasive of another's privacy.
You will not;
discuss illegal or criminal activities.
post any confidential or price sensitive information or that is not public knowledge.
post misleading or false statements regarding the share price and performance. Such posts are deemed as market abuse, and may be reported to the appropriate authorities.
post any private communication, or part thereof, from any other person, including from a member of the board of directors of a listed company. Such posts cannot be verified as true and could be deemed to be misleading.
post any personal details (e.g. email address or phone number).
post live price or level 2 updates.
publish content that is not your original work, or infringes the copyright or other rights of any third party.
post non-constructive, meaningless, one word (or short) non-sense posts.
post links to, or otherwise publish any content containing any form of advertising, promotion for goods and services, spam, or other unsolicited communication.
post any affiliate or referral links, or post anything asking for a referral.
post or otherwise publish any content unrelated to the board or the board's topic.
re-post premium share chat posts on regular share chat.
restrict or inhibit any other user from using the boards.
impersonate any person or entity, including any of our employees or representatives.
post or transmit any content that contains software viruses, files or code designed to interrupt, destroy or limit the functionality of this website or any computer software or equipment.
If you are going to post non-English, please also post an English translation of your post.
If you are going to post non-English, please also post an English translation of your post.
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium and Verified Members
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East and have access to Premium Chat. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
The big question will be how much and is it enough to keep investors that have been primed for massive expectations. Wont be the first time it took longer than expected. Going to take quite a few drill holes and assays results before lots of big instructional investors pile in and that is what you want for big rises
In Dec 21 the company was utilising a rig capable of RC drilling but not DC. We know they swapped the old rig out for a DC rig. The reported mineralisation is at depths beyond most RC rigs' capability, so perhaps the mineralisation was simply deeper than anticipated and the original interpretation of geophysical modelling was wrong?
Indeed. Although I'd still like to know what was drilled at RS im December 21 where Twitter photo showed rig at RS drilling.
More unclear after latest RS update as currently on hole WRSDD0003. Hole WRSDD0002 was drilled prior along with WRSDD0001 - the water well. So it looks like noghing was drilled in Dec 21 or no mineralisation so chose not to report and now drilling new ore body? Just leaves a slight unknown about the whole RS where we are at
This has been a long wait, I for one have been in here for years. I do struggle with comments saying nothing has been proven so far….isn’t that why we all investing in AIM, trying to get in before everything is proven?
By all means wait until gold is confirmed in Red Setter, but please accept to pay much more. I am happy to be pretty well invested this is the most exciting period in 4/5 years will lots of previous erroneous hype.
This feels close, second rig coming next week, results will be soon and then everyone will be proven right or wrong. I for one am glad to be in and am very optimistic for the coming days/weeks. Hint of gold at Red setter this will fly.
I’d your not invested, why bother posting? If you are, surly you want this to go up so why the negativity?
Gla this the most positive period I’ve seen for wishbone…not long now
Sorry Cela but a further raise is not required, Wishbone are already very well funded. You are confusing your opinion with factual information. Please don’t. I for one would like to keep the information on this board correct so as not to intentionally mislead people.
RE: Everyone is entitled to an opinion right or wrongSun 13:40
Cela- I have not read anywhere on here by the ‘Fan boys’ of any claims of a big gold find. The only claims I have read have come from yourself, claiming there is no gold. This claim based solely on the geologists NOT using a piece of equipment that has been explained would NOT be used by geologists as it’s inaccurate. About as inaccurate as your posts by the looks of things.
Everyone is entitled to an opinion right or wrongSun 12:52
You fan boys will not accept anything other than wishbone is wonderful and they have discovered a big gold find which isn’t fair to new investors comeing in but let’s see which way it goes I hope everyone makes money but with caution attached to it as for my history purchased Xtract resources when it was a penny and sold 4 million when it hit 9 pence so I have had plenty of success to your dissatisfaction
Cela, you are simply wrong. Your inability to comprehend the key points from a handful of simple sentences is astounding. It seems you are saying, in your infinite wisdom, that you know better than the manufacturers of XRF technology. The paragraph I posted before was a direct quote from one of the main manufacturers in this space. Indeed, contrary to your suggestion, it would be highly misleading to mention XRF readings in relation to gold readings in an RNS due to the risk of a false positive. As the last paragraph I provided was clearly too taxing you to understand, I will repeat a couple of key points on XRF for you (quoted directly from an XRF equipment manufacturer, my emphasis added in CAPS):
1) "handheld XRF analyzers DO NOT support direct low level measurement of Au in geological samples" 2) "interference from other elements (e.g., As, Zn, W, and Se) CAN YIELD A FALSE POSITIVE Au determination"
Everyone understands this is an exploration play with risk attached. My complaint with you is your repeated cross ramping of stocks (which subsequently perform very poorly) and your demonstrably false claims about issues relating to this stock. The problem is your commentary may sound credible to unsophisticated investors and cause them to make misinformed investment decisions - like I said before, worse than useless.
You know only too well XRF can clearly give an indication if gold is present so geologists buy them just to play games with them then ,your walking round blind with no cane And people should be made aware before putting money in here that no discovery has yet been found and I stand by what I say Artemis has the most amazeing core samples that compared to GGP ,s but amounted to no gold present so all I’m saying to new people comeing in is to air on the side of caution here and a fund raising is guaranteed also
Ignore Cela’s misleading and erroneous posts, instead focus on facts. Cela is confused and his nonsense posting might cause people to believe him and make poor decisions. Per a manufacturer of XRF tech:
“ It is common knowledge that handheld XRF analyzers do not support direct low level measurement of Au in geological samples (e.g., low ppm and ppb). The lab-based fire assay technique is commonly recognized as the method of choice for Au analysis. Au L-level X-ray lines are located in a very crowded area of the X-ray fluorescence energy spectrum. In this part of the spectrum, interference from other elements (e.g., As, Zn, W, and Se) can yield a false-positive Au determination.”
It’s quite simpe to detect any signs of Gold or other precious metals in core samples now as geologist use XRF detection But no mention of gold present and another Drill rig on route It’s odd on there is a fund raise comeing And I guess if poulden had said no indication of Gold the price would tank ? Which is why visual mineralisation was only mentioned To dangle that carrot to the market ,but really does not indicate any gold discovery at all .
I see Cela is back with spurious posts in an apparent further attempt to deramp this stock. I shall adopt my previously proven strategy of viewing this as the perfect contra indicator and I shall buy more WSBN on Monday.
Remind us Cela, as you are in the business of making predictions on this board, how much has WSBN *risen* since you told us you were selling your holding here and slated Poulden (I'll remind you, it's risen > +50% since you sold and posted about it). As a comparison, how much have those other shares *fallen* which you shamelessly cross ramped on this board - it's mixed, but it seems that pretty much all have fallen and some have been complete disasters like EVR which has been suspended for months and lost its BoD.
UKtrader - you can align yourself to the likes of Cela if you choose, but check out Cela's posting history. He has done precisely what you have accused 1DAYMAYBE of doing, ramping stocks across this forum but with a pattern of aggressive posting history against anyone who disagrees with his views. Unlike 1DAYMAYBE, who has been consistent in his conviction here and added some useful observations to the board, Cela hops between stocks posting his bullish proclamations along with superficial and poorly considered commentary. Fortunately for us, we can see he is a false prophet through a quick scan of his posting history - virtually all of his stock selections have performed like dogs.
Should have confirmation by Weds of the second drill up and running at red setter.
I am pleased that our Australian management team have managed to secure a second rig for Red Setter for next week. DDH1 Drilling know the ground conditions well in the Patersons following extensive experience at Havieron, from the early days. The exciting times at Wishbone continue."
RE: Visual mineralisation but no indication of goldSat 09:32
Far better to sit tight and wait for several drill holes and assay results before throwing kitchen sink at it Cela24 You may find yourself with a few new friends on your tail for urging a bit of caution lol