Gordon Stein, CFO of CleanTech Lithium, explains why CTL acquired the 23 Laguna Verde licenses. Watch the video here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
Agreed Chrish, saw this link shared on another copper-company board. Great rule of thumb for indication of high-grade copper resource, for anything shallower than 300m and viable for open-pit mining processing = drill intercept of 100m x 1% cu.
Here we have 73m beginning almost at the surface, just for starters, with much more to come. Also, importantly, potentially much lower cost ISR processing than even open pit likely means that that rule of thumb can be even narrower, let alone environmental impact... I'm looking forward to assays to come and the boost to that resource inference!
https://www.mining.com/web/making-the-grade-understanding-exploration-results/
PS I took a small stake here after coming across THR through the POW deal (I'm a holder there). I like this company's ethos (think the Gov partnership and obviously Kapunda is a fascinating proposition) and think the prospects are good, both short and longer term.
Adpowers & Charlie - all good points. I just hope the spike in demand is all legit. I'd hate for this stuff to get in the wrong hands....
I am new to this company so forgive me while I dig around but £17m it looks cheap here, really cheap.
Some have cashed in their chips waaaaay tooo early and are going to have to watch it climb without them. Multiple projects. Results at Alford East are worthy of much more. 73m at 1% cu from 6m. THR can build on those results with assays to come. Kapunda Drilling. ASX pushed this to 1.10 over night and no doubt they will continue buying up the weakness and push it higher. Uranium companies have been rocketing across the planet and copper and...well you get the idea.
This is the company you want to be holding.
I am new to this company but £17m so forgive me while I dig around but it looks cheap here, really cheap.
Some have cashed in their chips waaaaay tooo early and are going to have to watch it climb without them. Multiple projects. Results at Alford East are worthy of much more. 73m at 1% cu from 6m. THR can build on those results with assays to come. Kapunda Drilling. ASX pushed this to 1.10 over night and no doubt they will continue buying up the weakness and push it higher. Uranium companies have been rocketing across the planet and copper and...well you get the idea.
This is the company you want to be holding.
Why is it worrying? Nuclear energy is the purest form of energy that exists? 2 million times more energy dense than breaking chemical bonds (ie combustion), the whole universe runs off nuclear energy, the sun, the centre of the earth, nature has a habit of finding a local minima on the energy landscape. Everyone refers to Chernobyl, without appreciating that it failed because of 1) political reasons, and 2) extremely poor reactor design, flaws based on physics. Modern reactors simply couldn't fail in the same way, ie, modern reactor design doesn't have a positive void coefficient, amongst other things. For people worried about waste, well they should consider that more isotopes are emitted into the atmosphere from burning coal than anything else. For economies that want to secure baseload power, nuclear guarantees that. There is a correlation with societal advancement and access to reliable and cheap power, which nuclear power offers. If you look at the life-cycle of solar and wind, they are hardly as clean as is purported.
Prophet - Can you hear the BSG sing............. I can't hear an F ing thing - Ha Ha Ha
Good news from THR with lots of fingers in lots of pies with assets all doing well (Uranium, Gold etc.....)
GLA
Rajbury, I don't think its worrying, its a squeeze. Sprott are buying up uranium in the market and have squeezed the price. People think its a bull run, I guess enjoy it while it lasts. The trend is your friend and all that.
Bit worrying, all this interest in uranium (50% up in last month)....
Good for uranium stocks, though.
If it gets noticed for its uranium, it'll go vertical the way Aura did (and GCL and Yellowcake and every US uranium stock out there).
Actually 10x the market cap, minimum.
The market has not priced in the potential here, in 2021 ongoing exploration in 5 separate projects for gold, copper, uranium/vanadium, tungsten. Any one of these can justify the market cap alone.
Video: https://vimeo.com/607174668
...that'll be Ruth from the Ozarks then ? :)
If it helps.... investing.com have a similar thing. Top gainers/top losers..... also being a live feed, much more precise. I think I'm correct in saying that the LSE one is delayed by 15 to 20 mins unless on premium it's different.
Also VAL (up 6.25%) not showing. There are probably others, too.
What with last week's problems with RNSs and director purchases info, LSE is getting rather unreliable.
Risers' board17 Sep 2021 08:51
Why has LSE removed THR from this morning's leader board?
BSG4 complainted !
It's shockingly low
Absolutely, Charlie.....many investors & traders (myself included) will refer to the Riser board when considering stocks to buy or sell. It gives a stock visibility at a crucial juncture.
I guarantee any glitch LSE seems to have that it always affects me negatively. I bet if THR was 20% down it wouldn’t have glitched and appeared at the top of the fallers board!
Rajbury, its a data feed issue, I have had to email the LSE email a few times about another stock. I think its info@lse.co.uk. They have IT glitches a lot at the moment, but I have previously pointed out its potentially material to investors.
Why has LSE removed THR from this morning's leader board?
haha - give it time! It is coming!
1.03 / 16m
Jinxed....... tut tut tut Chris
Some never learn
Hehehe