We would love to hear your thoughts about our site and services, please take our survey here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
Slug ons data is not scientific data.
Climate change is real.
Try reading Nature, the leading periodical in the world.
Cross check it with the NOAA and NASA database's.
These are often raw data that is collected.
Yes it's tough to work your way through, but you would start to understand what man made climate change is.
At the moment you think ONS data is scientific data.
It's not.
Well for example in the case of excess deaths, ons data is a good source but I analyse it myself as anybody who isn’t hellbent on hiding the truth would do. Analyse it with an open mind not an agenda!
Serious question for you. Given that man made climate change is clearly b0ll0cks, what is this really about? What do they want and why?
It’s well known chinas CO2 output is growing at the rate of one U.K. worth of output every single year
If we got to net zero by some miracle by 2050 (and it’s utterly impossible when you cost it), China would have undone it by 2025
So given it is futile, what are we actually trying to do here and more pertinently why does it mean giving up our money and our feeedoms?
Do you never stop to wonder?
Slug serious question.
Which journals and periodicals do you get your science from and how do you cross reference it and what databases and datasets do you use.
Of course the electrolysis is powered but the engine runs on water. No water = no power
Fkuwit
I’m still waiting for the climate breakthrough!
Great news, we’ve got energy that’s clean and it’s free and 24/7 so energy bills are nothing, we’ve got cows that don’t guff so you can eat all the meat you want, we’ve got electric cars with 1000 mile range for the same price as their petrol equivalent, we have jets that run on chip fat so holidays are not only plentiful but actively encouraged and we urge everybody to mode around as far and as often as they wish
That would be progress, not the expensive digital imprisonment we’re being walked into by “scientists” and the useful idiots that believe every bit of their rubbish that they spout on behalf of the globalists
You said a car 'runs on water'. Can you explain? Because if it uses electrolysis it's going to need a power source (because bond fission is endothermic). Or you've described a hydrogen-powered car, and if you think that's 'running on water' then I've got a bridge on rightmove...
Face it, slug - you're just not that bright. And your ill-researched conspiracy theories about COVID, the environment... They just serve to highlight how thick you really are. I know you'll default to 'you are just a sheep' but the reality is scientists and engineers ARE more clever than basement incels like you, and no amount of making up stats about Thatcher can change that. Now give it a rest and maybe get a bit of education. Actual knowledge can't hurt you, I promise ♥️
Case in point. Bbc news right now
Every other sentence is “scientists say….”
It couldn’t be any clearer that it’s pure propaganda fed to gullible idiots
I see Slug thinks 97% of scientists are corrupt and take money to get the results people are paying for.
Even the most arrogant, ignorant imbecile couldn't possibly think that, but then I have to remind myself, that when it comes to slug, he has more than earned the title of the most unintelligent poster on here.
It’s Toyotas water engine and has inline electrolysis
To quote you muppets “Haven’t you heard of Google”
Myocarditis heading your way with any luck
Lmao “reputable journal”
Who do you think pays for this $cience? The same people paying for the “97% of scientists agree” climate bull crap!
You’re a proper dimwit 🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑
As I suspected - if you can't interpret simple trends in excess death data there was no hope of you following a metadata study in a reputable journal. Did you get your interpretation from the same place you got your Tesla water engine story? Because I think I've found your issue. I love how this new breed of 'awake but not woke!' simpletons all use exactly the same (erroneous) talking points. Birds of a feather, hey?
I wasn't worried about your finances poppet. I know you've got plenty of money for your 16 cars, 12 girlfriends and 19 bedroom house with a rocket launch pad 😂
Anyway, I thought the study showing yet another benefit of the vaccine roll out was interesting, but it's not for this board. Enjoy your smallpox 👍
Have a look at ONS excess death data. In particular look at the under 50s (the group that got the gene therapy shots)
1500+ excess deaths a week, the kind of numbers that had bugs crawling across the screen and 24/7 news articles shrieking “bring out your dead”
Why’s it gone quiet? Surely given all the elderly and infirm were picked off in the “pandemic” (the low hanging fruit of you will), we should if anything have negative excess deaths?
Keep reading your rubbish. I’ll look at data with my eyes wide open.
Don’t worry about my finances, I’m absolutely f****g loaded
I'm not entirely convinced you can read, slug, and I certainly think the reading age of the lancet is probably a bit above your station (which is either 'twat parkway' or 'simpleton central', I can never remember) but in case one of your parents can interpret for you, I'll post this here
https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-2600(23)00414-9
Just off to spend some Hemo profits. Not a cross ramp (you're probably too late) but there's a few weeks in the Maldives coming out of this baby 👌
Maybe go and have a handy over Thatcher to ease the pain of your loss. Just try not to think about what she did to our GDP...
The difference between a “conspiracy theory” and a fact is at most six months
Had your latest booster shot ScrewLoose? (Please say yes the evidence is now incontestable)
The
Hate is a perfectly normal emotion. Why would anybody want to remove it?
Not going to go into the realms of conspiracy theories (leave that to thicko slug) but the timing of Scott's purchase smacked of an effort to induce fomo and arrest the decline. Obviously it failed, and nothing since to stop the drop so he has egg on his face.
Rampers will immediately claim it's evidence of an imminent sale, but don't forget that they said that 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 years ago. Plenty of old messages on here to embarrass them with if needed - they're thick as f*** but they don't have any shame
Admin should follow twitter and throw Slug off for hate of all description.
You wouldn't be interested. It's all a bit woke
What’s the crux of this tweet? I’ve been thrown off Twitter for “violent speech”
(So much for musk bringing back free speech, still needs to reprogram his woke bots)
Well, sub 7 has come round even quicker than I thought and I've been waiting for it with a view to adding. But this just looks to be in freefall now and it's becoming even more of a concern. I average sub 9.8 now and am nearly 30% down. to think there are some here holding at 30p plus!
And we still have certain people saying the company is in the best position it's ever been in. It plainly isn't and the market knows it.
We all know the one single thing that will change things and anything else is just noise, imo.
The question now is how low will this go if we don't get a serious monetisation event soon?
Directors buying more late last year at far higher prices, and they know more than anyone what's about to happen so despite the constant whining on here I remain confident.
https://www.lse.co.uk/rns/directorpdmr-shareholding-4b6dbxaqsu2wmq1.html
Eloro, We agree on that!
That's a food space :)
Add, I do hope that we won't have to wait until December before we see the phased plan😆
I wonder why Lord Braggart would buy solg shares knowing that a raise is imminent?