Gordon Stein, CFO of CleanTech Lithium, explains why CTL acquired the 23 Laguna Verde licenses. Watch the video here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
Can't be easy being penniless.
200k on the order book at 12p tomorrow
I see donkey brains is busy again Lolzzz... Are they looking to invest in a company with a real future ;))
My apologies...
But $50m of FNV and $16.67m of Osisko equals $66.67...
However, its academic because someobdoy else will own those deals soon...
Hi DinnerMoney you are correct they can't be fully repaid. As usual Slug is wrong. He maintains his record of being 100% wrong about Solgold and everything in life.
DM, I think you're absolutely right. I didn't read it carefully enough.
I imagine the document will contain a description of the combined business, the benefits of the merger, consolidated financials, cost savings, a forecast of some description and an explanation of the strategy.
In my day this stuff would appear shortly after a deal had been announced (I wrote enough of the damn things) and was the key document seeking shareholder approval. Things must have changed and I'm struggling to understand its purpose, although I'll be very interested to read it.
For insignificant slug, check the order book for 12p from tomorrow.
Fair enough - just wondering why slug and red seem to get everything completely wrong.
@MassiveRay, if not obvious we are aggravated enough already as it is....
Nothing to seenhere until June the earliest. I'll be back sub 15p.
Does anyone know why CGP are producing a prospectus? And what is the relevance?
Normally you'd see this done prior to a vote so that shareholders would be able to understand exactly what it is they're agreeing to.
Thanks NP
Meanwhile...quiet on here today...calm before the storm...?
Or is T2 settlement post merger...was it you that suggested 27 January was D Day...?
I wonder if it would unnecessarily complicate the Prospectus/merger completion...?
And NP unless I'm mistaken, both the Osisko and FNV can be repaid...
It's clear: complete the merger, once and for all, and prospective bidders that are lined up (tick) will proceed with no further delays full stop. Not long......lets not complicate it!
GLA
Who here is the modestly self named "So-I-Was-Right" on Twitter?
NP …. Just a thought , wonder if they are trying to place the extra shares prior to merger completion?
Can’t see why they would but I’ve never been able to second guess this company
It's a good question DinnerMoney, but I think that Tandy is part Cascabel so maybe that's the plan. We await the strategic review which some on here think is a smoke screen, the same as they think everything else is a smoke screen getting us to a bid. I have been listening to that for a decade and it's wrong headed thinking every time.
Also seanhunter don't believe the people on here that now say production takes many years. You get revenue at various stages of production once we start extracting ore. Yes a full block cave operation is years away, but even after that is concluded we would continue to develop as at every stage we decide what is economic to mine. Also once above ground infrastructure is built it makes other nearby sites commercially viable as infrastructure can be shared.
Lastly l mentioned you could obtain revenue from extracting ore. Solgold have always looked at an early opencut to advance Alpala, so the great uninformed on here don't understand we don't need to raise the whole 2.9 billion as we could raise a percentage of that and become revenue producing to complete the work.
Fair enough Quady.
I have been very harsh and impatient with you in the past, but I am not happy with the way Quibbles was forced off this board and the part I played in it. I don't want anyone treated with disrespect, and I'm not here to fight with anyone and certainly not bully anyone.
You and i have diametrically opposite views on the future of SLG, but I think at least 2023 will see the argument settled one way or the other. i can certainly be patient and wait to see how things pan out.
Till then, Im sure you and i can converse like decent people who have different opinions, and i apologise for some of the things I've said to you recently in my more angry moments.
I am sorry for the last remark seanhunter, but I am of no real opinion, I just look at the facts and follow the evidence.
The point here is if we were looking at a bid in the near future, then no way would we have taken another royalty at 0.6% as this would have made us less attractive to bid for.
We took it because it is part of funding required for the advancement of Cascabel which is what the strategic review is for.
Quady, a fair enough point until the last sentence when you simply can't help trying to belittle who you are speaking to.
Why can't you be more like Quibbles? He believed in exactly what you do for this company but he managed to make his points without attacking people or being rude.
In saying that, maybe he and you are correct - maybe we re just swallowing up CGP in order to neutralise them before pushing on with production. It is a fiendish masterplan I never envisaged, but if Nick really wants to sell 10 years down the line for £5 rather than the 68p I reckon we may get this year, he is certainly the man to go for it, because SOLG is still his baby.
That type of investment would indeed be new to me, but I'd only be in it 2 minutes before I took the last of my money elsewhere.
Just had a peek addicknt.... ooooft... carnage.
Wouldn't dream of popping in to gloat but hopefully a taste of his own medicine is just what he needed.
sean, following what's happened over on his favourite share, I suspect MR is feeling a tad sheepish.
RK, yes they do count towards the total issued share capital. But in the event of a bid/sale, or any other form of corporate action, they are effectively null and void.
If they are issued to a third party they immediately regain their rights, so your second point is correct.
Seanhunter have you ever been involved with a company that has no money but has resources. I have many times over within the oil and gas sector.
When after many years if it proceeds to production which their are many ways of financing.
The price goes up massively unless we give the whole thing away. Let's await the outcome of the strategic review.
Not saying we won't have some way to go, but these things take time.
I am guessing this type of investment is new to you.