Gordon Stein, CFO of CleanTech Lithium, explains why CTL acquired the 23 Laguna Verde licenses. Watch the video here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
Forte, I think one aspect is upside down here.
I doubt that we need to complete the SR to then put the sale sign out.
I am pretty confident that a Dataroom has been open for a while and the company is rather hoping that the result of the SR is accompanied by some offer or financing structure that counters the theoretical sale prices that DZ discussed in the last presentation (the 78p slide).
Bu that is me...
I'm expecting a few TR1's to pop up when we get the new issue on Dec 9th. Dilution of approx 6.3% means BHP and NCM both drop below 13% level. A few others might be close to the thresholds. Blackrock might need to tidy up their 'instruments' lol or also face a TR1. Might explain why we've had over 40m to 50m share traded in last wee and a half.
Some might like the lack of transparency that comes with skirting around within the 1% thresholds, so will want to maintain that stance.
Thank you Q.
To be honest it's still better to talk about other shares than to start the mutual attacks and insults, at least we are sharing the same goals.....
There's no way Fawzi would answer a loaded question like that - not with any substance anyway. It also wouldn't be a fair position to put him in.
Just my view of course.
As we saying Bob Sangha can manage a billion dollar tender process but not an IPO of an exploration NewCo?
Come on fellas.
Good morning Bozi I am aware it's not for Solgold to manage the share price.
I was looking for a roundabout way to ask Solgold when they think they will have some share changing news.
In other words we have had lots of various innuendo but no substance.
Just wanted to know if they have a rough timescale.
Fort, you make a very good point about the CFO. In the absence of permanent executive officers, there's no way we could complete an IPO. And there hasn't been any suggestion that we're looking for them.
You probably have Fort as you tend to cover most bases which is fine.
I wouldn't sell Cascabel to the market. I'd sell it to whoever wants to buy SolGold. That part wouldn't change. We'd just be removing the high priority regionals from the package.
I'd just be keen to hear the rationale from SOLG in terms of selling the company for X over selling Cascabel and surrounding licences for say 90% of X and continuing with the NewCo.
I don't think it stacks up unless SolGold can attract a bidding war that pushes us over 100p for the lot, and the merits of that are debatable obviously depending the side of the fence the individual sits on (Redknight vs Stackhigh).
Good luck Scrat.
Hello Italian I have followed vrs for years.
I believe with the amount of patents which are well regulated that this is a well run company.
We have concrene and also the graphene sports ware coming up.
Downside they have no money.
Just think when the recovery comes this company has a lot of upside.
By the way for clarity I am averaged at just over 26p so still underwater but will be buying more over next two years.
Anything under 30p I will go for if I have spare funds.
Hope to own around a million shares in two years time.
But if price takes off I will never achieve that.
Anyway only talking about vrs on here as nothing happening at the moment.
Not a share tip just sharing what I am doing.
Doing an IPO of cascabel like Rio did with Turquoise hill is something I have banged on about for a while but as the new CFO lady (IPO expert) has departed I think that's been shelved.
I'm not sure selling Cascabel to the 'market' is the best way to realise shareholder value as markets rarely price the asset at fair value and always discount by at least 50% due to project risks. What you want for fair value is an auction process. It's not hard is it?? Just announce strategic review complete and cascabel sale auction process underway with number of interested parties which may result in an offer for the asset or could involved the business as a whole blah blah blah.
Spinning out 'some' of the regionals makes sense if the parties interested in Cascabel are not willing to pay a fair prospective price for the acreage. May as well package up some of the subs and put them into a new co... which is of course what we know Mather wants as he's the exploration fan and has said numerous times... exploration = growth.
Porvenir may or may not be of interest to Valuestone/chinese anymore after hole 1 proved to be the highlight. But you never know, they might be keen to explore around the warinza region and fund the new exploration company. It makes sense to retain the SOLG brand name for cascabel as the locals are familiar with it. Although having said that, I highlighted a few days ago that ENSA seems to be appearing more often in Ecuador PR activity. So perhaps SOLG retained for exploration as will help with regional permit issues while Cascabel gets put into new co called ENSA and that is then sold or IPO'd.
At end of the day, the strategic review is all about maximising shareholder value and opportunities. Cascabel is a heavy weight around our necks with huge Capex burdens and questions that remain unanswered that is and has held us back.
IMHO, if SOLG were to drill some regionals and strike big, then the market cap could easily return to where we are today which just shows you how undervalued it is considering Cascabel literally priced at zero. Of course it's perceived the other way around that regionals are priced at zero. But they are in effect mini cascabels waiting to happen.
We'll find out soon no doubt and would expect some news on strategic review before AGM is they want the votes!! Otherwise... it could be tight again! The merger certainly isn't going to happen until 2023 as it looks like TSX red tape holding them back.
You may be right DBW, but it would be a shame to see the company sold when there could be so much more value to be created for those happy to take the risk over the medium and long term.
For example, it shouldn't make a difference to anyone wanting a sale whether just a company holding Cascabel and other local licences is sold because nothing else is carrying much value anyway.
Newc can then start again and give those inclined another bite at the andean cherry.
I don't know if this scenario really appeals to you personally but I've been giving it more thought and I'm really keen. I just think it suits everyone equally.
Quady, I’d decided some time back to drop Lloyd’s as a direct holding. Slightest misery in the uk economy and it seems to slump and the next year or two doesn’t look too perky, or the five after that. I’m holding more in investment trusts these days, allied, bankers, Bruner, Caledonia, city, RIT, witan at the mo. Trying for a less exciting life! Obvs they all have Lloyd’s in the mix, I’m just trimming out big individual company shareholdings .. except just the one now!
Q, I looked at VRS a few months back and decided to postpone the investment, luckily. Why do you think it's a good entry now? Sorry all for O/T.
*spin out (predictive text).
Quady - it isn't for SolGold to manage the share price.
SolGold management manages the company. The market sorts out the share price.
We should be asking the rest of the market.
A sprint out provides the fairest short and long term value for all.
It has Addicknt. I accept it isn't new.
I just don't think I'd really considered it, but now I am as I'm of the view that the price we'd get for an outright sale wouldn't be an acceptable return for some investors.
Good luck Scrat.
Not something I would have done, as I separate income generating shares from growth shares.
But with the housing market being what it is and Lloyd's holding a large mortgage book.
Who knows.
I mentioned VRS about a month ago. They are up about 60% over that time period.
I own less than 100,000 shares in them. But slowly increasing my holding with spare money.
Monte...have a look at Noront...23c to 110c in 5 months...
600% from the current SP is c115p...
Well I’ve just done something I’ve been pondering for a while. I’ve dumped my Lloyd’s Bank holding (at a small loss) that being the biggest single company in my ISA, and put it all on the other single company horse. Right, where’s my prayer mat!!
Agreed addicknt.
I hold shares in Vodafone and Direct Line Group as part of my income portfolio.
Can't recall ever not having a straight forward RNS.
Well I’ve lodged my votes nothing to be done now but sit back and watch this unfold ….. I think it’ll be a straightforward takeover and hopefully they’ll get this merger over the line soon .
Q, the response would be: "we're waiting for the outcome of the SR".
I certainly agree with your point about ambiguity. The company is a past master at issuing announcements that leave shareholders scrabbling around in the dark looking for hints, which leads us to speculation. I'd like to see an end to this; straightforward, unambiguous statements, please.
I think you're probably correct addicknt.
It's just we get lots of nothing from tweets and no proper communication on intent.
And no the latest RNS's are too ambiguous.
Q, I suspect they're asking themselves the same question.