Gordon Stein, CFO of CleanTech Lithium, explains why CTL acquired the 23 Laguna Verde licenses. Watch the video here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
God are these guys still at it. Strong buy still.
100% pm if he really wanted to make the changes he spouts he would buy some shares so he could actually vote, instead he sits on the side lines like a fat football supporter screaming what the player should be doing. Put up or shut up Pigman
Agree time to move on from BOD changes.
Pointless addressing Pork's concern as each time you do he comes up with something different. He is not invested.
Focus for BOD should now be getting positive news out and improving the SP rather than wasting time arguing with shareholders.
Id say, now everyone has what they want to a degree, how about focusing on future rather than continue to kick someone who is obviously down at present? Not that I blame her for exiting X as it has gotten far worse under Musk (imo) and also left a couple months ago...
Onwards and upwards now - hopefully!
What scientists ? will there be left... ?
obviously it is ALL about the money (yes Im in for a profit), and not about the science?
Who wouldnt want a cure/suppressant to Cancers?
IMO
@Andysel
Thanks - OK lets see how events unfold and what the BOD looks like going onto H2
I hear you regarding voting on new BOD additions at the AGM and that part is fair enough but, i think most of the frustration here is that for this stock to ever have any chance of recovery the current BOD MUST be removed, ie Suzy, Kevin, Martin and Gerry MUST all go and it doesn't feel like that will be a reality as it stands.
By withdrawing the Requisition Notice it has enabled two of them straight away namely Kevin and Martin to avoid being voted to be removed. I'm also not convinced how "active" Suzy will be in looking for a replacement CEO for her but lets see.
@Porky
shareholders have made it clear we do not want Suzy on the BOD, and this compromise has been made to ensure a smoother transition as possible, however if it becomes obvious they start to pee us around we will take action with her immediate removal through a req and then just have to ride the turbulence out
Its also worth noting that come June at the GM all shareholders will have the opportunity to vote on any new members/positions that are appointed to the BOD.
Who the f*** knows PM. Very strange way to live life but there you go
If you really believe that then I wonder why you are here 24/7 without any investment for 3 years.
Only true thing @PM2022 you have posted .”401 and 201 have already been given away” too true they have, one to a potless start up that has failed to deliver at every turn and one to a potless phoenix business trying to raise cash to keep itself going.
Some of her commercial decisions have been absolutely shocking that’s why @ValJu you need a CEO with strong business commercial acumen to drive this, leave scientists to do science work.
Don’t mix chickens with foxes
401 and 201 have already been given away and the deals should be completed soon.
Total BOD members will likely be the same apart from the observer. The suggested by Suzy were not confirmed so it is possible that one of those two will become the CEO or someone else might step down.
my only concern, is suzy was the last of the original scientists left?
dont you need a degree of knowledge of 201 / 301 / 401 etc?
or are we just going for a "bull****bafflesbrains" ceo who will do, as he/she is told, too the heavyweight holders? just so they can get a big return... ?
yes suzy was in-experienced ceo, but surely there must be a position, ie chief science officer? until the original products are concluded one way or the other?
personally i would have a: never engaged certain personnel and b: would remove them before a senior science person? imo
@TDK
She is not going anywhere just a rebadge and continue on the BOD as before. And following yesterday’s RNS neither is Kevin, Martin and Gerry. They will continue to milk this cow for all it’s worth until death spiral finance is introduced through to lights out.
All that has been achieved is four more NEDs have been introduced, two from Suzy and two from the Requisition notice issuers team. Four more mouths to feed to help burn through the remaining cash runway quicker.
Totally Pointless chain of events as it stands
Seems like a great opportunity for a strong driven individual to come in and turn this around,I would image knowing how stubborn Suzy is that she will be keen to not leave before announcing some good news.
Small steps in the right direction
More chances you will win in lottery than investing all those tiny tinny little companies.
all these years what i have achieved from aim companies just gambling .
they are all tiny ****ty companies run by idiots who might have called them the ceo of f all .
once i am out from val as well won’t bother when looking any aim companies unless there is solid sales comes trough the doors.
Oh my, finally we get her out-ish. But yeah wage bill increased further with the new recruits is an ouch. Love the way they say need someone to steer the ship who knows how to handle large companies, wouldnt call vali large, size is in the eye of the bwholder i guess. Be interesting now where this goes considering todays flatlined on the news. Can only go up right? Right?!
Does this mean anything? What would they mean by group in this context? Maybe she will head Inophea labs or a potential takeover of Valirx who knows.
within the Company or Group.
Decent RNS that was for a change. Very well written. Onwards and upwards. Let's hope the newbies don't find out that Trx was a load of old cobblers, or her new role could be tea lady.
There has obviously been some negotiation following the SH requisition submission and all parties have agreed on what has been disclosed today; However, I suspect Cox will be out shortly after a new CEO is announced.
He'll probably join the BOD of a charity organisation given how VAL has been operating under his tenure ;-)
@Badsterman
We have historically not always agreed on matters with this stock but frankly you have hit the nail firmly on the head. You are 100% right. I totally agree with you.
They would know more than you do of what has gone on behind the scenes. Best let it be or sell out.
My guess is Cox is needed to finalise the 201 deal and help with the lab as it would be very difficult for a new person if we lose all the work that is in progress and if he goes and Suzy goes then it is total chaos.
We have a shareholder on the board that was backed by a group and a new CEO. You cannot have it all.
Muted indeed,
The resolution has been withdrawn so Lampshire, Desler and Cox remain in place, to continue their litany of failure, having used Suzy as their scapegoat!
Who agreed to withdraw the resolution and on what terms? I'd still like the opportunity to vote Cox and Lampshire out.
Why no Benjamin Snipe and his valuable patent expertise?
The stark reality is we've upset our best scientist and got ourselves a bigger wage bill.
What a mess.
Porky, will you be adding more shares or selling?
Anyone else surprised at the muted response by the s/p to the news? seems to suggest that "the market" is very unsure as to the future direction of travel.