Gordon Stein, CFO of CleanTech Lithium, explains why CTL acquired the 23 Laguna Verde licenses. Watch the video here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
Jezzoo why do you think going to production means serious dilution .
Like you serious question.
Correction if BHP had acquired CGP
I'm afraid to say ,Q, your thinking is getting incredibly muddled.
I assume you mean bhp and cgp?
I’d agree on that.
"...if BHP had acquired BHP..." erm?
Because if BHP had acquired BHP the book would have been less diverse, they would have 20% of Solgold.
NM had this in mind.
Ignore them addick, they make it up as they go along... this will be sold when the decision has been made and agreed between all relevant parties or it will go to production if the circumstances are not favourable to the relevant suitors. If you believe in SolGold then either way we'll all benefit. There might be 5 or 6 years difference depending on the out come but ultimately nobody knows. and if you're a trader good luck ;))
Good grief addicknt quite the opposite just read what I said.
A takeover of Solgold is unlikely how many times do I have to say it.
And then you continue to misquote me.
It's the ENSA part that has changed.
Why would bhp acquiring it be so bad if they paid a fair price that the shareholders agreed to ?
The majority would prefer a fair price as opposed to more dilution going to production, especially the PI’s I think.
A serious question Quady, I’d be interested to know
Add … seems to be about the size of it
Q, let me see if I've got this right.
The diverse book always meant we would never be taken over, but now it's become more diverse a takeover is more likely?
Okay Bozi a fair question.
I always thought that the diverse book made purchasing Solgold almost impossible.
With us acquiring CGP two things have changed.
First the book has become more diverse and BHP and NCM will be diluted.
Second ENSA is now 100% owned Solgold.
So I still believe that the purchase of Solgold is extremely unlikely.
But where my position has changed is because of the change of ENSA we can go two ways.
This can be mean we use it to raise funding on better terms.
Or we can put ENSA into a wrapper and treat it separately.
Hence JV or sell it.
I have always said I will reassess my position should the book change.
To my mind it's changed for the better.
After all many on here said BHP would acquire it and that would not be good.
Quady - but surely you realise that people are finding it hard to reconcile your reassessment given your previous refusal to budge even in the slightest.
You're allowed to change your mind by the way but you've got to say "I previously thought there was no alternative to A but with X,Y and Z I have to now admit that B is a possibility/probability/certainty.
Why does a consolidation of Cascabel swing your opinion so much?
Oh I understand your reassessment alright !
And that's exactly what you are so scared of.
Being found out !
And people are starting to see the real you.
Tick Tock !
Is this company going to be sold off? As I read the post this morning Solgold/Cornerstone are looking for a partner, to me it smacks of a JV, just my take on DC’s wording.
Checked Solgold again, and The Australian, 16 hrs ago, 13.10.22 has a new preamble:
"Solgold's boss Darren Cuzzubbo told shareholders overnight on Wed, that MITSUI was ONE of a NUMBER of potential PARTNERS."
Atb
No DBW that's not what I have said.
Read my posting history.
Good grief Jezzoo why not read my posts and at least understand my reassessment.
You continue to make yourself look unintelligent.
Listen it’s simple as you’ve said I have been 100% wrong in saying this will be sold …. So far …. I agree
You have been 100% right in saying it’ll go to production… so far ….again Ill agree
When it’s sold you therefore have to be 100% wrong it’s that simple
You were wrong then ?
Isn't reassessing changing your view ?
A pretty big "reassessment" don't you think ?
As DBW implied, if and when a sale happens, you will have turned full circle and swear blind that's what you said would happen.
It's a bigger man that admits his mistakes but we know you'll just disappear and never come back.
Bozi I have changed my position slightly. just read my last 3 days posts.
Because the book has changed and I reassessed.
Addicknt, yes I have always said that production is the most likely outcome and unlike others have stated my reasons in some detail.
I know you have tried to rewrite history on this.
But for those that wish to check who is correct feel free to click on my name and read my posting history.
The Quady's not for turning !!
This is comedy gold !
"Oh dear, DBW you are really twisting things.
I have been 100% right up to now and you have been 100% wrong up to now over many years.
I have always said that we may get a bid but not until things change.
Things are changing now, so don't pretend this has never been my position."
It seems that not only have many people called you out this afternoon but MANY people ticked up their posts.
Have a great weekend everybody, everybody but "U Turn Queasy".
Quady, the Kwasi Kwateng of the SOLG board !
Agree that Quady hasn't said anything of the sort.
Quady - you've maintained the company strapline throughout and talked about financing production. Better to have the courage to admit that and say things changed.
After all, you'll have been right for 99% of the time and ultimately wrong whereas those who have called a bid at various junctures over the years will have been largely wrong but ultimately correct.
I appreciate why it matters... because it has been debated so intensely, but we've got to let it go at some stage.
Add sorry to bring the bickering back to this board I’ll stop now. But myself and many others have suffered years of arrogance and abuse for suggesting this would be sold. Now rather than accept it could be wrong it tries to move the goalposts.
Definitely on the spectrum ….
I’m not bothered who’s wrong or right as long as I get 100p for each of my shares! ;) atb whatever your stance