London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
You will only have one login account. Registering with multiple accounts is not allowed. Any user found to have more than one account on this site will have all, and any future accounts suspended permanently.
Your email and password must only be used by you. If a post is made under your account, it will be considered that it was posted by yourself.
Your account nickname must not be the same, or contain, listed company names or board members' names.
While debating and discussion is fine, we will not tolerate; rudeness, swearing, insulting posts, personal attacks, or posts which are invasive of another's privacy.
You will not;
discuss illegal or criminal activities.
post any confidential or price sensitive information or that is not public knowledge.
post misleading or false statements regarding the share price and performance. Such posts are deemed as market abuse, and may be reported to the appropriate authorities.
post any private communication, or part thereof, from any other person, including from a member of the board of directors of a listed company. Such posts cannot be verified as true and could be deemed to be misleading.
post any personal details (e.g. email address or phone number).
post live price or level 2 updates.
publish content that is not your original work, or infringes the copyright or other rights of any third party.
post non-constructive, meaningless, one word (or short) non-sense posts.
post links to, or otherwise publish any content containing any form of advertising, promotion for goods and services, spam, or other unsolicited communication.
post any affiliate or referral links, or post anything asking for a referral.
post or otherwise publish any content unrelated to the board or the board's topic.
re-post premium share chat posts on regular share chat.
restrict or inhibit any other user from using the boards.
impersonate any person or entity, including any of our employees or representatives.
post or transmit any content that contains software viruses, files or code designed to interrupt, destroy or limit the functionality of this website or any computer software or equipment.
If you are going to post non-English, please also post an English translation of your post.
If you are going to post non-English, please also post an English translation of your post.
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium and Verified Members
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East and have access to Premium Chat. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
“ Is Velo still around ir has he taken your approach ? “ -----------------------
Trying to reduce my contributions to these forums, as can be addictive these ‘blogs’ as a mate of mine refers to them.
I am around insomuch as WBI is on a watchlist, and I will skim-read the forum to see if anything new sends me off down a new track. I’ve nothing against posting the odd comment; I’m just trying not to : ) I’d like to see how this all develops. Might/might not become a holder, depending on a number of developments/issues.
Had to turn this desktop computer on to check this LSE site, as on my phone many posts now appear to be missing. But it’s the same here.
A new poster turned up today called ‘BaldSmith’. It was his 1st ever post today, and clicking on his history – it appeared he’d just joined this site, this week. Nonetheless, he weighed in on the ongoing argumentative debate, citing his new ID to get around posting as his prior ID’s.
Bit of a naïve mistake to boast of operating under multiple ID personalities and expect LSE to remain unmoved. They’re lethal on live multiple ID’s and ban for life as it attacks the integrity of their business. So, I came back to re-read that post.
And not only has that post been deleted but so has all of BC100’s and Greyfriars too. They must have the same IP address that is visible to LSE.
Never witnessed a multiple ID poster openly boast of operating as such. So, wanted to see if he mentioned his fake ID’s by name, as don’t recall him mentioning them individually. Just that he was forced to start afresh as ”BaldSmith”.
Still keep thinking I’m confusing with another forum page, but no, all BC100’s posts and all Greyfriar’s posts have been wiped 100% from this site as if they never existed! Or is it some gremlin in my computer?
Any other Posters comments completely missing, or is it just those two?
I cannot remember what Bunter asked about in his now filtered message. I think it was how is Mike an expert in carbon credits?
How many timber companies are there? 100 or a 1000? i.e. almost SFA! Of that SFA number how many know about forward carbon credits?
Mike realised that none were taking advantage of forward carbon credits which might make him unique! Paul looked at it previously an rejected it because it was not viable on price! How many others did the same!
Whether he has a Ph.D or is a Professor is immaterial! I have a cousin with both and he won a Marie Curie award. Mike has a and honours and a Masters degree in Mathematics and Statistics and several years of work experience instead of Ph.D which is extremely valuable!
My cousin became a Professor after the Govt upset him over funding for his department despite his award. His years in Hammersmith gained him a Professorship in the States where he has been for years!
I reckon we are in good hands! 4 filtered now! I hope he is apologising for being a plonker but I'll never know!
Jay, and others, the absence of an RNS for the buyer of those 30M shares made me return to the TR-1 for the seller!
And then I saw the answer! I never looked at the sell price! It was 6.5p so it was reported as a buy when in fact it was a sell! Paying a premium for large buys is to be expected but I don't think getting a premium price for a sell is usual?
My suspicion is that the 30M buy took a week or two to fill and the average over than peiod was 6.5p
The final tranche was probably withing the spred at that time but the weighted average was way above the spread so looked like a buy!!!
A weighted average is a way to get a more realistic average.
e.g. 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 6 6 looks like an average of 3.5 (1+6)/2 the weighted average uses the sum of 4x1 + 3x3 + 15x4 +2x5 + 2x6 = 95 divided by the number of items =4+3+15+2+2 or 26 i.e. 95/26 which is 3.65384615385 I expected it to come out nearer 4 :O)
He is not BC100 of course ...... he is 99% sure to be mrmoagi! Filtered! He followed me from ADVFN (where he is Donkey40) to LSE as mrmoagi/oldbaillie with the advent of VPN I reckon! He was repeatedly kicked out of LSE before VPN as TheKenner and Kenmore and many others no doubt! Plonker then, plonker now!
moagi is always wrong - getting a tick from him is the kiss of death!
Michael Floyd Head Asia Ex -Convertibles/ Prop TradingHead Asia Ex -Convertibles/ Prop Trading Nomura 2007 - 2014 · 7 yrs 1 mo2007 - 2014 · 7 yrs 1 mo Hong Kong Portfolio Manager for Nomura’s internal propriety group, Relative Value Trading.
Nomura 1.4 trillion JPY , a mere £8bn !!!!
For someone who ticks up BC100 posts or even worse , you are BC100, you are not fit to question anybody connected with Woodbois!
I have a lot of respect for you, and to the consternation of everyone else, I am prepared to clarify what is going on here. I suspect everybody is as sick of me fighting mrmoagi on TLOU, and the two on here, as I am! But I cannot tolerate liars who are talking tripe.
All I can do is take what you agree with from BC and explain how I see that situation! Unfortunately, showing the three of you what I consider to be the facts falls on stoney ground!
Going full circle, I have to return to the expression "meaningful profits".
There are two options, both of which Woodbois are taking advantage of IF I AM RIGHT.
The three musketeers believe Woodbois have adopted the first one, timber, but will only move onto the other, carbon credits, in 7 or 8 or 9 years time.
That belief applies to the "meaningful profits" statement imho! 470k hectares of forest will qualify for credits and actual credits will be forthcoming then. So we agree on that? Yes?
BUT what you are missing is that this company is doomed to MEDIOCRISY if you are right! It will be in the same state as it has been for 20 years, struggling to make profits but adding the cost of the carbon credits team to the cost!! I don't suppose Michael Floyd comes cheap in today's market! He is one of few qualified experts.
Where do we differ?
Forward carbon credits! We plan to manage new plots that have been bought by conglomerates spending possibly £100M on those plots! Once it is possible, i.e. reforestration of those barren plots is underway by our expert management, we will issue FORWARD CREDIT CERTIFICATES which guarantee carbon credits in the FUTURE!!!
The conglomerates can sell their FORWARD CREDITS and we will take our cut of those credits! Those cuts will FUND OUR PROJECT until meaningful profits come flooding in after 5 or more years! At that points the certificates are redundant and all parties will receive true credits worth the prevailing price which is going to massive by then! The price will increase steadily throughout the whole period so every increasing funding of the project will benefit expansion into Mozambique and other countries.
I am going to try and take a step back at this point. I am not reading moagi who has calmed down on his criticism of the TLOU board.
BC is a different beast - he makes moagi look intelligent!