Gordon Stein, CFO of CleanTech Lithium, explains why CTL acquired the 23 Laguna Verde licenses. Watch the video here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
got a response from IR.... 'would look to announce an appointment later this summer if all moves along'
it would seem it is not imminent
Great post rcgl....with their scale, surely BHP should be behove to Blackrock rather than the other way around...
As you say (and you can check easily on the Blackrock website) their SOLG holdings are spread around a number of funds. However I would be pretty sure they have a centralised buy/sell function amalgamating/processing each funds orders
Blackrock are massive. Their funds own significant holdings in virtually every large cap developed market stock in the world and thousands of others too. I don't think it's in any way possible there is some centralized, co-ordinated trading activity around a tiny name like Solgold.
Solg is included in a various of their iShares ETFs as well as a few of their actively managed funds. They will not have autonomy over every buy and sell decision, a lot of them will be dictated by inflows and outflows into the ETFs and funds meaning they have to buy more or sell some of the shares in the basket. Also if the indices the ETFs track rebalance their baskets then the ETF has to also rebalance.
The task of trade reporting, regulatory filing etc must be absolutely biblical at somewhere like Blackrock, no wonder some clerical errors were made. I was involved in the implementation of trade reporting and pre- / post-trade transparency disclosure when MiFID 2 came in and it was virtually impossible to get right from the start, as was acknowledged by the FCA who expected a best efforts approach. The FCA were unable themselves to figure out exactly what some of the requirements of MiFID 2 actually were or how they should be applied.
Agree RK. Blackrock have many funds. Any one of then could be buying selling SOLG independently of each other. That does in no way mean they are colluding with BHP. I'd welcome PFS, but more so some concrete news on plans to production. News I want is JV news.
Why on eaerh is this being clogged up with a meaningless argument...once again you're letting Qady wind you up...
The SP is up almost 4% DESPITE Blackrock...
And BTW I don't for one second believe that the biggest fund managers in the world and a reputation to protect would be doing anything for BHP...
Fantasy...
Stevie you are a nasty piece of work. It's me that has been correct, when I said no bid is imminent or in the near future. It's me along with a few other posters, who barely post these days, that have called out the conspiracy theorys. You just post out of ignorance and insult others when you don't get your own way. Grow up.
This chatroom has become riddled with self talk.
Quades - if you were a piece of ham, I'd dispose of you because you are waaaayyy past your sell by date luv.
Are you still living alone in that flat?
Z
Qwuady's main MO is putting doubt in a posters mind that they have either misread or misinterpreted something Qerwady said. I believe they call it gaslighting.
Zoros, best to ignore the Quadswollop - The guy never gets anything right.
Zoros, you are suffering from non reading again. No one is saying that, please reread.
so many sheeple and lemmings about. Can you still believe there are individuals out there (several on here it seems) who genuinely believe that anyone can access your email account and do whatever they like with your messages? Can you imagine the total breakdown in communications globally? It would wipe out google/yahoo, etc overnight.
FFS guys wisen up perleeze ..you sad sad people.
Z
Sorry Rigger, although i don't like agreeing with Quardy, but RFC4021 introduced the Expires header, which can be used by some User Agents to auto delete expired messages, outlook as a User Agent can do this, although i would be surprised if the common user knows about this
Although this does not sound like what shippy has explained
Factually correct quady... but only possible if A) use MS exchange in that case and B) in the same organisation as the person you wish to recall from. So unless you work at solgold and have a solgold email addresss... solg is not recalling/deleting your emails.
https://support.microsoft.com/en-gb/office/recall-or-replace-an-email-message-that-you-sent-35027f88-d655-4554-b4f8-6c0729a723a0
Like mine do, have they automatically dropped into an archive/historic type file?
https://www.extendoffice.com/documents/outlook/4689-outlook-delete-email-after-sending.html
This is just one-way to delete unread emails. Tools exist in IT departments, often scripted by administration.
Morning Shipright, expiry dates can be put on emails before sent. This doesn't enable autodeleting at a certain date on its own, but their are a number of tools that you can employ to do this. This method is often used in commercial business, where ideas are being exchanged, but nothing has been decided, and you want to keep discussions confidential.
Apparently they can
That happened to others too Shippy....
I've no idea how they've managed to do this other than if like most of us do your using webmail & wonder if they can do this because of this.......
Normal email like microsoft outlook you could only recall a message if it had not been read as FTJNY states.......
puzzled me when I'd heard it too........
r's
bn.c
Same happened to me Shipwright. All my emails were deleted (even the ones not associated with Habitat) when Habitat went under, too.
Strange ;)
Z
PMSL!
Z
emails cannot be "recalled from your inbox" period
I always thought that e mails could only be recalled if un-read. So assuming you had read Nick’s e mails Shippy then I’m struggling to understand how Solg could recall these e mails from your mailbox? Very odd!
When Nick stood down as ceo all the emails I had from him at the solg email address were deleted from my mailbox.
I'm not even sure that's legal
posted an email to solgold investor relations, got an automated out of office response that came via dgrgloballimited. very odd