The latest Investing Matters Podcast episode featuring Jeremy Skillington, CEO of Poolbeg Pharma has just been released. Listen here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
Here is the most accurate post you will read on here.
Nobody on here has a clue whats going on!
Only one bloke who thinks he knows but he is banned from posting.
Hello nob hows them spuds.
Why do you think??
Lies after lies
Why would there be a placing if we are likely to get a credit line from BPM?
And if so, where does the SP end up 🙈
Is it a placing news?
True dat.
All those sells past few months compared to buys.
Where are the shares going??
“ But if someone wanted to transfer funds , they could do it outside of the market for zero cost and fees and without bringing down the SP.”
So so true 😞. Worse than I thought..
Fair response.
Let’s wait and see. Either way, it’s being played!
Well I've been watching it 4 years and previously it was sell sell sell and then buy buy buy. With small trades used to hold I up when selling and down when buying.
Least that's how it looked.
It's a common technique, which is illegal but can't really be proven, but can only be pulled off by those with major holdings.
Lately, I Don't see any buying back, least not for the last 3-4month.
And given TAG owes money and has financial responsibilities and happens to be a huge stake holder. Then it would make logical sense.
Also CH trading hub is basically an anonymous fund in which somebody could easily wash their money and if they haven't managed to fill the subscription with their own investors then could just as easy be filled with TAG money or AZ money or both, to meet the required fund to satisfy the terms of the WL agreement.
Of course I could be wrong and you could be right.
But if someone wanted to transfer funds , they could do it outside of the market for zero cost and fees and without bringing down the SP.
I think this is the only time I disagree with you lucky. For me, this looks totally manipulative in terms of transferring of stock. I could be totally wrong, but why hold the price up?
I do think this is AZ or TAG trying to scrape the 1.5m to put toward the WL deal.
Just a theory though. Can't see who else could be selling for this long
91m shares sold in a single transaction @ c. 0.0026p. Ouch!
Eh??
*************c/1465294176/57908
Did you consider how much money needs to be WL IMd just to provide enough to break even?
I mean if we got a credit line of 5m , do you know how much that equates to in figures?
Henchking, I see your regular posts and shake my head, you are ramping this constantly, new people to this will see your posts and potentially think you know what you’re talking about, please stop!!
Yes.
I’ve listened to various posters here in particular TwoGood and his statement that SYME will get a credit line so averaged down again today! My average is now around 0.25 and I am now crossing my fingers for the promised WL news in the near future
Az might be early this time
No following here my good friend! Just people seeing and stating the truth!
I see an old firm favourite on social media has also had enough… people starting to see sense apart from you and a handful of others it seems..
P congrats on your new following here jemini could be you right hand man maybe?
ATB all holders
#leaderontheuninvested
#skeggyfalacy
Banks don't tend to offer insurance products either, they also white label via established providers. The same for consultancies and outsourcing partners - these are all established companies with a track record of delivery.
You've explained the traditional funding model - I get the premise behind that, I had a fair sum invested based on my understanding - it's the WL aspect I'm struggling with.
As part of BPM's due diligence, they're going to look at a business with a product that hasn't got off the ground in 4+ years, that has numerous critics and a CEO who has been - to be kind - economical with the truth, and they're going to lend their considerable weight to white labelling this product? Is this what we're expected to believe now?
Just to add Banoco BPM will no doubt badge WL IM as their own lending product to clients with the actual behind the scenes service delivery outsourced to SYME.
Does it really matter if SYME's name appears on the new lending product...not really I'm sure banks use thousands of different suppliers including software support that they don't advertise the use of for confidentiality and commercial reasons..normal stuff really!
Fiisch
Banks don't buy and hold inventory its not within their remit to do regulatory and governance requirements hence you need a third party to provide this service.
A sale and purchase of inventory which can be monetarised has to occur risk needs to be managed through a spread of investors investing in electronic tokens through a virtual trading platform.
Specic software needs to be deployed to deliver an end to end solution to capture the buy and sell back of inventory as well as the monetisation through bank funding and asset managed funds. As well as providing pricing and credit risk functionality as investment tokens are tradeable on the open market to other third parties hence more regulation to be met here.
There are numerous legal, tax, accounting, audit, regulatory hurdles to overcome which makes what appears to be a simple process very complex.
Multiple jurisdictions add further legal abd regulatory challenges.
Ergo banks can't enage in WL IM.
Hence your analysis and hence comparisons are fundamentally flawed.