We would love to hear your thoughts about our site and services, please take our survey here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
It is not going to happen, if you had to bring every scoundrel on AIM to Court, you would be stuffed at the first hurdle. It is a mugs game. You were warned. Look at Heid and family, oh yes, Penny Shares let's ramp them up the @@@e all your waking day, doesn't work like that. What you do have is a sad person with hardly a pound to put in the meter. Sad, very very sad.Worse, gloating about the misfortune of others. So nasty, I sometimes wonder if she really exists
Yes, too complicated for me.
That's why I think UJO should communicate with shareholders about the issue, saves any confusion.
Do you not agree?
VHB
"You don't seem to think things through to a logical conclusion."
"I didn't say he had a logical conclusion. I said 'what is the most obvious conclusion'."
"Bearing this in mind, what is the most obvious conclusion? It was a placee or potential placee."
"The fact is I believe it was clearly nothing to do with Union Jack Oil"
"Perhaps the investigation is ongoing, or perhaps those involved closed ranks to protect their interests and it is stuck. I've no idea."
Where do we start with that bag of horse poo.
I know. You have no idea :)
DB who runs the #ujo twitter account must of banned the majority of poster on here.
Crazy for the Chairman of a PLC company to do that.
Is it because he feel insecure?
VHB, why would DB go full on investigation? The damage was done. There is still a scoundrel in the midst. That's not unusual. Still leaves a bad taste though. Probably why they are so sensitive on the UJO website. I think the only person who hasn't had an outright ban is Heid and The Roofer. ha ha
I like that Brother. If it were positive then we would be first to know. We are already on the second iteration. CPR plus. They had better shift it because the oil price is not in their favour. I am out at the moment. You can't spend 13 years at it with absolutely no shareholder value. Doubtful I will get back in even if it goes to 17. It is an AIM only way to go is trade when you can. Sentiment is no good, doesn't bring home the bacon..
Miraso could be ,l or Cloves has returned
well if you dont own any I can understand that
VHB sounds a lot like ocelot to me
never a breath of criticism of the BoD or their actions (or lack of same in this case)
Very measured "tone"
Cut and paste merchant as well
VHB , you are on planet cuckoo land , nothing more , maybe you try being a shareholder like me , more FACTS , sorry you don't like Facts , only make believe in the land of lilyput
so its not a fact , just a belief , nothing more then? so you seem to change your views very quickly on what you have posted . Fact the subject was brought up by DB in his interview 15th Nov 21, and he was going to investigate it , or do you dispute that FACT too?
You don't seem to think things through to a logical conclusion. hate copying and pasting , your post , short memory VHB
I think Winifroth makes it up as he goes along, a bit like a poor man's Daily Mail. Like a bully, he sees a chink in the armour and goes with it. Who listens to Broker's Reports and takes them seriously? Like them, he is sort of interesting but mostly a bit of a joke. A chancer and on subject ,this Research Tree isn't much cop either. Have a lovely weekend all
If he has a logical conclusion as you state , why hasn't DB put a close to it , maybe you need to listen to his interview again 15 Nov 21, over 8 months ago
or maybe not ,
Meanwhile back at the office they’re debating whether to release the GCBH report to anxious shareholders.
Question is, where did TW get his information?
VHB , just like Heid , a copy and paste merchant , nothing more
Yes VHB, the third I believe?
So where did TW get the info from? does he work for UJO? nope , sp who gave him that? VHB . , placings go through brokers - quote Securities are offered to the sponsors or brokers private clients and/or a narrow group of investors., does that answer your question? so please dont treat me as a fool , and post lies
Whichever way you look at it there has been 4 leaked placings and shareholders are still being treated like mushrooms.
Not so much as a 'documents have been lodged with the appropriate regulatory department.' Blah, blah, blah.
Posters on here will state that this has 'probably' been done and UJO are not permitted to divulge this information to shareholders.
Personally I suspect nothing has been done as the investigation found nothing as David failed to look in the appropriate areas.
Maybe the investigation was a good guise to snoop on certain posters who frequent this bulletin board? Imo.
To keep it simple DB
4/5 firm employees at the time
PR , 1
Broker 1
Well that narrowed it down for you , or is it too close to home ??? Clarify and it will be history