London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
Kev
3 green boxes got deleted as well as your post, obviously I don’t know what was in them, but if they were on the same thread and contained, as they often do, nastiness and or misinformation, its possible that someone reported one of those and yours got removed as part of the thread.
Some of these posters are really tedious as well as nasty, but often perfectly reasonable posts get removed as well.
K3VMC
I have asked admin to remove my post of last night. I did so before 7am this morning, when I posted the corrected version.
That is all I know
Well, well, well! Looks like somebody had my previous reply removed, so here it comes again. Can anybody think of anything wrong with it? Did it just offend someone’s ego? Or their agenda?
GUG
“ Instantexpert - Your statement about a 20% reduction in Sn is incorrect but to the others who dismiss the smelt figure, I'm sorry but you are wrong. It is a "processing charge".
Ok, so wres produces the tin concentrate, then sells it. That’s it. End of story. Concentrate on lorry, out of gate, wres gets paid. Wres has NOTHING to do with the concentrate post sale. It is simply silly to suggest otherwise. No wait! You show us anything in the Shard report to that effect and I will apologise to you. I think you just make these things up.
“So, once you get to 100t a month of combined production. Working 24/7 on the higher grades and with less time between shifts, how do you then ramp up to the stated 257t/month (combined) target production from LP alone. Geng would call it a "gap".
You improve the processing circuit and process more rom. I don’t know if that will do the full amount, but I really could not care less. Profitable and cash flow positive are my two objectives, followed by refinancing.
Shard report states that at production of 1181t pa (100t a month) combined concentrate production the OPEX is $248 per mtu. The current revenue at the higher selling prices are $156 for W and $180 for Sn (I've not included the smelt charge to avoid further haggling). So based on these numbers and the achievement of production targets It is still making a considerable nett operating loss. It is spending money faster than it is earning it.”
No it doesn’t. You misrepresented these figures already this week, but I let it go. I don’t like interacting with you, but since you repeat them, I feel obliged to correct you. Look at page six of the Shard report.
1181 is NOT the production figure, 1,181kt is the ROM. Production for 2021 is there at 682 dry metric tonnes of WO3, which looks like being surpassed, based on current reports. This translates into 44,759 of tungsten. Using a total open of $11.2m, opex/mtu tungsten is $248, but you failed to account for the tin credits, which gives a net opex/mtu of $199.
To summarise, you have invented a smelting cost, confused 1.18million tonnes of ROM with tungsten production and overrated the opex/mtu by 25%. If you cannot read and understand such a basic table of data, why are you constantly talking down to investors who actually know their stuff and can do the complicated stuff, like read and do sums?
I'm sure WRES will produce revenues of $1.5m/month, it would not be unreasonable to assume that. At current pricing it would require <100t concentrate shipped to do so.
Troajan maintains "if its produced,it gets shippped" Yet the company RNS's say different. It ships when they have 20t shipments of each material.
K3VMC - The 3 day comment was a slip. It meant to say 7 day and you are correct in your comment about an assumption of production, yet Troajan is banding it about like its already happened.
Instantexpert - Your statement about a 20% reduction in Sn is incorrect but to the others who dismiss the smelt figure, I'm sorry but you are wrong. It is a "processing charge" Maybe ask the CFO to explain it
So, once you get to 100t a month of combined production. Working 24/7 on the higher grades and with less time between shifts, how do you then ramp up to the stated 257t/month (combined) target production from LP alone. Geng would call it a "gap" That is more then just some fine tweaking. Yes process more ROM but that alone will still leave a significant shortfall based on the Q2 ratio. The Q3 report will give a more indicative ratio when it arrives.
Shard report states that at production of 910t combined concentrate production the OPEX is $199 per mtu.(allowing for a tin credit) I believe this would be further reduced by the current tin price, however the current revenue at the higher selling prices are $156 for W and $180 for Sn (I've not included the smelt charge to avoid further haggling). So based on these numbers and the achievement of production targets It is still making a considerable nett operating loss. It is spending money faster than it is earning it.