London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
You will only have one login account. Registering with multiple accounts is not allowed. Any user found to have more than one account on this site will have all, and any future accounts suspended permanently.
Your email and password must only be used by you. If a post is made under your account, it will be considered that it was posted by yourself.
Your account nickname must not be the same, or contain, listed company names or board members' names.
While debating and discussion is fine, we will not tolerate; rudeness, swearing, insulting posts, personal attacks, or posts which are invasive of another's privacy.
You will not;
discuss illegal or criminal activities.
post any confidential or price sensitive information or that is not public knowledge.
post misleading or false statements regarding the share price and performance. Such posts are deemed as market abuse, and may be reported to the appropriate authorities.
post any private communication, or part thereof, from any other person, including from a member of the board of directors of a listed company. Such posts cannot be verified as true and could be deemed to be misleading.
post any personal details (e.g. email address or phone number).
post live price or level 2 updates.
publish content that is not your original work, or infringes the copyright or other rights of any third party.
post non-constructive, meaningless, one word (or short) non-sense posts.
post links to, or otherwise publish any content containing any form of advertising, promotion for goods and services, spam, or other unsolicited communication.
post any affiliate or referral links, or post anything asking for a referral.
post or otherwise publish any content unrelated to the board or the board's topic.
re-post premium share chat posts on regular share chat.
restrict or inhibit any other user from using the boards.
impersonate any person or entity, including any of our employees or representatives.
post or transmit any content that contains software viruses, files or code designed to interrupt, destroy or limit the functionality of this website or any computer software or equipment.
If you are going to post non-English, please also post an English translation of your post.
If you are going to post non-English, please also post an English translation of your post.
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium and Verified Members
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East and have access to Premium Chat. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
The company has been working with PYC for about 15 years. Very capable bunch. However, the data always needs to go through committee including the company, as a sponsor, with a leading, nominated person, well qualified medical third party monitor person, resgulator, hospital etichs committee, principal investigator etc. When you have done all that then you have a chance of being on the top of the data, which is generated during several years. On the whole, the committee has a conf call about once a week a so, and they tend to question (person) involved in clinical trials very hard.
It's only because we keep getting told how very clever the previous lot were, enduring a sustained slew of academic snobbery around scientific prowess. Yet I've asked a number scientific questions now, and been referred to previous team members and RNSs.
It's strange, because apparently all expertise has now been lost. Yet when I've asked Suzy similar questions, she's invariably able to engage around the subject matter, and is only too pleased to answer very detailed queries, is on top of all the data, and appears to have very savvy financial acumen and executive thinking.
So it's fine to blow hard, but pick a valid reason to challenge the new BOD, and don't dish it out if you can't take it, in full knowledge that the new BOD are not in a position to be able to come on here and defend themselves.
Did you see rhubarbmk2 post? Can you answer these two questions. I also would love to hear what you think. Many thanks.
RE: RE RE: Update due soonWed 11:44 Satu - genuine post here; very interested in your take. Please do answer, and be as technical as possible.
As you are concerned that any expertise/qualifications have now been lost at VAL, how might you have managed the limited and "patchy" readout for the VAL201 Phase 1/2b, beyond some additional simulation work with PYC (ongoing)?
We have to assume that the kitty is relatively empty, leaving no option no run a further trial, in-house. What was your interpretation of the data, and what would have been your next steps, which you feel would be different to the current operation?
The work of 201 was conducted by late chairman Oliver, George and Victoria (now elsewhere since about a year) together with UCLH under MHRA. The data, which was gathered before C19 outbrake is of course still there with UCLH and available. Most of it was RNSd well back then. And also summarised as update.
I don’t know who you refer as G&M. But perhaps you should realise that ValiRx supported Suzy, Valiseek and 401 project several years. Financially, scientifically and psychologically in a great way. So perhaps you should think before making such comments.
I know a few red brick university professors who informally always make spelling and grammar mistakes but otherwise can write well. It is rather ignorant to think they would all type perfectly in such a situation.
Hopefully we can rise beyond 24p then the next rise will be 30/35p but news can smash that resistance at any time.
Oh give it a rest colbalt. IF you had EVER communicated with George in the past via email/text etc you WOULD 100% know it is him. Many many of us have communicated with him, especially in 'email gate' and it is EXACT the same, now run along and stop trying to preach to those that know the truth.
SatuV, With the expense of PIs. What a wonderful(!!) business acumen your friend has. He recruited 12patients in 6 years. Just started a trial and then conned all the innocent PIs in the name of clinical trials. Please look at similar companies.
RB, I know it's a bit off topic but I just googled Colonel Rosa Klebb and I got the very reassuring initial statement that they are a fictional character. Following the link to Wikipedia there is a good little article that explains that the name is actually a clever little pun. This is turning into an educational lunch break for me :)
Having spoken extensively to George in the past, I can say he comes across as an eccentric intellectual who I was quite fond of. On the topic of literacy though, he does have a habit (I admit I have this also) of writing texts/emails on the move, occasionally I would get the most bizarre emails in a 'stream of conciousness' style writing (i.e. no punctuation and structure/meaning is completely out of the window).
Some people are missing the point (deliberately or inadvertently). If Dr George Morris is his 60's, he probably went to a private school or a grammar school. He would have been taught the basics of English and how to construct a sentence. He then (probably) took his A levels and went to University and obtained his first degree. At some stage he obtained his masters then his PhD. His acumen as a business man has nothing to do with the fact that he is clearly an educated man. The person known as Valtree is obviously not in that league and it is a sad reflection on the education system, that Valtree has fooled so many people, many of whom can't spell or construct a meaningful post anyway!!
Colonel Rosa Klebb, will now be stamping her feet thumbing through her notes.
L"'s just turned to 5 v 1 & 25k v 5k so the next move ups coming very soon. G&M for whatever reason have again failed to even suppress the SP. Roll on Suzy & Co shafting the pair of them as they would do to them.
Have you noticed its like clockwork here with SatuV and Valtree. When we appear to be rising again SatuV pops up to remind us of the amount of work they have done and how we wouldn't get to this stage without the expertise etc and when we drop, Valtree appears destroying the BoD. Like old times. Miss you both like a hole in the head.
Satu - genuine post here; very interested in your take. Please do answer, and be as technical as possible.
As you are concerned that any expertise/qualifications have now been lost at VAL, how might you have managed the limited and "patchy" readout for the VAL201 Phase 1/2b, beyond some additional simulation work with PYC (ongoing)? We have to assume that the kitty is relatively empty, leaving no option no run a further trial, in-house. What was your interpretation of the data, and what would have been your next steps, which you feel would be different to the current operation?