We would love to hear your thoughts about our site and services, please take our survey here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
The silence from Fraser says 1000 words
Best value for share holders .thats questionable
Knowledge of it being sold on the cheap though.........!
along with that statement.........!
All the best (a very wonky line that looks............ :)
The journos interpretation of what he said..........!
whilst, off record, and probs travelling from site to site.............?
Also, the re-buff.......... were AAL at the table at the time ............ or not........?
All the best (I don't expect you to answer those questions IBAB, I 'd much rather CF did :)
Bucky The main difference between rules and laws is the consequences associated with breaking them. While each is developed to invoke a sense of order, fair play, and safety, the weight of a law is much heavier than the weight of a rule. Laws are like the legal version of rules.
Corporate governance and directors duties. https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/3-597-4626?transitionType=Default&contextData=(sc.Default)
calamari - on a boundary between rights of expressing opinions, assumptions (letting all creativity and imagination going wild) and stating facts there's no reliable mechanism in legal practice to build proof leading to conviction in these cases. It is a very different approach if company representatives/officials say something in public space acting at this capacity.
An off the cuff remark, made to a journo, during an off the topic conversation...........!
And you, I or her still don't know to which side of the camp CF was referring, only CF does..........!
All the best (sweatpants........... is a troll term, rather than the more positive end :()
.......or the Dog just takes the lead.......... :()
and phones all his doggy mates about whats happening...........!
All the best (woof woof :)
Chesh that’s an easy one, the dogs a designated driver.
“ I assume you have a point, or are you just going to post all the rules...?“
Bucky none of your business.
"A man walk into a bar, leaves his dog outside............"
All the best (not the end of the story so far............ :)
Civil market abuse
The Market Abuse Regulation (MAR) sets out the civil market abuse regime and prohibits insider dealing, improper disclosure of inside information and market manipulation.
Chris s missus, probably with him in there bunger .planning there return down under
Ibab. It’s not up to us to supply evidence. The authorities investigate and supply that. It depends whether the decide to follow up.
Bucky it’s got nothing to do with you.
I understand leases
I’m weighing up at the moment whether go in Sirius even larger.....especially if it dips slightly, say to 5.25.
Bellers - as we all know there's always a chance of risk (for one side) and possibility of opportunity (for another)
Will see as for now it's all speculation and guessing (although action taken based on analysis of this information does matter much for our pockets)
I'm still committed to throw into a pot (or furnace) if path of additional equity raise is selected at last moment (with up to 80% dilution)
The problem with P (or whoever it is with alternative) is timing, SXX has a long backlog of short-term delayed (long enough already) liabilities (negotiated with service/equipment suppliers) plus bond coupons, so liquidity situation is critical, suppliers are nervous (and won't extend)
As a result - competitive to AAL option needs £300M-£400M outright (in April) and not everyone can afford sinking money into market (buying shares) and getting money ready for offer at the same time (even if it's external finance coming with interest)
scott1092 - I'm not sure how your model works? Lease is binding contract: land is used (the way it's agreed) or not used - but money do get paid, landowners only in loss if sxx goes into admin (no money to pay)
Does sxx have a business contract and schedule with amounts for charity payments?
Hi Yuri.F. I suppose I wish they were now looking at him as untrustworthy and lacking in morals. Ah well.
However, been looking at Polygon and where (if at all) they fit in this larger play. A snippet from their website.
Corporate Restructuring: participation in recapitalisations and balance sheet deleveraging via equity issues
M&A: favouring hostile, cross-border or otherwise complex transactions more likely to be misunderstood by the market
Dislocation: medium-duration, high-conviction trades with significant upside potential
Special Situations: “piggybacking” on corporate activism and/or pre-deal opportunities.
Is there any possibility that they are about to throw a spanner into the works and join in with the first “ unviable” offer that was rejected?
Land leaaes not happy at all .pretty ****ed off from what you hear. National parks .no support now
... employees, DMC/StraBag, Gov, etc. etc..)
Well said Fred - let’s see what they come back with?
Bellers - CF is jut temp middleman, Torps will very likely be respected (or bought back with interest premium),
company will produce and supply Poly as planned
So no harm done, for those who's signed torps - it doesn't really matter, all this fuzz is quite neutral to other parties involved (bond holders, very likely land leases, employees, etc. etc..) only unhappy side are shareholders (well - most of them, remaining 40K I guess?)
'chalk this up to experience and move on '...….but herein lies the rub .some can move on ….many can't …..this thing will eat away at them for ever .