Gordon Stein, CFO of CleanTech Lithium, explains why CTL acquired the 23 Laguna Verde licenses. Watch the video here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
I had read some of these from last year of R1 - absolutely scathing of the previous management although product appeared to be decent
However the more recent reviews are much better. Here’s an extract from one from last month: “We always had good products but management were clueless and sucked the soul out of the place. In a month the Taptica management are re-energising the place and putting structures in place which could make this the most exciting ride of my career”
Seems like Taptica work fast, and the focus will return towards growth rather than cost cutting (although with the string of acquisitions in recent times perhaps Singer’s efforts were necessary)
from shaggy , Stt1 sold out of Totally snookered , did he , who told you that him , and you believe that.
Shaggy , who are the people that are supporting his de - ramping and agreeing with him and drawing attention to his posts ?
He is a scoundrel and you know it .
Shaggy I suspect for a long time that you are in the camp of stt1 .
Name the people you suspect of dodgy behaviour. I think it is you Dr Shaggy and have done for a long time.
I am 85% down , how many times have you mentioned that ?
from drshaggy:
"Meanwhile, stt1 and the bunch of people who support his de-ramping on here (along with some of those who are 'supposedly' against him but constantly keep drawing attention to his posts) are a actually a network of amateur shorters.
Ultimately, ramping or de-ramping these shares at this amateur level doesn't make a jot of difference. This is nothing like the organised network of shorters involved in the original Blinkx short of 2014. The SP will be decided by ongoing results posted by the company."
I cannot agree with the first paragraph as it suggests that anyone disagreeing and highlighting stt1's posts may be a shorter in disguise. That is tantamount to saying that if anyone posts in reaction to stt1 they may be guilty by association.
Certainly the sp will be decided by results alone (depending on expectations) but when someone posts one-sided comments of an obsessively negative nature it is only natural to point this out.
Over £150k bought before the close
Enjoy the weekend
Needs results, plain and simple. And they need to be good results.
According to this website there have been over 86000 buys today with 16000 sells yet the share price falls by 1.00 p. Similar the other day with massive surplus to the buy side yet price fell by 2.00 p. How can this be ??
At this rate we will be lucky to ever see the price retrace back to 200p let alone ever get anywhere near the 770 p broker target which seems just a mirage.
Less than two weeks to AGM. Let’s hope they have an update for us.
Only 6 months left before CCPA becomes effective..
Hot on the heels of GDPR - more changes to ad tech ecosystem..
As CCPA’s Deadline Looms, Tech and Media Brace for Another GDPR
Readiness for the privacy act is the industry's No. 1 priority
https://www.adweek.com/digital/as-ccpas-deadline-looms-tech-and-media-brace-for-another-gdpr/
Must admit, Dr Shaggy, I much prefer the filter button.
PS: I haven't read anything by stt1 for months, even in response to my own comments. I don't filter him, you don't need to if you just ignore him anyway.
I strongly recommend that course of action to others.
Or as our “Fake Resident Fortune Teller” would say....
As EXPECTED ??
You're wasting your time posting about Totally on this board mate. Stt1 bailed about a month ago. Just check his post history. He quietly sold out at a loss after ramping Totally just as much as he de-ramps TAP.
As for Totally, they're on their way. A desperate attempt to gain £9 million to buy Greenbrook so the can extract the cash pile prior to Totally hitting the deck.
These are money movers just like RhythmOne players.
I'm glad my money (still 85% down on my original Blinkx purchase) is in TAP rather than TLY. I know which of the two is likely to go bust soonest, and it isn't TAP IMHO.
Meanwhile, stt1 and the bunch of people who support his de-ramping on here (along with some of those who are 'supposedly' against him but constantly keep drawing attention to his posts) are a actually a network of amateur shorters.
Ultimately, ramping or de-ramping these shares at this amateur level doesn't make a jot of difference. This is nothing like the organised network of shorters involved in the original Blinkx short of 2014. The SP will be decided by ongoing results posted by the company.
If TAP grow revenue and profits the SP will take care of itself.
If people are truly opposed to stt1 and his ilk then ignore them. Stop giving oxygen to his views by constantly drawing attention to his comments while still proclaiming that you ignore him anyway.
Totally diluted….as predicted. Bmac
http://www.lse.co.uk/share-regulatory-news.asp?shareprice=TLY&ArticleCode=x2j1uije&ArticleHeadline=Proposed_acquisition_of_Greenbrook_Healthcare
Tremor sold its DSP off to Taptica in August 2017, citing:
1) A possible perceived conflict of interests as the reason that their clients were not fully committing themselves.
2) More importantly Tremor Video CEO Mark Zagorski said “It was a challenge to manage two sides of the business with the (huge) kind of scale we had, so we decided to focus on the sell-side where we had solid technology,”
Taptica looked at other businesses in the sector to expand its presence geographically and extend its offering in the media-buying space, but it chose Tremor Video owing to its scale.
Taptica's ssp and dsp operations are now held in independent companies thus negating any suggested (not actual proven) belief that a conflict of interest may arise.
The predictably stupid, one-sided, slanted allegations by stt1 make for poor reading.
stt1 , Precisely why it was posted . Not sure Brita will see your post as he has you filtered for obvious reasons.
I hope you are not going too start your nonsense again or another red card could be served , only for longer this time.
Brita,
The article is referring to Telaria - check the ticker code, TLRA...
Telaria was called Tremor Video before they sold their DSP, TremorDSP to Taptica...
Telaria has nothing to do with TremorDSP, which is owned by Taptica.
Tremor Video sold TremorDSP to Taptica because the full stack created conflict of interest...
rthm operated a full stack for years and they made losses for years... now, after merging with rthm, Taptica operate the full stack...
Telaria: An Enticing Small Cap SSP
"Prior to August 2017, Telaria was known as Tremor Video. Tremor Video was both a DSP (demand side platform) and an SSP (supply side platform) in the programmatic advertising space."
"before August 2017, Tremor Video was both a DSP and an SSP. This creates conflicts of interests, though, when one company is involved in both the buying and selling of ad inventory. Upon finally realizing this, the company sold off its DSP business for $50 million. So, Tremor Video rebranded as solely an SSP under the name, Telaria."
https://seekingalpha.com/article/4206417-telaria-enticing-small-cap-ssp
Tremor Video, now Telaria, reasons for selling their TremorDSP to Taptica.. perceived conflict of interest
"Clients were also uneasy with Tremor servicing both the buy- and sell-sides."
"There's always been a little bit of friction because we were selling agencies and advertisers different products while we were representing publishers," Zagorski said. "And the people who plug into that sell-side platform would always be somewhat hesitant to commit to it in a huge way because we had that perceived conflict."
https://adexchanger.com/digital-tv/tremor-video-sells-demand-side-business-taptica-50m/
https://seekingalpha.com/article/4206417-telaria-enticing-small-cap-ssp
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/tremor-video-tlra-outpaced-other-133001355.html
I think figures for rthm for fy2019 would be very important, given that the recent launches have just been previous rthm offerings re-launched. as TAP offerings. Rthm figures would show whether these offerings were previously successful when part of rthm..
Let's see if they provide any rthm fy2019 figures during the AGM.
Very quiet here. Is this a positive? Good luck all.
In ten years of trading/investing I have never seen that before. Very odd.
Also, massive sell at the end of day, and some fairly hefty selling during the day. And the SP holds firm. Also odd...
Spring cleaning?
Why have November 2018 trades just been put through??
"It will require a few months of buy backs to reduce these figures from128 million to have any affect on the SP"
Yes! So no point paying over the odds on a daily basis when the sp will just fall back again regardless.
It's a common mistake to believe that buybacks make the sp rise steadily.
It will require a few months of buy backs to reduce these figures from128 million to have any affect on the SP
Safi, I would be very happy with $200m for H1. Don’t forget there will only be one quarter of revenue from R1 c60m and c140m from Tap.