We would love to hear your thoughts about our site and services, please take our survey here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
They definitely think they're a cut above the rest.
Hahaha Bubble, what a big baby.
I think this message board is like a mental institute.
Having contacted a number of solgold jocks before I can make an educated guess at Scott's email address.
Does anyone have email addresses for any directors?
It all changes so fecking fast .
https://twitter.com/MiningVisuals/status/1650018289668567041/photo/1
We're all two a penny here ,or are you a cut above the rest?
Hey bubble
Just filter them ….. two a penny
Well done bubble , we need people like you to police the board. Sad sad sad
Anon unacceptable language there reported
Of course you did. I wish I lived on the same planet as you.
Haha DBW if my auntie had balls she'd be my uncle. All we can go by is by what we know which is very little except the share price is showing us no one is positive about this company.
I don't think I am.
You either believe it will, or will not come off.
The way some are talking,there cannot be a genuine reason they are still holding. They are just here to course trouble not to raise realistic points.
“One of the Latin American countries with the most to gain from the sustainable investment boom is Ecuador, which we feature in this issue’s special report. Despite being one of the region’s smaller countries, Ecuador has an outsized appeal for sustainable investors. Its unique combination of the Amazon, Andes, Galapagos Islands and Pacific Ocean makes it one of the most biodiverse places on the planet.
Meanwhile its untapped copper reserves, which some geologists believe could be the third largest in the world, are essential to the global energy transition. Finally, its rich mix of races, languages and cultures, coupled with centuries of a weak, impoverished state, mean that there are important social challenges to fix. In short, ESG investors can have more environmental and social impact in Ecuador than they will get in Europe”
Nowt wrong with that post Bozi. We have to hope that Caldwell and co are working on a credible Plan B whilst Maxit do their thing.
Red - I've not seen the video but speaking from painful personal experience playing badly at golf is not conducive to feeling good :) Doing pretty well I'd your having your best round ever at 74! Hats Off to you !
Me too :) :) :)
You're missing the nuance Monte.
It's possible to be negative and hold shares. Some of us are no doubt holding them out of sheer pig-headedness for fear of selling them and being wrong.
I don't think it's so much that the company is in trouble now. I don't believe that's the case, but can it be trouble in 3 months time if Bob hasn't attracted a deal that Mather considers attractive enough? Absolutely it is.
What happens if no offer materialises by say 30 June?
1.) Do they let the strategic review slide on into H2?
2) Do they call time on the strategic review, tell us we're going to push on with developing Cascabel as it's the best thing to do and refill any jobs as necessary?
That's the point I'm trying to make here. I don't see treasury as being a problem right now. We cashed up at the turn of the year and cash burn should be lower than was typically the case. However, I do think there's a largish corporate snag up ahead if Bob and Dan can't put a proposal on the table that enough shareholders will agree with.
Mistermiester,well somebody mentioned they might be offloading and I think it was mentioned 15 million to go before all out ,not sure we th they are all out or not but what was also mentioned was by May we could see a bounce coming I infact they are all out but am not sure as I don't really look at what institutions hold in solgold and who is buying etc ,more knowledgeable people on here might know imho
All the speculation about Blackrock - this is a useful watch - suggests they are focused on more dividend plays https://www.blackrock.com/uk/solutions/investment-trusts/our-range/blackrock-world-mining-investment-trust/trust-information/agm
Bozi
It makes sense to me, if someone is positive that they Continue to hold the shares.
It makes no sense that if they believe the company is doomed that they continue to hold.
It's a big difference.
One appears genuine one can't be.
Surely if they believe the company is in trouble they would sell now and be gone.
FTJNYI'll have a glass half full on friday if it bounces back over 20p lol!!:):)
For some reason FTJNY it reminds me of Leslie Nielsen's video "I play bad golf to feel good"
(PS Had the best round of my 74 years yesterday...)
Good afternoon Ortherncopper.
Fund managers are funny creatures.
That's the fund managers that pick the funds.
So many don't nowadays.
The strategic review is nothing to do with selling the company.
We understand it's the best way to advance Cascabel.
They have stated this more than once.
However like everyone else, just waiting for the strategic review to see what the next step is.
So to put it another way, of 1.635 million shares traded today (up to now), 1.242m (or 76%) were by ALGOs
And in terms of number of bargains, 117 0ut of 148 (79%)
Or to put it another way, ordinary trades were 31 inn the last 7.1/2 hours at an average of 12,600 shares per trade.
Hardly big potatoes...
So I'm interested in suggestions...is this because:
Hardly anyone is selling (holding in hope)
Hardly anyone is buying (fully loaded) or
Lost interest or
Under the radar or
Any or all of the above...
For comparison, my normal sized bargain is 100k...what is other people's experience...?
Anon there could be plenty to be positive about at the moment….. we just don’t know it ….. that’s the chance we take
Othern is Mr Doom & Gloom! His glass is always half full. He's one of those types at work who sucks all the positivity out a room! MR NEGATIVE! With people like him on your side the battle would be lost before it even began! You all know the type. Here's a problem but hasn't even considered a solution! If you were picking a team to win a match he would definitely be the last person you would pick! Sad but very true!