We would love to hear your thoughts about our site and services, please take our survey here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
Let's hope so, Q. Otherwise it's unlikely to be worth listening to.
I might suggest you weren't running the business very well if you were flat out? 🤷♂️
As you say, lots of people enjoyed my story and the SP did swing over 10% on small volume. make of that what you will. As for people I provide investment advice to, and buy on behalf of? They've made better choices than you, it would seem. I won't offer you any investment advice, I will simply point out that I've not been wrong about solg at any point. Yesterday you said that the term renewal on one of our concessions was significant. I contested it wasn't, and the markets have once again been so kind as to prove me right and you wrong.
Benefits of being a 42 year old with other people to do the hard work? I can read extensively about mining. Solg isn't my only investment, but it's the only one with an LSE board full of rampy morons who need their wings clipping. I don't think you've read a fraction of what I have about LatAm mine development, about Ecuadorian constitutional affairs, about funding... If you had, you'd realise I don't hit and hope. I read and invest. I said no TO before the '23 AGM and was told I had no clue. Months later a lot of those detractors are getting nervous as it becomes very clear I understood the path walked by solg better than them. If you want me to tell you what I think actually happens next, you can ask me for investment advice 😊
9 jobs dispatched onto today, and I'm still typing... That's good business 👍
I am unsure if we have more news to come.
Solgold must have known that the Cascabel license extension was due yesterday.
So why not hold the presentation yesterday afternoon.
Maybe we get another RNS Thursday morning.
Bizgas, to consolidate my position ref your attention seeking lies.
I may be uneducated, but if as you ridiculucy clame, you are friends wif mather. Isn't THERE rules to stop people promoting shares of THERE friends companies on a public board. Isn't it I cider feeling or soming
Re yesterday’s RNS ......
Phew.
Addicknt
Posters will only be able to contextualise their posts depending on whether they are positive or negative. Negative posters cannot believe the positivity of some posters based on the news from the company over the past several years.
Take DBW for example if an RNS landed saying a nuclear bomb had been dropped on Ecuador he would view that as positive as no one else would be able to take SOLG’s licences whereas the actual facts are it would be disastrous.
Reminds me of a former prolific poster in one of DBW’s previous investments, which by the way he was in so deep with his gambling it affected his health, who when the said company lent money to Frank Timmis ( google him) it was a great investment. Needless to say the ceo of that company is currently about to go to jail for corruption and embezzlement.
You would think DBW would learn by his mistakes, obviously not……
Now showing 1.9 down opening. Tut
Bizy. Parent not patent. Typo mate.
And as for my lack of education, better to be thick, than a downright liar.
Mates with nm. Funniest thing I've ever read.
Also mate. You need help with your attention seeking lies. Far more than I need educating.
Opening 1.5% down again today. Tut
Who are these 2 posters agarcu and needalife everyone keeps mentioning ? they both sound like a couple of desperate school kids who should think about applying some of their energy to charitable causes and hopefully do some good to each of their neighbourhoods...
Have a great day all riches in our reach 🤑🤑🤑
NAL maybe get an education as well as a life. Patents? There instead of their. Maybe stay off the sauce when you are posting. Yep really sad.
AgArCu, in fairness I will concede your posts yesterday did attempt to 'contextualise' the announcement, albeit from your habitual position of negativity. However, the problem you have is that people don't believe you, and with good reason.
It wasn't that long ago that you were telling us you'd successfully manipulated the share in order to fulfil a client's purchases - the clear implication being you were a finance professional. Now you tell us you are in construction. Maybe you've had a recent career change? In any event, I don't know about other folk, but I don't tend to go to construction workers for financial advice. Then there's your story about hotel meetings and Chinese executives - incidentally, I rather enjoyed that one, but some people appeared to be dangerously taken in by it.
And then there's the issue of your backstory. You tell us you are 42 years old and run your own business. When I was in that position at your age I didn't have a spare minute in the day and I certainly didn't have time to spend hours posting on social media (it didn't exist then, but you get my point)
I take it you can see the problem? Your invented stories mean you have no credibility, so it's little wonder other posters question your motivation.
Sometimes when my little grandkids are desperate for something, and there patents have told them no. They make up all sorts of reasons why they should be allowed. And the longer it goes the more desperate they get.
Adick, fort, dbw, and several others remind me of them.
There posts are showing more and more desperation by the day. And the reasons everything is good news get more pleading every day.
Sad really
Fawzi told me no regional drilling had taken place since January 22. So over 18 months
They said they were going to "aggressively" drill La Hueca 5 years ago, so...
Can someone tell me when the last drilling or exploration RNS was. ? seems a very very long time ago.
Don’t think I have ever read a more desperate post!!!!!
Addicknt, very significant and more so due to the ticking time clock which ironically exists for SOLG and Lasso.
If you were a chinese buyer or future partner etc, you really would like to get this wrapped up with the man that you struck your historic FTA deal with. Presentation this Thursday will surely deliver some more meat on the bone using the 25 year licence period.
Chinese know that a change of political control can be managed but it also often means it takes longer as new boys get feet under desk etc. So if you want to get things sorted and avoid some potential 'lefty' stuff on the elections, then you'd want to get as much paper work sorted as you can.
Today's news suggests that all involved want this wrapped imho. That bodes well.
The new term on the concession is still conditional, Quady. We still have fixed time limits for exploration and exploitation. That's why this is a non event. I thought you of all people would have read the various amended ministerial agreements from the last few years?
I have been thinking about our latest RNS all day and reread it a few times.
As addicknt says this is good news.
The reason being this takes away the possibility that we may lose our Cascabel license.
However we still have the problem of no potential bids and no clear way forward.
Hence we await the strategic review.
More haste please.
I don't think anyone is saying it's bad news, add? Just not exciting news. As I say, if they can follow it up with some big news it'll be important. Otherwise it's basic procedural stuff. That's not denigrating, it's contextualizing. Big difference 👍
Pad, this was undeniably good news and of great significance for the company, despite the efforts of one or two people to denigrate it.
Ha! That sounds a bit like they are marking their own homework... But if it's followed up soon by news of investment or a development in the exploitation phase, it might actually give us some confidence.
Https://www.mining.com/solgolds-cascabel-copper-project-renewed-for-25-years/
“The miner noted the renewal (of the licence) should give stakeholders confidence in the ability of current management to move forward with the project”
He's *