Gordon Stein, CFO of CleanTech Lithium, explains why CTL acquired the 23 Laguna Verde licenses. Watch the video here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
The region’s share of the world copper market is likely to increase in the coming decades as geologists believe that Ecuador and Argentina could eventually mine as much of the red metal as their neighbours. At present Ecuador only has one large-scale copper mine, while Argentina has none. But a pipeline of multibillion-dollar copper mines is set to come online in both countries, which will catapult them into global top ten copper producers by 2030.
nal why bother posting on here and trying to be smug, when everyone on here thinks you are a ****.
That's aimed at me BBG. "Tesla1" hates me for letting everyone know he is Slug posting under one of his many profiles (some set up back in 2021). He was brave enough to admit it on the other board but regets that. It might explain why there is a profile that is not invested in Solg, posts nowhere else and does nothing but support needalife and abuse LTHs on here. 1984Investor is also slug but he behaves himself under that profile because he doesn't want to get banned.
I once mentioned on here that my nephew didn't leave his bedroom much and that we were worried about him. He's Ok now, got a girlfriend etc now and seems happy enough but ever since then "Tesla1" has taunted me about mental health issues in my family. If that kind of vileness doesn't make you recognise Slug nothing will.
Anyway, boring and off-topic but I thought it worth explaining.
Liar?
Hopefully James is motivated to get us back up to that 20p and beyond. We wish him the best of luck.
Still posting as tesla1 on here slug, as well as 1984Investor? Interesting. I'd have thought once your cover was blown you'd give up.
He has way more credibility than you, Mr Liar
Needajob is a twat. Fullstop.
You are certainly one of the most astute investors I have ever met online needalife.
How you manage to take time out of your busy, busy day to talk to us I do not know.
Going jolly well isn't it?
Fort, be interested if you could run an eye over another of my shares. Ipx, rare earth explorers.
Bought them a couple of years ago for 0.010.
Today closed at at $1.34.
Do you think you could advice me wether to sell or hold.
Oh I forgot to mention, they've just signed a contract with the USA military.
I'm in one or two other exploration companies as well. Maybe I could employ you on a more formal basis, as my advisor.
Its a clear and obvious case of confirmation bias on display here ...
Despite the CEO being very straightforward and clear in his response, people who want to, who need to, choose to twist or interpret his response as fitting their view to keep the hope.....
Bbg, the man of many residences
What I love bbg, is all the while your making up stories in your fantasy world about where you live.
I'm actually living the dream, where you dream of living.
So dream on my friend, and don't have nightmares about losing the $100 you invested in solg.
Look into my eyes, ignore the pocket watch that is swinging before you. Look deep into my eyes! You are feeling sleepy! When I count to three you will fall asleep. 123... When I click my fingers you will wake up and buy SOLG at 10.5p per share.... Click!
Must be almost time for Richard Head to go to sleep ..
Costs tend to rise faster in more developed regions so Oz ops likely to feel the pinch more than South American ops. Frightening to think that many have AISC's well over $1200oz (gold producers) and yet it wasn't that long ago PoG was averaging closer to $1100oz and AISC's were nearer averages of $600oz. Oil producers the same. Many seemed suddenly capable of dealing with Oil prices in the $30's and making neutral to minor losses. Yet oil hits $100pb and suddenly costs mysteriously rise. There's no doubt about it... alot of money has gone into shareholder pockets over the last 3 years. Star performer on the commods is Orange Juice. Up 95% yoy. The irony is, GAS prices are down 66% yoy yet you wouldn't know it looking at the Electricity prices today. The wholesale prices seem to take an eternity before they hit home with the consumer and by the time they do, every middle man along the way has taken his cut. If they can manage Gold Spot prices, then surely they can manage gas spot prices and the electricity companies can stomach the fluctuations with usual hedges. No reason why electricity prices should be as high as they are now. Apart from making sure the likes of EDF / EoN maintain their profits.
Apparently we all need to have more pylons because they can't line the shareholders pockets if they have to bury the cables! Sad world we live in on a corporate basis. Greed and profits all the way.
Thanks for pointing out fmg fort.
been paying me a handsome divi for many years.
never had a bad word to say about them.
did I tell you I bought at $2 think they closed today at about $21.
dont want to sound like some of the dreamers on here,, but ive got 40,000 of the little rippers.
and I genuinely did have a mate on the inside years ago who gave me the nod.
twiggy, no geologist, but shrewd.
Mather geologist and clueless
also got my finger in the pie off one or two other exploration companies,
also on the brink of something huge, and haven't taken 10 years to do it
hence, I can live out my twilight years very comfortably. solg is just a bit of fun for me.
unlike some I won't hit the bread line if it goes to rat sh&&t
Partially because of the holdings of BHP and Newcrest I would imagine
Sean, if Barrick's CEO was playing poker, he wouldn't bother responding to a random stranger.
One of the constant themes on this BB - something I'm also guilty of - is a desperation to think that there is something else going on behind the scenes, a grand game of chess being played. In this instance I think we just need to read the email as it was written - unfortunately SOLG isn't a viable option for Barrick Gold.
It's undoubtedly been a tough year for many as rising costs have eaten away at profits, leaving investors sitting on the sidelines waiting for basket prices to find some strength.
SolGold in comparison should be building from here. It won't be long before it's AGM season and providing Scott and Co edge through then it's on to the revised mine plan which ought to breathe fresh life into the story. If the company can demonstrate an ability to push on (even if this means some faux willingness comes with it) then I suspect someone will take the bait.
A glimpse of how some are doing YoY. Some will have had larger/smaller divi's etc so need to bear that in mind.
In the green
1. Southern Copper UP 20%!!
2. Grupo Mexico UP 12%
3. FMG UP 4.5%
Neutral
1. Rio (relatively unchanged at 0.5% down)
In the red
1. Newmont DOWN 21%!!
2. Vale DOWN 18%
3. Barrick Gold DOWN 14.6%
4. BHP DOWN 8.6%
5. Freeport DOWN 2%
A few others out there but hats off to FMG.
Some metals in higher demand etc so will skew performance but then that's what's it is all about... getting the right mix and balance to suit the demand. At the right cost. Some will have projects in advanced status and others will be scratching around. I think Barrick are certainly scratching around if they are looking at P.akistan.
Of course Sean, and that's why I wrote "Make of it what you want", who knows what Barrick really wants to do and whether they would tell a random stranger anything. I am non the wiser as well.
I just thought I would share it as getting a reply was really a long shot and he was gracious enough to respond within a day.
DM, I most certainly haven't. So much for the protestations of improving shareholder communication!
Actually, I suspect what they meant by that was improved communications with BHP, which is all fine and dandy until SC needs the support of us minnows in two months time.
SharketMare would someone really give the yes or no on a potential billion £ acquisition in an email to a random stranger? No one is saying it's not true, only that - looked at rationally - the email is actually vague enough to possibly mean nothing. It might even be the plausible denial of someone holding their cards close to their chest.
The desperation on this thread is embarrassing. Some of you seriously need to get a grip. Or a job.
TI - thanks for sharing. Never underestimated the power of well written and courteous email!