London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East and have access to Premium Chat. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
If it was that good they would offer it for free and take a slice of the find....however they may have more success than pin the tail on the donkey Brian M.
Hope this kills the cheap and desperate sales pitch although I have little doubt this Scotforth crowd will try again in future. What puzzles me is how they believe that this bb could be a sales channel to put pressure on Sound leadership to buy their services. We may be in serious trouble but never that much.
Hmm, I don't think I need a coffee to discuss your previous deals etc. Firstly I'm not interested, secondly someone somewhere may object to what was privileged info.
In our call you also felt the need to rush off but managed to advise me to email for info on predator...
And like I said - if you're genuinely in possession of valuable info that could help shareholders past and present recoup losses then you should do the honourable thing... Instead you want to mock those who may have lost fortunes, and give out your address?
You obviously have a desire to be kept busy in retirement but the facts remain:
You're the one chasing shadows to flog satellite images to sound endrgy
And you're the multi $billion deal maker who failed to strike a deal with sound energy worth mere thousands, and came off looking like a lunatic.
You see, living within walking distance of Blighs I've often met various sound energy employees on trips to the High Street and Station and managed to cross reference your claims and statements since we spoke....
AGAIN KASJNATON and GRH try to GROOM some more suckers into the TINPOT ventures of SCOTFORTH.
UNDERHAND business PRACTICES.
I AM 250 and KNOW MORE THAN ALL OF YOU IDIOTS
PS I HAVE A FERRARI...
By VERY public, do you mean that it was shared on advfn and lse bb'? In which case, your definition of VERY public was that fewer than 500 folk, in the world, were made aware of it. And even fewer cared. So don't make yourself out to be more relevant than you actually are. Trying to big yourself up on a free bb to anonymous posters makes you sound pretty desperate and very needy.
(who called yourself John when you called me
but would not mention your surname)
I have just been informed of your post
How wonderful to have such coincidence…
We used to live in Kippington Road...top end beyond the church
We then moved to :
big garden...corner of Wildernesse Avenue and Seal Drive...
check the signage if you wish!
one sign each side of the vehicular gates and one at end of fence
moved here in 1985
If you want coffee as you appear so convenient in Sevenoaks just let me know
if you let me have your email address I will show you what $22bn of deals looks like
ATB to genuine people who have lost their money here
As to Waterhouse...
anyone on iii/ADVFN will tell you of my ceasing all comms with him
and closing down a dormant outfit where he and I were both shareholders
it was VERY public at the time
You see shadows
but truth is you appear to have lost a lot of money and that is regrettable
Thanks for that link truthful. I see one of the directors of RG Petroleum was none other than Robert Waterhouse....who was single handedly responsible for many, many GKP PI's to lose an awful lot of money. It is all beginning to fall into place unfortunately. I wonder if Kasnation is Robert Waterhouse? Hopefully trellis isn't swimming with the sharks......
Lol, I don't claim to be a scientist...but if this tech uses satellite imaging, and wavelengths - what is so different to using 3D sesimic?
Anyway, why is this kasjnaton so obsessed with trying to prove it works and then claiming he is still learning? Looks like this grh has multiple accounts....
The other reason I suspect this grh to be an elderly twisted bull shi773r is he claimed to live on wilderness avenue in sevenoaks - when in fact he lives OFF a road on wilderness avenue....doesn't appear to be the big shot he claimed to be...
You see GRH, what I didn't tell you is I also live in Sevenoaks - granted it's not the the prestigious Wilderness Ave which is round the corner from you but in Kippington which is glorious enough for me and the family and nobody has the need to be pretentious...
Not going to mention his full name, but GRH has been involved in a lot of small companies, insurance based, and other petroleum based ones...his mate in scotland who IS actually a director of scotforth doesn't seem to put his head above the parapet, so it is a weird setup indeed...if anyone does want to do some digging to understand what i'm hinting at: RG Petroleum on companies house is all you need to search for.
Kasjnaton: "provide scientifically validated papers backing up their opinions that detection of hydrocarbons using hyperspectral imagery is not possible, then please provide that documentation, or at least a link to it so that I am able to read why it is not possible".
I don't know if you have any scientific background, but you ought to know that isn't how science operates. Scientists don't publish papers disproving the possibility of something. Have you checked the end of your garden for a crock o' gold? After all, there are no published papers that prove leprechauns don't exist.
That tech hyperspectral imaging is available direct and is very cheap as it’s a byproduct of work carried out with certain satellites.
Maybe was just too expensive and it only backs up what existing technologies closer to the ground can already attain.
Such a company should if convinced sell the data to shareholders. Or give us an appraisal package, a demonstration. After all Sound, won’t buy, does appear strange won’t sell to a shareholder?
Kas, there is no money to drill, don't you understand simple accountancy, cash will run out December 2020, we need production to get finance, develop the horst, look at high cos leads around the horst, there's over 1 TCF of gas to appraise. No low cos high value drilling for at least 5 years. That's the new business model, either top up and lower your average or just move on in life, I know what I'm doing.
Blimey. So desperate for somebody to pay money for the mumbo jumbo, unproven technology that he posts into the early hours of the morning on a free bb.
well, atm, there's only one other...easily done...no big deal
Ffs... . How much is it to use this Scotforth tech? Anyone know?
How is it to use this Scott forth tech? Anyone know?
Forgot to add that not only shall I shut up on this subject but I will also pay up the agreed sum of money to the chosen charity and offer a full and unreserved apology to everyone on this BB.
I know that the only way some people will get their original investment back is by Sound Energy drilling in a location where substantial commerical hydrocarbons are to be found.
Once again I ask the question, how is that to be done? Additional pure wildcat drill(s) with the data that we currently have or bring on board Scotforth to reduce risk help identify where to drill?
Last point I shall repeat if there is evidence that hyperspectral imagery, the Scotforth tech is ineffective in finding commercial hydrocarbons please let me know and I shall shut up on this subject.
Tableleg, I did not ask that you or anyone else put any money up if your negativitiy about the tech is wrong.
All I asked for is for anyone who thinks that the Scotforth tech is a worthless is to provide me with the evidence as to why, because I want to know more, I am curious, I wish to learn and understand.
That is why I did my research in the first instance, which has so far lead me to believe that the tech is genuine, in that it helps to reduce risk when searching for commercial hydrocarbons, thus the reason for me providing those links.
I can of course afford more than a mere £100 to any charity but thought it a good starting point.
I shall tell you what tableleg, £200 is a cheap price to pay for a lesson, find that evidence that states that it is not possible to identify abundant commercial hydrocarbons using hyperspectral imaging and I shall pay that to a charity of your choice.
If £200 is insufficient then let me know how much you would want in order to even consider to start looking for such evidence we can then start a discussion.
As for your point, it may or may not work, why did GRH bother posting the information that he had?
Why does he claim to be 100% accurate with the analysis of where Sound would drill , whether Badile or Tendrara, why did Sound not make use of this technology? GRH claims to have been in contact with Sound, surely questions need to be asked of all relevant parties, BM, JP and GRH, in order to get to the bottom of what happened, what did Sound actually think of the Scotforth Tech, why did they not utilise it etc.
A number of posters on here seem to think that only they matter, i.e. they are only a few k down and would break even when the micro LNG project comes online.
Some people are really naive, throwing good money after bad as the saying goes, in bringing their average down in order to try and break even, I just think this is too risky at this moment in time (as I already have said).
There are some people here who are severly underwater, no doubt suffering depression, ill health and worse because of what has happened.
I am neither in a position to give false hope as I am just an underwater PI like many others, nor am I able to solve their problems.
All I want is for the truth to come out, and there are people posting their opinions without backing those opinions up.
Yes I may be wrong about the refinancing negotiations, I may be wrong about the amount of gas in Tendrara, I may be wrong about the Scotforth Tech. but I am not misleading by quoting mooncheeses £62 per share, or even SG47's £2.50 per share at least, or even Crudettehopelessness' I have paid off my mortgage so I am OK therefore everythnig else is going to work out fine.
Kas it may work it may not but the company chose not to use it. You're shouting at parked cars. If they change their mind then I will support them. If it was that simple you wouldn't be wasting your time on a free bb.
Trellis, I wish you all the best for you and 'K'.
If what you state is true then I hope that you treat her with the respect and decency that she deserves.
OK, so you guys are saying that it is boo looks, that it brings no value to the table and that Super Majors are not interested in it.
Well have a look at page 11 in the PDF at the link below;
That should counter the "adds no value to the table" and also the "boo looks" statement.
I have of course posted the above link previously but not a single person has commented up on it, go figure I wonder why that is? Maybe people just prefer to ignore the facts as presented to them.
As for Super majors, have a look at the following link;
It is, admittedly, only an abstract but the scientificallly peer reveiwed document has the following acknowledgement;
The authors thank the Environmental Baseline and GIS & Remote Sensing teams of ChevronTexaco in Richmond and San Ramon, California, for discussions that led to this study on the use of the 1.73?µm hydrocarbon feature to derive a Hydrocarbon Index. We further thank F. Lehmann, F. Oschütz and T. Bucher (German Aerospace Centre, DLR, Berlin-Adlershof) for discussions and advice on calibration and correction of HyMap data. R.C. Newcomb is thanked for improvement of the English text.
So Chevron/Texaco are aware of this technology, not super major enough for you?...
But of course it is all boo looks, isn't it?
If any nay sayer can provide something (anything?) outside of their closed minded opinions on this subject and provide scientifically validated papers backing up their opinions that detection of hydrocarbons using hyperspectral imagery is not possible, then please provide that documentation, or at least a link to it so that I am able to read why it is not possible.
A proper discussion can then take place, and if for all this time I have been in the wrong then I would offer a full and unreserved apology to everyone, not only that but also I would give £100 to the charity of choice to that person who finds such documentation.
I would be prepared to donate more but funds are limited after my poor decision to invest in Sound...
Yawn. I would think she would be the one reaching for the Soave. Electric company.
On a different note why would anyone want a self confessed drunk to represent them here. You’re hardly selling yourself to the masses !!
So during the "lovely chat", you decide to log onto an irrelevant bb and tell anonymous avatars that you are having a "lovely chat". Blimey.
totally off topic but having a lovely talk with wannabe 6. I am half out of the doghouse and hoping I can reach my soave . by the way there will not be a 7 because K is absolutely stunning and the wannabe I wish I could have met many years ago.
GRH or scotforth or whoever can try to groom people and try to keep them coming back for more chronological bull - anyone with half a brain cell will see after listening to the rubbish that the main aim is to get business, which generates cash in their pockets.
Graham Lyons should do a deal which basically says if you are that confident that you cannot find the wrong place to drill - give us a spot, and if it fails, you are liable for all costs!
That ought to shut up a few people - look at the website...hardly professional...question the product and GRH gets all pedantic and defensive.
Why are the supermajors not using it? maybe because, just maybe, it doesn't bring any value to the table