Gordon Stein, CFO of CleanTech Lithium, explains why CTL acquired the 23 Laguna Verde licenses. Watch the video here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
Since when racking up here and bragging condescendingly about one's shareholdings a sign of focus and objectivity? If 99% of the posters are filtered, how does Lord Braggart knows who isn't being objective? God, I hope that I don't become like him when I get to his ageš¢
Slug no one is shutting down science.
You are telling lies by saying they are.
No one has ever posted an article that stands up to scrutiny supporting your mad views.
Seems nothing happening at Solgold so the BB becomes what it is.
Hi Darren
Thank you for ALL your posts. They are most helpful, as are DBW's.
A pity that far too many on here don't share your focus and objectivity.
People who might be looking for funding?
You canāt close science down. Everything must be questioned and proven with repeatable, observable
Experiments
You cannot ever āsettleā science by paying a committee. Thatās where the politicalisation and commercialisation of $cience lets itself down
As mrs Merton would say āletās have a mass debateā
They wonāt, because they know itās all lies to make masses of money
Slug that is absolute rubbish.
Peer review is often done by people who are free to check, papers not only in their own field of study, but also where their crossover territory.
You talk complete rubbish.
Let me simplify it for you Quady. The peers reviewing the papers are bribed. Funding comes nearly all from government and big pharma
If you donāt toe the line, you get no funding
Climate is of course the same, but as professor Richard S Lindzen (author of over 200 papers on meteorology and climatology) famously put it
āIt will be remembered as the greatest mass delusion in the history of the world - that carbon dioxide, the life of plants, was considered for a time to be a deadly poisonā
Wilful blindness! Same as covid, deep down you know itās bullocks and youāve been had but youāre too proud to admit it
Mathersfinger try reading factual information.
Instead of the rubbish you post.
You rubbish peer review without telling anybody what peer review study that has stood up to scrutiny, you think is wrong.
You then have to supply the evidence as to why it's wrong so it can be checked .
Any fool can post individual's who sound off and even though factually wrong, people believe it.
That's the real problem today.
People who are wrong headed and cannot understand things posting someone's else's take without the ability to check or understand what is being said and taking it as true.
You I am afraid are someone who will be taken in by fake news on countless more occasions.
The sternest levels of resistance usually take three goes to breach properly. Weāve had a couple of decent goes at leaving 10p behind. Next one hopefully blows it away and on past 11
Slug you don't even understand what critical thinking is.
I have a part time job in a school and teach 2 hours a week.
I teach chess, critical thinking and critical analysis.
Well done, thanks for obliging...
Novice, you've twigged us.
Lse send us secret codes.
Apparently they have an idiot filter. Every time an idiot posts, lse send me a redknight type code, that tells me to reply.
You note I'm replying to you..... Idiot
Dr aseem is right that the panic and fear reduces the ability to think critically
We had all the evidence we needed from the diamond princess. 4000 old codgers locked up together and only 4 died. So we knew in the most vulnerable age group morbidity was 0.1% which is the same as flu
Itās that simple. Thatās critical thinking for you
I donāt wish harm on any person normally, but those who cheered on the idea of a vaccine apartheid society deserve absolutely everything they have coming at them for taking this untested, experimental and completely unnecessary junk
ššššššššš
Adikt, don't let your dislike for me, make you look silly.
There's a guy works down my local chip shop called elvis,
Do you think it could be, it couldn't could it,
And by the way, does this mean I'm on a no filter day today.
Fort, Add, nit so long ago, I mentioned my concerned about a placing at 3p to Bob, and he replied that he has the 157m shares which could be placed with a strategic investor. That should remove the need for a low SP raise. Hence, I am not inclined at this stage to believe that the Cornerstone guys will pocket these shares.
Why T F are we talking about covid and vaccines !!! all seems very convenient to me with regards to LSE having stooges to generate posts = advertising revenue, as the share price is in consolidation there is not a great deal to keep regurgitating so please stop entertaining them as it ruins a otherwise very good board
55p someday soon !!!
Dr Aseem Malhotra references the Stephen Hawking of Medicine, Prof. John Ioannidis, from Stanford University, who's the most cited medical researcher in the World and a mathematical genius. He published a paper in 2006 entitled,'Why most published research findings are false. The greater the financial interest in a given field, the less likely the research findings are to be true.'
Tesla, given that Darren uses his real name it's easy to verify the fact he lives in Ecuador. It's fascinating that both you and the Aussie Moron both presume to know about people's lives when of course neither of you have the faintest idea.
Aseem Malhotra speaks highly of vaccination, but not for the COVID vaccines.
Tesla - I query everything. I especially adhere to people who have nothing to gain and only have the prospect of losing their jobs. They're either all deluded or very principled?
Madpunter
Is this the first time a vaccine has been queried ā¦.oh let me think ā¦ā¦.MMR
There will always be pros and cons to any vaccine, but the world is a safer place with them.
The rubbish being spouted about new mRNA technology is ridiculous. The couple that founded the technology had been using mRNA to treat cancer for many years and altered it for the vaccine
Quady,
Your source is not credible, of course they would deny this because of the legal backlash this will cause, a bit like Horizon how it was denied until the end.
There is no point in debating anything with you as you are an ignorant, arrogant person.
You believe what you want, of course no Government or Pharmaceutical company would hide anything from us, why would they?
Think outside the box for once and research for yourself with an open mind, thereās an old saying, follow the money.
End of conversation with you as you are pointless
Strange how you question someoneās negative, but continually proven correct, view but when itās fantastical itās thatās great mateā¦..
Pot & kettle
However I will give you some credibility you have queried the recent director buys and options, so you can be objective when it suits ā¦..
Quady, it's interesting that you tell us your source is credible.
I remember copperpot using the same phrase about his source.
Remember, on a random trip to London, he popped into a random cafe in London. Low and behold, he got chatting to a random banker, no less, and the conversation by some strange act of fate, got round to solg, and would you believe this random banker he just met, told him he had a contact on the solg board.
Then would you believe, the random banker he just met, went on to divulge privileged info to a complete stranger.
Copper was adamant his claim was true, and his source was reliable.
So excuse me, if I take a pinch of salt with your latest claim.
By the way, was your source, the grand Master world champion chess playing mate of yours.
Quady - The money and policing of health trials is done by the pharmaceutical companies and is not independent. Ask yourself why 80k NHS worker's refused the jab despite the threat of losing their jobs? Why was Andrew Bridgend MP invited to number 10 and asked to name whatever he wanted, not to speak out about the jab? He could have had a place in the cabinet or the Lords, but chose to ruin his career on principle and give us the truth. There's billions at stake, so pharmaceutical companies will whatever it takes to hide behind the peer reviewed research that THEY FUND. The truth is coming out in places like Finland and Japan in the court systems that they can't manipulate.