We would love to hear your thoughts about our site and services, please take our survey here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
Hi JR.
There have been several instances of people being in too deep here. There’s a lot if posters all in or not diversified.
Not everything is a conspiracy, some people are genuinely helpful on both sides of the debate.
Come on guys keep it up, JR persuaded me to put my TV license money into this and I still dont have my crest cert to admire..
Guess that’s a no then PMSL :-)
DYOR !
How would you know that it is more than someone can afford? the premise of the troll/deramp crew members "I'm here trying to protect new investors from losing money" simply never rings true or makes sense! as you would need to know each persons personal financial situation which obviously you wouldn't have a clue from an anonymous BB would you!
Such disingenuous vile humans members of these deramp crews.
Hi Peak. I guess I fit your category.. Please point out which was the stupid question? I’m not easily offended. And as for your suggestion, you know I’m not invested, so please can you give me an email address or a contact number for non investors to contact SYME? Many thanks in anticipation of your reply.
Wolfo...lol, ....proper banter. , i love it..:)
Not saying they need to be nice /slate each other away- but at the moment / if i ramp a company / post false twitter links / post a fake customer (Carrefour) / - they have a record of a card /& mobile with my address/-posters would think twice - if police are called in/ need to investigate At the moment- if i was invested i could make up anything to boost the share and my bank balance / ramp the company-....with no comeback..!!! Im going to be p*ssed off when im invested and its not what its been ramped to be, loosing money- surely it makes sense to clamp down on this practice.
The police .... they don’t have resources when actual crimes have been committed. Let alone when a bunch of people on an Internet forum lose a bit of paper money betting on a company that they don’t really understand.
It’s getting more and more comical in here lol.
As for a £1 subscription, another clueless idea. LSE are not going to bite the hand that feeds them ffs.
We all know who's started this off tonight, if anyone is really interested in ownership of syme and all its board and needs clarification/transparency email AZ/syme and ask for clarification, don't post your doubts on here and try and pass it off as an innocent enquiry, LTH are not stupid , certain poster's have absolutely nothing positive to add to the board and constantly quote "DYOR" then ask stupid questions, DYOR into ownership and question transparency by emailing syme , invest or don't , then fcuk off
The ones that ask the same questions and never bite.
Discouraging people from ploughing in more than they can afford..
@phippso - Harrods..... ;)
Not saying they need to be nice /slate each other away- but at the moment / if i slate a company / post false accusations / post a fake web site / - they have a record of a card /& mobile with my address/-posters would think twice - if police are called in/ need to investigate At the moment- if i wasnt invested i could make up anything to destroy the share / defame the company-....with no comeback..!!! Im going to be p*ssed off when im invested, loosing money- surely it makes sense to clamp down on this practice.
Now gave you ever thought some of these posters MAY actually work for LSE?
“Do you really think LSE are going to go out of their way to regulate this board further.
Nice idea but just take a look at the advertising it generates....viewers bring that and with it revenue.
Conflict, arguments and even a little discussion if you are lucky tots up the postings count.
its all about the money.”
Parkez has nailed it.
Been going on for years,will continue for many years yet.Posters come and they go...but its an addiction.
Some leave but most return in one form or another.
Of course if human nature was to suddenly change and we all started to be nice to each other , just like the majority would be if talking face to face instead of suddenly growing a pair behind a keyboard Then there would be no need for such measures.
Maybe one day eh?
I understand its revenue / generating.. it takes the same amount of time to register to premium / to basic -£1 one off payment.
It means that at the moment -i can make up a fake account / fake address and register-={ 1 post wonders / paid derampers- ]- get kicked off and register in minutes in a different name -alias. That is a joke- no ? Da is a perfect example / different accounts- even admits it.ffs. Is too easy - to post fake / slanderous comments on a company/ with no comeback,
LSE need to address this-
Surely it is in their best interests to do so... the more and more people that get ****ed off with it the more people will leave their site. They'll get a reputation amongst investors and traders that they are a site for trolls
Do you really think LSE are going to go out of their way to regulate this board further.
Nice idea but just take a look at the advertising it generates....viewers bring that and with it revenue.
Conflict, arguments and even a little discussion if you are lucky tots up the postings count.
its all about the money.
Furthermore, I think there should be an option to report an account and not just a message. If that said person gets enough people reporting against it, LSE investigates and they deem that person to be a de-ramper or ramper then they get banned.
ettrading, certainly agree with you, there really does need to be more in terms of vetting to become a basic member on LSE. So many trolls and is so incessant at times.
If they can't provide more in terms of vetting, as I could see it being difficult, then if they could moderate the chats better that would be good. It's so obvious to see if someone is a de-ramper or ramper.
Simple and fantastic idea ET - Respect
I would do it. Not often seen a spark of genius lol, pat on the back son!
We would really start to see less sh it stains on the walls of the bb, to discover those beautiful floral patterns or a huge picture of NASA Apollo with ignited launch, yes yes!
GLA LTHH’s
Excellent ET that's what it needs
Hello,
[emailed to to LSE ]
There is a considerable amount of blatant lies from non registered / non traceable accounts on the forums.
Very easy to post fake websites / create fake identities to ramp / de-ramp/ defame without any trace.
I am a an investor with considerable money – yet it is allowed by non entities to post / disrupt / lie with no comeback. I have a premium account and provided my card details which are traceable / my mobile number and address. Can I suggest that LSE vets these 1 post members by getting a £1 payment / to verify the card / address / and mobile number to match to the address. Surely this will create a better platform for discussion / remove paid de-ramping / fake listings / fake links / causing people without redress to lose considerable sums of money. I am considering trading Standards involved to look into the whole practice of allowing fake accounts to take advantage of this service / with no address / creating a gambling platform in effect for shorters,
Hopefully you can consider this / even give a blue ribbon to distinguish basic membership from serious paid investors/ membership.
Regards
ET
I don't post much on here tbh. I come on every now and then and read alot of the deramping then get off as haven't got time to scroll through so many post from people who aren't invested in syme. One area that syme could really capitalise on that I don't think anyone has touch on its large scale building. Ie housing developments, alot of times these propertys sit empty for months without buyers usually due to the ridiculous costs. This would allow developers to get the money out of them and move on. Even if the property is empty for a period of time. I'm heavily invested here and we will do well long term. Ignore the noise all the best