We would love to hear your thoughts about our site and services, please take our survey here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
Still not sure what the 6 investment deals were for but the attached does state he met with Barrick executives so maybe a clue there?
https://www.primicias.ec/noticias/economia/noboa-mineria-canada-feria-catastro-inversion/
Addicknt - I didn't think it tongue-in-cheek.
Would have been a great opportunity to agree and then announce - on the day of talk - the IPA.
What better way to show Ecuador open for business and investment framework to encourage/protect business. With a globally significant Tier 1 asset.
Recent articles seem to suggest changes required to Constitution to enable the full protection framework that Noboa wants to offer / investors require? (I don't know the details).
Could be what is holding up improved IPA for Solgold?
Redknight - re: your reference to Porvenir drilling...
Isn't that the 2,610m of infill and extension diamond drilling referenced in the 1 Dec 2023 Porvenir RNS?
Holes 21-27?
I made a tongue-in-cheek observation on Friday about Caldwell attending PDAC so that we could sign the IPA with Nobby. Perhaps I wasn't too far from the truth. Mind you, where's the announcement?
Added
From PDAC presentation
"Mining and exploration portfolio spans 16 provinces, covering more than 3,586 Km2 in 89 concessions"
Meanwhile, have we had these results yet...?
"Announced encouraging mineralized intersections within the Porvenir Project at the Cacharposa porphyry copper-gold
target. The results of additional drilling since the previous 26 October 2021 data cut-off should support the conversion
of a large portion of the deposit into the measured and indicated categories, as well as significantly increasing the
resource tonnage in both the measured and indicated categories, and the inferred category"
Guess we'll fine out but pretty clear why he went in first in place.
$4.8bln is a huge figure when you consider that Ecuador mining is still very much small scale event with Chinese in South.
Makes Gina R's $120m deal look minor.
The mining cadestre is closed... so what exactly is Noboa signing $4.8bln agreements on??
Agreed...Baffling??
The best plan of all would be to get the monkey ooff our backs by simply splitting the business into two parts. We've been over this many times but the reality is, the market has not allocated much value to ENSA and zero to the regionals. You've got Gina R spending $120m over 10 years on a number of blocks... then there's Rio and Barrick plus BHP. All have some licence blocks but they are years and years away from getting to a position that ENSA are in right now.
I really can't understand why Bob and co won't do a spin off of the regionals. It should have been done last year. We already operate the business on an ENSA and non ENSA basis. All Royalty deals are ring fenced to ENSA. Not regionals.
What value would be placed on the regionals x 50 blocks with $50m raised in a newly floated spin off?? It has to be worth at least $150m if the assumption is there is at least 4 to 5 Tier 1 opportunities in there.
Then you have ENSA. That can just tick along in background and any delay games by the interested parties effects very little in the new exploration company. In time the exploration spin off could be worth more than ENSA if the latter drags on for whatever reason.
At the moment, it's the weight of the Tier1 project and the finance required that has basically reduced our share price to 5p and in process mothballed everything else. We've become a zombie company going no where fast.
Get a regionals spin off and new listed entity out there and SOLG shareholders can decide whether to sell out of that and bank some cash or to hold those new shares and see the fruits of some great holes drilled over the coming months and poss find another Alpala.
Ironically, what they should have done with the merger was to do a reverse takeover and put SOLG's 85% ENSA into CGP's 15% holding shell. That would have placed ENSA 100% in CGP listed in toronto with SOLG shareholders owning a respective stake in that business (shares etc). Then the remaining SOLG business listed on LSE and Toronto could have been the regionals. Trouble is, I suspect the off loading of ENSA (85%) was not workable due to the prime asset rule eg ... can't sell off your main asset as need to have offer for full business entity first.
Anyway... for now... we a management team that can't even get an SR story concluded and out to the market so any ideas of smart thinking plans like regional spin offs looks well past them.
"The Ecuadorian Government signed six mining investment commitments for USD 4.8 billion, during a visit by President Daniel Noboa to Canada this Monday, March 4, 2024."
What are the six????
Are we one of the parties involved?
Https://www.primicias.ec/noticias/economia/noboa-mineria-canada-feria-catastro-inversion/
“Neither fish nor fowl”
Perhaps solgold could open an aquarium and a chicken coop to solve that one. I see we’re now into beekeeping too (not joking!)
DBW, indeed we do have some interesting ones, but we have 70 (is that figure right?) or so and it seems pretty unlikely we'll ever do anything with them.
Of course, if we flog Cascabel as a single entity and we end up with plenty of cash, we may return to our original purpose of being an explorer, which is something we're pretty good at. Bristow referred to how junior explorers got diverted from their primary function and ended up being neither fish nor fowl, something I believe SC is anxious to avoid.
Its coming
Add …. We have plenty of tenements we could sell if needed.
We’ve pretty much got Warintza surrounded. It just depends how far apart our valuations are
“ Tinkimints copper prospect and the Helipuerto project concessions is adjacent to Solaris
Resources’ Warintza deposit within one of the most prolific portions of the Andean Jurassic
Porphyry Belt, which hosts the nearby Fruta Del Norte and Mirador mines, the Santa Barbara,
Panantza and, and SolGold’s newly discovered Cacharposa deposit at Porvenir.”
Q, exactly the point I made earlier. To my way of thinking, it would be no bad thing if we lost a few. Although I suppose it could be argued that a potential buyer may have a longer term interest in having so many concessions, but they are of little to no value to us at the moment.
Morning Fort
Agree funding news needed soon and the company is very aware this should not be left to the last minute causing further share price erosion. I’d also like to see a conditional funding package for development delivered ….. if we can prove this can be funded our position is strengthened greatly.
BBG, unfortunately decision/news time was expected by the market last year when the sp was tip toeing around the 18p level. As the SR saga dragged on, and as the cash pile dropped, the market simply replied with a negative slant and here we are at 6p with the lowest cash pile I think SOLG has had in last 5 years or more... lowest sp... lowest sentiment.... the list goes on.
Why oh why has Bob left it so late?
The bases hardly look loaded and hitting a home run from here is much harder now. He needs to swing and swing hard.
So, he's invited 'creep ownership' has he? Where's the evidence to support that, and why do you think it would be in his interests to do so? How exactly do you think he's able to control the share price?
Agree Fort.
Its decision/news time
Adikt. I read with interest your unfounded claim that the Ecuador government is prioritising solg.
Another of your thoughts being turned into facts.
There are several companies at similar stages to solg.
One of which I have a bit tied up in.
CURIPAMBA (EL DOMO).
Gold and copper, they have the environ licence.
And fully expect to start construction shortly.
Please, start stating your theories as theories. And not facts.
I wouldn't worry about that Quady.
Solgold have been meeting their (relatively modest) minimum spend commitments.
It may actually help Solg - focus on the top 10/20 instead of trying to keep 80+ (including ex-CGP concessions) going...
... and force some JV/farm-out of those lower down the priority list?
The reopening of the mining cadastre is likely to have a bigger impact.
Management really need plans for Cascabel/Porvenir and priority regionals sorted.
DBW,
Any update would be welcome. The most important being capital raised to continue in business. That's all the market is interested in right now.
Cash pile is sub $10m now .. likely around $8.5m. The accounts need to be officially signed off by end of this month. Technical report requiredas well. Basically.... they have 3 weeks to confirm everything and as per usual it's all 'last minute.com' with SOLG.
Why of why can't they be more organised? If they were, then we'd probably be around 12p levels now rather than 6p or 5p.
Bob has thrown the sp to the wolves and invited 'creep' ownership. Perhaps he's trying to flush out pi's and replace them with smarter hands?
Q, perhaps it will focus minds on getting one of those fabled JVs done on one of our many regionals!
I don't like the announcement that the government of Ecuador is going to accelerate the withdrawing of concessions that are not used.
How do we stand with that.
Announced at PDAC.