We would love to hear your thoughts about our site and services, please take our survey here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
It’s coming, of that I am convinced, following which there will be a number of shareholders I will thank personally via this bb. All will be revealed.
Savvy, no need to be down, Peak, Apunter2 and others, doing a great job on this board. Well done, it really is appreciated.
Mick his games up,, an ex trader who doesn’t have a clue about warrants,
Well written articulate posts won’t save him here,
6 clients IMed via the fund, revenue £271k, extrapolated to £3mill per client average.
Each client £45k average..
Wanna see it all again
And Pat the dog …
If you want to argue with me you’ll need to buy some shares to do it .. as you’ll need the register
But you can’t can you.. as nothing like a bitter twisted man..
Oh god, I am going to have to read his crap again..
Fail, BS,, oh a truth, as recently every time he opens his mouth on subject like warrants or bonds he’s shown himself a fool..
BS,, the shares are not Negma, it’s a service .. told ya and told ya .. get the register..
It’s liquidity, blah blah
No economic interest - as I have asked for a year now … say something positive on Syme Expat
Warrant price.. nope fail again, the R in Benc R means incomplete portfolio.
So it’s a benchmark price on the average… etc etc … buying in the tradEcho.. blah blah
So one entity is adding liquidity, MM’s drop on liquidity, scoop up the share for ii buying via tradEcho.. pi gets to buy, MM’s make money everyone happy apart from pi, who suffer in the drop.
However, this liquids is needed for the rise too, or the sp going nowhere as no one will be able to buy
Are we catching on yet as I am sick to death of the crap here…
Extrader, wrap your posts in financial and market terms because your well written English isn’t cutting it in the £ shillings and pence game.
Warrant trade … god that was funny.. We don’t even have the warrants exercised.
Go on extrader say something nice about SYME ..
That said your narrative continues to be one of negativity, you may have caused some with relatively small amounts invested to sell and or stopped some from investing. In essence because you will not countenance any positive aspect of Syme, to me you are no different to the cold calling Nigerian Princess, that pray, particularly on elderly people claiming they have millions and need financial support to get out their Country.
Gotham, what part of 'I have no economic interest' don't you understand ?
Some comments are at least 'interesting...but irrelevant'.
Yours aren't even interesting.
Extrader this for you too.
What Is a Stock Basher?
A stock basher is a person engaging in an illegal type of market manipulation to make the price of an asset fall. Stock bashers rely on misinformation campaigns to decrease confidence in a stock, leading to an undervaluation of that stock. In some cases, a stock basher may have a position in the asset which benefits from a fall in price.
Understanding Stock Bashers
The term stock basher refers to a person who spreads false or exaggerated claims against a public company in attempt to devalue a stock. The purpose of stock bashing is usually to drive down the price of a stock so that the stock basher, or the basher’s employer, may purchase the stock at a lower price than it would otherwise be worth.
Thats youre opinion Pat
.." opinion on where you see the SP over next few weeks and months?"
No idea. I don't think (on the info currently available) that IM will work as was originally projected, OTOH a pivot to TF might (again, on the info currently available) .
BTW, as I've said before, I have no economic interest either way......and am not 'in cahoots' with anyone else.
Pat has a scripted narrative and will not alter course I suspect Hallowed was
Yeah ok Pat
.."I only stated facts Pat from the RNS...'
Your 0913 :
Some one gets a loan today to buy 10% of a bank???
Yesterday was the last day of the Arc vwap.
And I'm not Pat.
You've heard the saying 'Better to keep quiet - and be thought a fool - than to open your mouth and remove all doubt '?
You take it a stage further and provide evidence in writing.
Ex, would you care to give an opinion on where you see the SP over next few weeks and months? Continuing the downward trend or do you see a reversal happening? Cheers in advance.
I only stated facts Pat from the RNS...
Could be !
You're speculating on one interpretation, Gotham in another.
I only stated the facts.
Well, it would give a second reason (after Negma) to explain the recent s/price weakness.
So you should welcome it.
From extrader
A cynic might observe that it's in the family office interest to see the reference price lower...
And if anyone knows about cynics its surely the above. He's got aa degree in it.
Whole threads disappearing every day. Group of rampers and derampers deleting each other posts. Its a parody like AZ constant undelivering. Will he ever deliver main news? September supposed to be a month with big news? Lets see
“It doesn't tell you when the loan is available (and drawn).”
——
Agreed…they are unlikely to inform us ‘we’ve signed the definitive agreement and have drawn down’ to settle the residual portion (£2.1m) of CLN with Negma.
However, let’s assume Negma started disposing of their shares (up to max 25%/day) the day after the RNS of 2.9.21 - based on an average of just 350m shares x 25% = 88m/day.
This means Negma could already be out over last 10 days (as that is their M.O. as part of issuing CLNs).
Assuming the definitive agreement is now signed, Arc loan can be drawn down and Negma repaid, then no reason to deny that the:
“exercise price of 130% of the lowest closing VWAP over the ten days immediately preceding the issue of the loan”…is not now taking place.
Personally I think that would make sense. GL.
good advice extrader-gotham
That tells you the qualifying period for establishing the warrant price.
It doesn't tell you when the loan is available (and drawn).
Think about it : SYME is issuing warrants as a 'reward' for getting the cash, it'll want to know it's got the cash first.
A cynic might observe that it's in the family office interest to see the reference price lower....
Ex read.
Warrants will be issued for 20% of the GBP7 million loan value. The warrants will have a term of 3 years and exercise price of 130% of the lowest closing VWAP over the ten days immediately preceding the issue of the loan.
Thanks for clearing that up
Not necessarily.
The 10 days you refer to is linked to the reference period for pricing the warrants.
The RNS dated 2 Sept about the ARC-arranged loan said that a term sheet had been agreed and that the loan was subject to the execution of the definitive agreement.
Maybe the loan HAS been provided, maybe not.