We would love to hear your thoughts about our site and services, please take our survey here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
It could have been Italy yes, it was definitely west Germany
I’ll find the data this week for you.
Your analogy is stupid. I said we were third at one point under thatcher not that we ended up third now. We will only go down now because of the dilutive effects of massive nanny state and unsustainable immigration
I’d be amazed if we’re top 10 by 2050
Also, it was Italy we were trading places with, not France.
So your point that 'the proof of the pudding ' was based on you recalling the UK being the third largest economy by GDP for one quarter during Thatcher's time as PM? And the fact that we dropped down the international GDP standings throughout her time in office is.... Inconsequential? It's that one quarter that matters?! And the rest is to be ignored.
You must me hilarious at the footy. "Doesn't matter that we lost 5-1, for 7 minutes in the first half we were only 2-1 down!"
MoM or QoQ data will show it, it was post 86 I think
Https://web.archive.org/web/20130908231839/http://www.ers.usda.gov/datafiles/International_Macroeconomic_Data/Historical_Data_Files/HistoricalGDPSharesValues.xls
Here's the annual breakdown. Find the year during Thatcher's time as PM where the UK is 3rd. Clue: you won't.
It's not about your memory, slug. It's about facts. You got caught lying, as you have done about multiple other topics. It's just this one is not in the least subjective: you can easily be shown up.
The nutty eco warriors are going to have to choose their poison.
Give up on electrifying everything that moves, or accept that to do so means mining copper and other elements regardless of their “green credentials”
At some point economics have kick in. It is then that this nutty rubbish will get kicked into the long grass for good
You posted data five years apart and expected people not to notice
Of course most won’t, they are thick. That’s how the government got away with its covid propaganda
Sharp graphs warning of rampant 50% explosions in deaths. Yes…from 2 last week to 3 this
Easy to fool idiots with statistics even when you can claim they are true. Data exists and if you look closely enough you’ll find it. For at least one quarter in the mid eighties the U.K. surpassed west Germany and France to take third place behind Japan.
I recall it vividly. That it is isn’t on sites like Wiki which are demonstrably inaccurate and maintained for free by wokes is irrelevant.
Https://www.bloomberg.com/news/videos/2023-12-15/copper-demand-in-china-is-very-healthy-says-friedland-video
Good outlook for copper but he says it has to hit and stay at $15,000 tonne for a sustained period before anyone will build a new major mine in Latin America.
Also states the new major mines cost anything between 5-20 Billion to build and that mines have to prove their green credentials themselves. You can’t mine copper for the green economy by burning coal.
Hey Tex wow …… must be a dangerous place.
How many people do you think get shot in the USA each year (you should know) amazing anyone goes there to do business
Apparently over 600 mass shootings in 2022 alone ….. you should be ashamed
"She was. The proof was in the pudding, the U.K. was under her stewardship the third largest GDP in the world."
"I said briefly"
More lies and bs from slug. You didn't say briefly- the quote is there for all to see. GDP data was from IMF, World Bank, and United Nations. Do you have data to back up your claim? Is it from a more reputable source than these 3?
Honestly, champ, you need to admit you've been outwitted again. It's embarrassing. You tried the 'I am good at science and have a good right hook' line, but it didn't fix the fact you'd been shown as a liar.
Https://www.reuters.com/world/british-businessman-kidnapped-ecuador-local-media-2023-12-16/
You posted something with five yearly results you utter fkuwit
I said briefly
And it wasn’t in 1980, 1985 or 1990 as per your “wiki” link (another woke infested site not a factual site)
Why invest then colonel, oh wait a minute.
Is it because we have a tier 1 asset worth billions.
No one is here because of our boards performance and our board want this gone too.
So your either on board or your supporting bhp.
No answer RE: your claim about GDP, slug? Ready to admit you were lying?
I don't love having quady wade in on me making you look silly- I would hate for your mistake to be lost in a long thread. Like when you used to say vile things about black people to get your stupid comments about "temperature isn't actually a measure of anything" deleted... Don't think we didn't notice your tactic there. Worth losing an account to save face, apparently.
Give the Samaritans a ring colonel
No, read points 1 to 10. I left off Scott's woeful website update as didn't want to be accused of being too hard on him.
You know what Quady, if I point out that positive discrimination is disadvantaging straight white males and you think that makes me racis.t then racis.t I am. I couldn’t care less, lazy wokes throw the word around like confetti and it’s lost all “shock value”
I perfectly understood that covid was a con and what the true agenda was. You lot have gone quiet on that one now but at the time you were hurling the same insults at me about covid as you are about climate
You are frankly too stupid to see what the agenda is, and you are not alone. That is why democracy and freedoms are under massive threat from ethnic displacement and globalists
Even Sunak has “seen”’it, but he’s just throwing us a bone to distract us.
For God's sake Quady, change the record.
Boring.
Yes colonel let's give Scott the boot because the whole sector is down 70-80%.
Smickster,
Take note?? Of what?? That the trashed price of 7p presents a huge opportunity? For whom? Most investors are 'invested'. They are already fully loaded up, so there is no opportunity at all unless you have funds or the risk profile to continue adding to your stock.
I think you've my point over the last few weeks... it's not about patience... it's about catalysts. My bug bear is with zero exploration. I want to see exploration kicked off again. Like yesterday! Then you offer shareholders potential transformational growth through the drill bit while you 'patiently' wait on ENSA discussions.
Not much to ask is it?
If you asked Willem... would he like some nice exploration holes drilled while we wait on ENSA talks... his answer would be yes. If you asked him whether he was happy with zero exploration and still hefty cash burn of $70m he'd say .. NO.
The price is at near 7 to 8 lows for a reason and it's due to management's poor strategy and poor comms.
1. They've told the market they are doing an SR.
2. They've now told the market that the SR is bascially... erm.. forever
3. They told the market we are an explorer not a developer
4. They then tell the market we are not exploring, but looking at development plans on Alpala
5. They've told the market they are going to conserve cash
6. They last cash update showed they had blown almost $70m! They haven't conserved cash at all.
7. They've recently updated the market on rock chip/assays that were done 2 years ago!
8. They've recently thrown a well respected industry 'chairman' under the bus
9. They've been seeking to patch up relations with BHP... and failed.
10. They've organised an AGM whereby UK shareholders can't even dial in
smickster... take note of the above... unless you think it all perfectly fine?
He also said many juniors in the sector down (70-80%)
We’re I a terrible place valuation wise no one can argue that.
It’s simply how you see things moving from here
“ as an investor we can cry and complain about this low valuation….. we can also see it as a huge opportunity “
Colonel take note, I'm pretty sure Willem will be backing the board and seems happy with his investment.
Indeed Rox ….. the bit that struck home with me
“ as an investor we can cry and complain about this low valuation….. we can also see it as a huge opportunity “
Boom
His tip is invest in the "biggest discoveries'" now who has the biggest discovery?
Solgold should be worth Billions in MCAP , reassuring words from a fund manager investing in mining companies,
Solgold has reached the bottom, anyone buying at these levels are sure to be in the money , imo