Stefan Bernstein explains how the EU/Greenland critical raw materials partnership benefits GreenRoc. Watch the full video here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
Anyway, to answer Dreamingof's question. An reasonable expectation that shows recovery would be in excess 250t combined. That would be approx One third of what good looks like and would still leave a huge void between reality and the companies expectation
Who built the dams? Was it a separate company or were guys taken from the production line?
I'm at 110. Which is WOEFULLY INADEQUATE. GIT has a 100% spread, he's not being committed
As Q1 was 92.4 tons combined I think Git in referring to greater than Q4 is a reasonable statement , putting 120 tons as a minimum is also a reasonable assumption,( yes that is a little below the 1q4 133t) . Had he been referring to Qi I think he would have said 90 t.
I think you are starting the game way too early. Its another month before you have answers FWIW
Q1 production was:
· Total tungsten and tin concentrate production of 92.4t
· Tungsten ("WO3") concentrate production of 63.5t
· Tin ("Sn") concentrate production of 28.9 dry metric tonnes ("dmt")
So anything more than that is an improvement, given the figures in the April update from the La Parrilla Production Summary. The April update treferred to 3 shipments of tungsten and one of tin, so that’s approx 60 tons and 20 tons in one month, so that alone almost equals q1, but shipments may not necessarily be production.
I would like to see 150 tons a month, but for this quarter only using the lower grade ore can’t see how they could. In all I think 120 tons combined is not an unreasonable expectation for this quarter, it’s next quarter that we should see the step up increases all imho.
Doh. Getinthere " I am expecting more than Q4 2020, so my guess is somewhere between 120 tons of combined production as a minimum and as much as 240 combined tons as a maximum."
Combined for Q4 was 133t. so to say a minimum of 120t is less than Q4.
Did you mean to say more than 21 Q1 ?
Dreamy
We’ve been on a 5 day week and processing only low to medium grade so I’m not expecting too much, however I am expecting more than Q4 2020, so my guess is somewhere between 120 tons of combined production as a minimum and as much as 240 combined tons as a maximum.
What do people think would be production numbers which would satisfy them that we are really on the road to recovery and meeting our expectations for this quarter (this is different from the guessing game)